Financhill
Sell
26

FGH.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.59
Seasonality move :
20.83%
Day range:
$0.59 - $0.59
52-week range:
$0.50 - $2.00
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
17.92x
P/B ratio:
8.53x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
12.5K
1-year change:
-57.86%
Market cap:
$9.6M
Revenue:
$749.5K
EPS (TTM):
-$18.18

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FGH.CX
Forte Group Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
HYTN.CX
HYTN Innovations
-- -- -- -- --
MILK.CX
Plant Veda Foods
-- -- -- -- --
SBD.CX
SBD Capital
-- -- -- -- --
SPS.CX
Sweet Poison Spirits
-- -- -- -- --
TNY.CX
The Tinley Beverage
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FGH.CX
Forte Group Holdings
$0.59 -- $9.6M -- $0.00 0% 17.92x
HYTN.CX
HYTN Innovations
$0.3500 -- $31.5M -- $0.00 0% 26.25x
MILK.CX
Plant Veda Foods
$0.04 -- $1.4M -- $0.00 0% 1.29x
SBD.CX
SBD Capital
$0.04 -- $276.2K -- $0.00 0% 19.53x
SPS.CX
Sweet Poison Spirits
$0.04 -- $392.8K -- $0.00 0% --
TNY.CX
The Tinley Beverage
$0.03 -- $9.1M -- $0.00 0% 4.42x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FGH.CX
Forte Group Holdings
84.03% -2.285 57.5% 0.03x
HYTN.CX
HYTN Innovations
-- 6.782 -- 0.50x
MILK.CX
Plant Veda Foods
-- 4.104 -- --
SBD.CX
SBD Capital
-94.07% -5.111 38.51% 0.13x
SPS.CX
Sweet Poison Spirits
-- -3.835 -- --
TNY.CX
The Tinley Beverage
-- -0.395 -- 1.22x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FGH.CX
Forte Group Holdings
$5.6K -$903.7K -336.14% -2390.76% -3359.43% -$452.7K
HYTN.CX
HYTN Innovations
$201.8K -$306.7K -401.05% -451.66% -78.57% -$327.8K
MILK.CX
Plant Veda Foods
-- -- -- -- -- --
SBD.CX
SBD Capital
$2.1K -$40.1K -- -- -1034.92% -$7.1K
SPS.CX
Sweet Poison Spirits
-- -$18.1K -- -- -- -$23.1K
TNY.CX
The Tinley Beverage
$189.8K -$579K -317.1% -- 173.06% -$961.6K

Forte Group Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FGH.CX or HYTN.CX?

    HYTN Innovations has a net margin of -4615.23% compared to Forte Group Holdings's net margin of -83.13%. Forte Group Holdings's return on equity of -2390.76% beat HYTN Innovations's return on equity of -451.66%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    20.63% -$0.08 $6.3M
    HYTN.CX
    HYTN Innovations
    51.7% -$0.00 $342.6K
  • What do Analysts Say About FGH.CX or HYTN.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HYTN Innovations has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forte Group Holdings has higher upside potential than HYTN Innovations, analysts believe Forte Group Holdings is more attractive than HYTN Innovations.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    0 0 0
    HYTN.CX
    HYTN Innovations
    0 0 0
  • Is FGH.CX or HYTN.CX More Risky?

    Forte Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HYTN Innovations has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FGH.CX or HYTN.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HYTN Innovations offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forte Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HYTN Innovations pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FGH.CX or HYTN.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $26.9K, which are smaller than HYTN Innovations quarterly revenues of $390.3K. Forte Group Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is lower than HYTN Innovations's net income of -$324.5K. Notably, Forte Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HYTN Innovations's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forte Group Holdings is 17.92x versus 26.25x for HYTN Innovations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    17.92x -- $26.9K -$1.2M
    HYTN.CX
    HYTN Innovations
    26.25x -- $390.3K -$324.5K
  • Which has Higher Returns FGH.CX or MILK.CX?

    Plant Veda Foods has a net margin of -4615.23% compared to Forte Group Holdings's net margin of --. Forte Group Holdings's return on equity of -2390.76% beat Plant Veda Foods's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    20.63% -$0.08 $6.3M
    MILK.CX
    Plant Veda Foods
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About FGH.CX or MILK.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Plant Veda Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forte Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Plant Veda Foods, analysts believe Forte Group Holdings is more attractive than Plant Veda Foods.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    0 0 0
    MILK.CX
    Plant Veda Foods
    0 0 0
  • Is FGH.CX or MILK.CX More Risky?

