ANDE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Sadot Group has a net margin of 1.04% compared to Andersons's net margin of 0.58%. Andersons's return on equity of 8.02% beat Sadot Group's return on equity of 5.62%.

Andersons has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 63.56%. On the other hand Sadot Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 404.91%. Given that Sadot Group has higher upside potential than Andersons, analysts believe Sadot Group is more attractive than Andersons.

Andersons has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.147% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sadot Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Andersons has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Sadot Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Andersons pays 25.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Sadot Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Andersons's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Andersons quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Sadot Group quarterly revenues of $201.7M. Andersons's net income of $27.4M is higher than Sadot Group's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Andersons's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.35x while Sadot Group's PE ratio is 14.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Andersons is 0.12x versus 0.02x for Sadot Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tarsier has a net margin of 1.04% compared to Andersons's net margin of --. Andersons's return on equity of 8.02% beat Tarsier's return on equity of --.

Andersons has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 63.56%. On the other hand Tarsier has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Andersons has higher upside potential than Tarsier, analysts believe Andersons is more attractive than Tarsier.

Andersons has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.147% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tarsier has a beta of -1.274, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 227.409%.

Andersons has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Tarsier offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Andersons pays 25.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Tarsier pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Andersons's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Andersons quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Tarsier quarterly revenues of --. Andersons's net income of $27.4M is higher than Tarsier's net income of --. Notably, Andersons's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.35x while Tarsier's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Andersons is 0.12x versus -- for Tarsier. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal has a net margin of 1.04% compared to Andersons's net margin of 0.02%. Andersons's return on equity of 8.02% beat Universal's return on equity of 8.44%.

Andersons has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 63.56%. On the other hand Universal has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Andersons has higher upside potential than Universal, analysts believe Andersons is more attractive than Universal.

Andersons has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.147% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal has a beta of 0.808, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.161%.

Andersons has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Universal offers a yield of 5.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Andersons pays 25.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal pays out 65.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Andersons quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Universal quarterly revenues of $597.1M. Andersons's net income of $27.4M is higher than Universal's net income of $130K. Notably, Andersons's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.35x while Universal's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Andersons is 0.12x versus 0.48x for Universal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.