ASST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

U.S. Global Investors, Inc. has a net margin of -13392.94% compared to Strive, Inc. (United States)'s net margin of 35.58%. Strive, Inc. (United States)'s return on equity of -134.46% beat U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.84%.

Strive, Inc. (United States) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand U.S. Global Investors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Strive, Inc. (United States) has higher upside potential than U.S. Global Investors, Inc., analysts believe Strive, Inc. (United States) is more attractive than U.S. Global Investors, Inc..

Strive, Inc. (United States) has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U.S. Global Investors, Inc. has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.036%.

Strive, Inc. (United States) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. U.S. Global Investors, Inc. offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Strive, Inc. (United States) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. U.S. Global Investors, Inc. pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strive, Inc. (United States) quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than U.S. Global Investors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.2M. Strive, Inc. (United States)'s net income of -$206.7M is lower than U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s net income of $1.5M. Notably, Strive, Inc. (United States)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while U.S. Global Investors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strive, Inc. (United States) is 88.07x versus 3.03x for U.S. Global Investors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -13392.94% compared to Strive, Inc. (United States)'s net margin of 48.78%. Strive, Inc. (United States)'s return on equity of -134.46% beat MARA Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.38%.

Strive, Inc. (United States) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MARA Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.32 which suggests that it could grow by 87.03%. Given that MARA Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Strive, Inc. (United States), analysts believe MARA Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Strive, Inc. (United States).

Strive, Inc. (United States) has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 5.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 442.356%.

Strive, Inc. (United States) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strive, Inc. (United States) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Strive, Inc. (United States) quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $252.4M. Strive, Inc. (United States)'s net income of -$206.7M is lower than MARA Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $123.1M. Notably, Strive, Inc. (United States)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MARA Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strive, Inc. (United States) is 88.07x versus 5.68x for MARA Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group, Inc. has a net margin of -13392.94% compared to Strive, Inc. (United States)'s net margin of 6.35%. Strive, Inc. (United States)'s return on equity of -134.46% beat Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.92%.

Strive, Inc. (United States) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Principal Financial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $89.08 which suggests that it could grow by 3.66%. Given that Principal Financial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Strive, Inc. (United States), analysts believe Principal Financial Group, Inc. is more attractive than Strive, Inc. (United States).

Strive, Inc. (United States) has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.653%.

Strive, Inc. (United States) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Principal Financial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Strive, Inc. (United States) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group, Inc. pays out 42.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strive, Inc. (United States) quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Strive, Inc. (United States)'s net income of -$206.7M is lower than Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s net income of $233.9M. Notably, Strive, Inc. (United States)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strive, Inc. (United States) is 88.07x versus 1.24x for Principal Financial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoFi Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -13392.94% compared to Strive, Inc. (United States)'s net margin of 10.99%. Strive, Inc. (United States)'s return on equity of -134.46% beat SoFi Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.16%.

Strive, Inc. (United States) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SoFi Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $26.44 which suggests that it could fall by -9.03%. Given that SoFi Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Strive, Inc. (United States), analysts believe SoFi Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Strive, Inc. (United States).

Strive, Inc. (United States) has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoFi Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.930, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.972%.

Strive, Inc. (United States) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoFi Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strive, Inc. (United States) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoFi Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Strive, Inc. (United States) quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than SoFi Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Strive, Inc. (United States)'s net income of -$206.7M is lower than SoFi Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $139.4M. Notably, Strive, Inc. (United States)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SoFi Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 52.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strive, Inc. (United States) is 88.07x versus 7.87x for SoFi Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.