VST.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Sol Strategies, Inc. has a net margin of 10.03% compared to Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -324.27%. Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -73.62% beat Sol Strategies, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.19%.

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sol Strategies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1160.87%. Given that Sol Strategies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victory Square Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Sol Strategies, Inc. is more attractive than Victory Square Technologies, Inc..

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.948, which suggesting that the stock is 5.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sol Strategies, Inc. has a beta of 2.695, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.514%.

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sol Strategies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victory Square Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sol Strategies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $10.5M, which are larger than Sol Strategies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $1.1M is higher than Sol Strategies, Inc.'s net income of -$8.2M. Notably, Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.63x while Sol Strategies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victory Square Technologies, Inc. is 2.86x versus 9.46x for Sol Strategies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Wellness Strategies has a net margin of 10.03% compared to Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of --. Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -73.62% beat Global Wellness Strategies's return on equity of --.

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Wellness Strategies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Wellness Strategies, analysts believe Victory Square Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Global Wellness Strategies.

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.948, which suggesting that the stock is 5.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Wellness Strategies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Wellness Strategies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victory Square Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Wellness Strategies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $10.5M, which are larger than Global Wellness Strategies quarterly revenues of --. Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $1.1M is higher than Global Wellness Strategies's net income of --. Notably, Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.63x while Global Wellness Strategies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victory Square Technologies, Inc. is 2.86x versus -- for Global Wellness Strategies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a net margin of 10.03% compared to Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -3.32%. Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -73.62% beat Quinsam Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -41.93%.

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quinsam Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quinsam Capital Corp., analysts believe Victory Square Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Quinsam Capital Corp..

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.948, which suggesting that the stock is 5.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quinsam Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.05%.

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quinsam Capital Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victory Square Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quinsam Capital Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $10.5M, which are larger than Quinsam Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of -$4M. Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $1.1M is higher than Quinsam Capital Corp.'s net income of $132.1K. Notably, Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.63x while Quinsam Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victory Square Technologies, Inc. is 2.86x versus -- for Quinsam Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has a net margin of 10.03% compared to Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of --. Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -73.62% beat New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than New Frontier Ventures, Inc., analysts believe Victory Square Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than New Frontier Ventures, Inc..

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.948, which suggesting that the stock is 5.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has a beta of -0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.578%.

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Frontier Ventures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victory Square Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Frontier Ventures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Victory Square Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $10.5M, which are larger than New Frontier Ventures, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $1.1M is higher than New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s net income of -$10.5K. Notably, Victory Square Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.63x while New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victory Square Technologies, Inc. is 2.86x versus 29.93x for New Frontier Ventures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.