Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
$156.4M | $0.20 | -0.42% | 86.12% | $40.17 |
|
BNGO
Bionano Genomics, Inc.
|
$6.9M | -$2.34 | -2.86% | -82.39% | $7.50 |
|
BRKR
Bruker Corp.
|
$847M | $0.32 | -2.17% | 619.12% | $51.79 |
|
HBIO
Harvard Bioscience, Inc.
|
$20M | $0.01 | -5.93% | 8650% | $2.00 |
|
KMTS
Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd.
|
$21M | -$0.57 | 52.53% | -24.76% | $29.14 |
|
PRPO
Precipio, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
$34.60 | $40.17 | $1.6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.67x |
|
BNGO
Bionano Genomics, Inc.
|
$1.56 | $7.50 | $15.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.18x |
|
BRKR
Bruker Corp.
|
$48.13 | $51.79 | $7.3B | 77.08x | $0.05 | 0.42% | 2.13x |
|
HBIO
Harvard Bioscience, Inc.
|
$0.73 | $2.00 | $32.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.37x |
|
KMTS
Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd.
|
$27.52 | $29.14 | $1.3B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 19.03x |
|
PRPO
Precipio, Inc.
|
$23.89 | -- | $41.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.63x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
3.35% | 2.112 | 4.55% | 2.22x |
|
BNGO
Bionano Genomics, Inc.
|
25.67% | -1.308 | 103.34% | 1.58x |
|
BRKR
Bruker Corp.
|
45.23% | 0.852 | 40.19% | 0.76x |
|
HBIO
Harvard Bioscience, Inc.
|
75.26% | 4.098 | 218.87% | 0.35x |
|
KMTS
Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd.
|
21.45% | 0.000 | 3.43% | 5.32x |
|
PRPO
Precipio, Inc.
|
20.58% | 4.591 | 11.47% | 1.19x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
$72.3M | $2.9M | 1.39% | 1.44% | 1.85% | -$5.7M |
|
BNGO
Bionano Genomics, Inc.
|
$3.4M | -$8.5M | -58.02% | -84.77% | -115.9% | -$5.9M |
|
BRKR
Bruker Corp.
|
$399.6M | $55.2M | -0.56% | -1.2% | 6.42% | -$54.1M |
|
HBIO
Harvard Bioscience, Inc.
|
$11.2M | $245K | -68.29% | -155.33% | 1.19% | $482K |
|
KMTS
Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd.
|
$11.4M | -$31.8M | -77.65% | -105.99% | -140.73% | -$25.8M |
|
PRPO
Precipio, Inc.
|
$2.6M | -$61K | -8.62% | -10.15% | -0.9% | -$44K |
Bionano Genomics, Inc. has a net margin of 32.45% compared to Azenta, Inc.'s net margin of -115.42%. Azenta, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.44% beat Bionano Genomics, Inc.'s return on equity of -84.77%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
45.4% | $1.11 | $1.8B |
|
BNGO
Bionano Genomics, Inc.
|
45.75% | -$1.59 | $67M |
Azenta, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.17, signalling upside risk potential of 15.75%. On the other hand Bionano Genomics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 390.2%. Given that Bionano Genomics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Azenta, Inc., analysts believe Bionano Genomics, Inc. is more attractive than Azenta, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
1 | 4 | 0 |
|
BNGO
Bionano Genomics, Inc.
|
1 | 0 | 0 |
Azenta, Inc. has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.831% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bionano Genomics, Inc. has a beta of 2.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.592%.
Azenta, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bionano Genomics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Azenta, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bionano Genomics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Azenta, Inc. quarterly revenues are $159.2M, which are larger than Bionano Genomics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Azenta, Inc.'s net income of $51.7M is higher than Bionano Genomics, Inc.'s net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Azenta, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bionano Genomics, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Azenta, Inc. is 2.67x versus 0.18x for Bionano Genomics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
2.67x | -- | $159.2M | $51.7M |
|
BNGO
Bionano Genomics, Inc.
|
0.18x | -- | $7.4M | -$8.5M |
Bruker Corp. has a net margin of 32.45% compared to Azenta, Inc.'s net margin of -6.8%. Azenta, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.44% beat Bruker Corp.'s return on equity of -1.2%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
45.4% | $1.11 | $1.8B |
|
BRKR
Bruker Corp.
|
46.44% | -$0.41 | $4.5B |
Azenta, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.17, signalling upside risk potential of 15.75%. On the other hand Bruker Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $51.79 which suggests that it could grow by 7.84%. Given that Azenta, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bruker Corp., analysts believe Azenta, Inc. is more attractive than Bruker Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
1 | 4 | 0 |
|
BRKR
Bruker Corp.
|
7 | 5 | 1 |
Azenta, Inc. has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.831% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bruker Corp. has a beta of 1.174, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.405%.
