ASML Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.42% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 16.54%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 53.71% beat Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $907.36, signalling upside risk potential of 28.15%. On the other hand Applied Materials has an analysts' consensus of $201.7746 which suggests that it could grow by 29.34%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than ASML Holding NV, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than ASML Holding NV.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.755, which suggesting that the stock is 75.502% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials has a beta of 1.712, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.198%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Applied Materials offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Applied Materials quarterly revenues of $7.2B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.5B is higher than Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.84x while Applied Materials's PE ratio is 20.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 8.45x versus 4.68x for Applied Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 30.42% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 9.53%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 53.71% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.91%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $907.36, signalling upside risk potential of 28.15%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $126.98 which suggests that it could grow by 24.86%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than Advanced Micro Devices, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than Advanced Micro Devices.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.755, which suggesting that the stock is 75.502% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.969, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.904%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ASML Holding NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.4B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.5B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $709M. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.84x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 74.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 8.45x versus 5.99x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 30.42% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 35.53%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 53.71% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $907.36, signalling upside risk potential of 28.15%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $785.09 which suggests that it could grow by 11.63%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than KLA.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.755, which suggesting that the stock is 75.502% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.453%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. KLA offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.5B is higher than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.84x while KLA's PE ratio is 25.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 8.45x versus 8.18x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lam Research has a net margin of 30.42% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 28.19%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 53.71% beat Lam Research's return on equity of 53.73%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $907.36, signalling upside risk potential of 28.15%. On the other hand Lam Research has an analysts' consensus of $89.77 which suggests that it could grow by 19.85%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than Lam Research.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.755, which suggesting that the stock is 75.502% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lam Research has a beta of 1.645, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.523%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Lam Research offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research pays out 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Lam Research quarterly revenues of $4.7B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.5B is higher than Lam Research's net income of $1.3B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.84x while Lam Research's PE ratio is 20.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 8.45x versus 5.68x for Lam Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.