AVBH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Civista Bancshares, Inc. has a net margin of 15.59% compared to Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 19.58%. Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.55% beat Civista Bancshares, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.43%.

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.13, signalling upside risk potential of 16.79%. On the other hand Civista Bancshares, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.67 which suggests that it could grow by 2.27%. Given that Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Civista Bancshares, Inc., analysts believe Avidbank Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Civista Bancshares, Inc..

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.364, which suggesting that the stock is 63.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Civista Bancshares, Inc. has a beta of 0.701, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.889%.

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Civista Bancshares, Inc. offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Avidbank Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Civista Bancshares, Inc. pays out 31.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Civista Bancshares, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are -$23.6M, which are smaller than Civista Bancshares, Inc. quarterly revenues of $64.9M. Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$37.7M is lower than Civista Bancshares, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M. Notably, Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.52x while Civista Bancshares, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avidbank Holdings, Inc. is 2.49x versus 1.56x for Civista Bancshares, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens & Northern Corp. has a net margin of 15.59% compared to Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 15.87%. Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.55% beat Citizens & Northern Corp.'s return on equity of 9.51%.

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.13, signalling upside risk potential of 16.79%. On the other hand Citizens & Northern Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.52%. Given that Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Citizens & Northern Corp., analysts believe Avidbank Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Citizens & Northern Corp..

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.364, which suggesting that the stock is 63.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens & Northern Corp. has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.86%.

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citizens & Northern Corp. offers a yield of 5.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Avidbank Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens & Northern Corp. pays out 66.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens & Northern Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are -$23.6M, which are smaller than Citizens & Northern Corp. quarterly revenues of $40.9M. Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$37.7M is lower than Citizens & Northern Corp.'s net income of $6.5M. Notably, Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.52x while Citizens & Northern Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avidbank Holdings, Inc. is 2.49x versus 2.07x for Citizens & Northern Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio) has a net margin of 15.59% compared to Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 18.66%. Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.55% beat Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio)'s return on equity of 8.84%.

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.13, signalling upside risk potential of 16.79%. On the other hand Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio) has an analysts' consensus of $33.08 which suggests that it could grow by 5.29%. Given that Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio), analysts believe Avidbank Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio).

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.364, which suggesting that the stock is 63.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio) has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33%.

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio) offers a yield of 5.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Avidbank Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio) pays out 48.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are -$23.6M, which are smaller than Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio) quarterly revenues of $156.6M. Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$37.7M is lower than Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio)'s net income of $29.2M. Notably, Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.52x while Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio)'s PE ratio is 10.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avidbank Holdings, Inc. is 2.49x versus 1.80x for Peoples Bancorp, Inc. (Ohio). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shore Bancshares, Inc. has a net margin of 15.59% compared to Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 16.9%. Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.55% beat Shore Bancshares, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.27%.

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $31.13, signalling upside risk potential of 16.79%. On the other hand Shore Bancshares, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.38 which suggests that it could fall by -2%. Given that Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Shore Bancshares, Inc., analysts believe Avidbank Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Shore Bancshares, Inc..

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.364, which suggesting that the stock is 63.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shore Bancshares, Inc. has a beta of 0.942, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.756%.

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shore Bancshares, Inc. offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Avidbank Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shore Bancshares, Inc. pays out 36.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Shore Bancshares, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avidbank Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are -$23.6M, which are smaller than Shore Bancshares, Inc. quarterly revenues of $84.9M. Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$37.7M is lower than Shore Bancshares, Inc.'s net income of $14.3M. Notably, Avidbank Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.52x while Shore Bancshares, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avidbank Holdings, Inc. is 2.49x versus 1.85x for Shore Bancshares, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.