Azenta, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bruker Corp. offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Azenta, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bruker Corp. pays out 26.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Bruker Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Azenta, Inc. quarterly revenues are $159.2M, which are smaller than Bruker Corp. quarterly revenues of $860.5M. Azenta, Inc.'s net income of $51.7M is higher than Bruker Corp.'s net income of -$58.5M. Notably, Azenta, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bruker Corp.'s PE ratio is 77.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Azenta, Inc. is 2.67x versus 2.13x for Bruker Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
2.67x | -- | $159.2M | $51.7M |
|
BRKR
Bruker Corp.
|
2.13x | 77.08x | $860.5M | -$58.5M |
Harvard Bioscience, Inc. has a net margin of 32.45% compared to Azenta, Inc.'s net margin of -5.98%. Azenta, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.44% beat Harvard Bioscience, Inc.'s return on equity of -155.33%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
45.4% | $1.11 | $1.8B |
|
HBIO
Harvard Bioscience, Inc.
|
54.23% | -$0.03 | $56.9M |
Azenta, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.17, signalling upside risk potential of 15.75%. On the other hand Harvard Bioscience, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 175.71%. Given that Harvard Bioscience, Inc. has higher upside potential than Azenta, Inc., analysts believe Harvard Bioscience, Inc. is more attractive than Azenta, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
1 | 4 | 0 |
|
HBIO
Harvard Bioscience, Inc.
|
1 | 1 | 0 |
Azenta, Inc. has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.831% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvard Bioscience, Inc. has a beta of 1.531, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.123%.
Azenta, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvard Bioscience, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Azenta, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvard Bioscience, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Azenta, Inc. quarterly revenues are $159.2M, which are larger than Harvard Bioscience, Inc. quarterly revenues of $20.6M. Azenta, Inc.'s net income of $51.7M is higher than Harvard Bioscience, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Azenta, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harvard Bioscience, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Azenta, Inc. is 2.67x versus 0.37x for Harvard Bioscience, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
2.67x | -- | $159.2M | $51.7M |
|
HBIO
Harvard Bioscience, Inc.
|
0.37x | -- | $20.6M | -$1.2M |
Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of 32.45% compared to Azenta, Inc.'s net margin of -145.29%. Azenta, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.44% beat Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -105.99%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
45.4% | $1.11 | $1.8B |
|
KMTS
Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd.
|
50.63% | -$0.64 | $208.9M |
Azenta, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.17, signalling upside risk potential of 15.75%. On the other hand Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $29.14 which suggests that it could grow by 5.9%. Given that Azenta, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd., analysts believe Azenta, Inc. is more attractive than Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
1 | 4 | 0 |
|
KMTS
Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd.
|
5 | 1 | 0 |
Azenta, Inc. has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.831% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
Azenta, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Azenta, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd. pays out 1.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Azenta, Inc. quarterly revenues are $159.2M, which are larger than Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of $22.6M. Azenta, Inc.'s net income of $51.7M is higher than Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -$32.8M. Notably, Azenta, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Azenta, Inc. is 2.67x versus 19.03x for Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
2.67x | -- | $159.2M | $51.7M |
|
KMTS
Kestra Medical Technologies Ltd.
|
19.03x | -- | $22.6M | -$32.8M |
Precipio, Inc. has a net margin of 32.45% compared to Azenta, Inc.'s net margin of -1.17%. Azenta, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.44% beat Precipio, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.15%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
45.4% | $1.11 | $1.8B |
|
PRPO
Precipio, Inc.
|
37.95% | -$0.05 | $17.3M |
Azenta, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.17, signalling upside risk potential of 15.75%. On the other hand Precipio, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -20.46%. Given that Azenta, Inc. has higher upside potential than Precipio, Inc., analysts believe Azenta, Inc. is more attractive than Precipio, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
1 | 4 | 0 |
|
PRPO
Precipio, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Azenta, Inc. has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.831% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Precipio, Inc. has a beta of 1.085, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.543%.
Azenta, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Precipio, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Azenta, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Precipio, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Azenta, Inc. quarterly revenues are $159.2M, which are larger than Precipio, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.8M. Azenta, Inc.'s net income of $51.7M is higher than Precipio, Inc.'s net income of -$79K. Notably, Azenta, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Precipio, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Azenta, Inc. is 2.67x versus 1.63x for Precipio, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AZTA
Azenta, Inc.
|
2.67x | -- | $159.2M | $51.7M |
|
PRPO
Precipio, Inc.
|
1.63x | -- | $6.8M | -$79K |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.