ANDE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Sysco Corp. has a net margin of 2.8% compared to The Andersons, Inc.'s net margin of 1.87%. The Andersons, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.15% beat Sysco Corp.'s return on equity of 87.4%.

The Andersons, Inc. has a consensus price target of $73.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.06%. On the other hand Sysco Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $90.69 which suggests that it could grow by 3.04%. Given that The Andersons, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sysco Corp., analysts believe The Andersons, Inc. is more attractive than Sysco Corp..

The Andersons, Inc. has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco Corp. has a beta of 0.579, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.083%.

The Andersons, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Sysco Corp. offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. The Andersons, Inc. pays 28.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco Corp. pays out 55.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Andersons, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Sysco Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.8B. The Andersons, Inc.'s net income of $71.1M is lower than Sysco Corp.'s net income of $389M. Notably, The Andersons, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.19x while Sysco Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Andersons, Inc. is 0.20x versus 0.51x for Sysco Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a net margin of 2.8% compared to The Andersons, Inc.'s net margin of -0.05%. The Andersons, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.15% beat United Natural Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.21%.

The Andersons, Inc. has a consensus price target of $73.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.06%. On the other hand United Natural Foods, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $41.13 which suggests that it could grow by 8.4%. Given that The Andersons, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, Inc., analysts believe The Andersons, Inc. is more attractive than United Natural Foods, Inc..

The Andersons, Inc. has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods, Inc. has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.42199999999999%.

The Andersons, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. United Natural Foods, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Andersons, Inc. pays 28.16% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Andersons, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Andersons, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than United Natural Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.8B. The Andersons, Inc.'s net income of $71.1M is higher than United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$4M. Notably, The Andersons, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.19x while United Natural Foods, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Andersons, Inc. is 0.20x versus 0.07x for United Natural Foods, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding Corp. has a net margin of 2.8% compared to The Andersons, Inc.'s net margin of 1.88%. The Andersons, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.15% beat US Foods Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 14.99%.

The Andersons, Inc. has a consensus price target of $73.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.06%. On the other hand US Foods Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $110.20 which suggests that it could grow by 18.5%. Given that US Foods Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than The Andersons, Inc., analysts believe US Foods Holding Corp. is more attractive than The Andersons, Inc..

The Andersons, Inc. has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.976, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.412%.

The Andersons, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. US Foods Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Andersons, Inc. pays 28.16% of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Andersons, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Andersons, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than US Foods Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $9.8B. The Andersons, Inc.'s net income of $71.1M is lower than US Foods Holding Corp.'s net income of $184M. Notably, The Andersons, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.19x while US Foods Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 31.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Andersons, Inc. is 0.20x versus 0.54x for US Foods Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Corp. has a net margin of 2.8% compared to The Andersons, Inc.'s net margin of 4.83%. The Andersons, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.15% beat Universal Corp.'s return on equity of 6.99%.

The Andersons, Inc. has a consensus price target of $73.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.06%. On the other hand Universal Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $78.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.84%. Given that Universal Corp. has higher upside potential than The Andersons, Inc., analysts believe Universal Corp. is more attractive than The Andersons, Inc..

The Andersons, Inc. has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Corp. has a beta of 0.661, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.881%.

The Andersons, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Universal Corp. offers a yield of 6.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. The Andersons, Inc. pays 28.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Corp. pays out 85.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Andersons, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Universal Corp. quarterly revenues of $861.3M. The Andersons, Inc.'s net income of $71.1M is higher than Universal Corp.'s net income of $41.6M. Notably, The Andersons, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.19x while Universal Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Andersons, Inc. is 0.20x versus 0.46x for Universal Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.