    Forte Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plant Veda Foods has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FGH.CX or MILK.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plant Veda Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forte Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plant Veda Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FGH.CX or MILK.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $26.9K, which are larger than Plant Veda Foods quarterly revenues of --. Forte Group Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Plant Veda Foods's net income of --. Notably, Forte Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plant Veda Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forte Group Holdings is 17.92x versus 1.29x for Plant Veda Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    17.92x -- $26.9K -$1.2M
    MILK.CX
    Plant Veda Foods
    1.29x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns FGH.CX or SBD.CX?

    SBD Capital has a net margin of -4615.23% compared to Forte Group Holdings's net margin of -992.38%. Forte Group Holdings's return on equity of -2390.76% beat SBD Capital's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    20.63% -$0.08 $6.3M
    SBD.CX
    SBD Capital
    54.68% -$0.01 -$210K
  • What do Analysts Say About FGH.CX or SBD.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBD Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forte Group Holdings has higher upside potential than SBD Capital, analysts believe Forte Group Holdings is more attractive than SBD Capital.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    0 0 0
    SBD.CX
    SBD Capital
    0 0 0
  • Is FGH.CX or SBD.CX More Risky?

    Forte Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBD Capital has a beta of -0.074, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.402%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FGH.CX or SBD.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SBD Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forte Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBD Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FGH.CX or SBD.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $26.9K, which are larger than SBD Capital quarterly revenues of $3.9K. Forte Group Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is lower than SBD Capital's net income of -$38.4K. Notably, Forte Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SBD Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forte Group Holdings is 17.92x versus 19.53x for SBD Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    17.92x -- $26.9K -$1.2M
    SBD.CX
    SBD Capital
    19.53x -- $3.9K -$38.4K
  • Which has Higher Returns FGH.CX or SPS.CX?

    Sweet Poison Spirits has a net margin of -4615.23% compared to Forte Group Holdings's net margin of --. Forte Group Holdings's return on equity of -2390.76% beat Sweet Poison Spirits's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    20.63% -$0.08 $6.3M
    SPS.CX
    Sweet Poison Spirits
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About FGH.CX or SPS.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sweet Poison Spirits has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forte Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Sweet Poison Spirits, analysts believe Forte Group Holdings is more attractive than Sweet Poison Spirits.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    0 0 0
    SPS.CX
    Sweet Poison Spirits
    0 0 0
  • Is FGH.CX or SPS.CX More Risky?

    Forte Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sweet Poison Spirits has a beta of 0.317, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.304%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FGH.CX or SPS.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sweet Poison Spirits offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forte Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sweet Poison Spirits pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FGH.CX or SPS.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $26.9K, which are larger than Sweet Poison Spirits quarterly revenues of --. Forte Group Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Sweet Poison Spirits's net income of -$5.8K. Notably, Forte Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sweet Poison Spirits's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forte Group Holdings is 17.92x versus -- for Sweet Poison Spirits. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    17.92x -- $26.9K -$1.2M
    SPS.CX
    Sweet Poison Spirits
    -- -- -- -$5.8K
  • Which has Higher Returns FGH.CX or TNY.CX?

    The Tinley Beverage has a net margin of -4615.23% compared to Forte Group Holdings's net margin of -441.89%. Forte Group Holdings's return on equity of -2390.76% beat The Tinley Beverage's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    20.63% -$0.08 $6.3M
    TNY.CX
    The Tinley Beverage
    49.05% -$0.01 $870.4K
  • What do Analysts Say About FGH.CX or TNY.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Tinley Beverage has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forte Group Holdings has higher upside potential than The Tinley Beverage, analysts believe Forte Group Holdings is more attractive than The Tinley Beverage.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    0 0 0
    TNY.CX
    The Tinley Beverage
    0 0 0
  • Is FGH.CX or TNY.CX More Risky?

    Forte Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Tinley Beverage has a beta of 1.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.964%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FGH.CX or TNY.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Tinley Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forte Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Tinley Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FGH.CX or TNY.CX?

    Forte Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $26.9K, which are smaller than The Tinley Beverage quarterly revenues of $386.9K. Forte Group Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is higher than The Tinley Beverage's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Forte Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Tinley Beverage's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forte Group Holdings is 17.92x versus 4.42x for The Tinley Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FGH.CX
    Forte Group Holdings
    17.92x -- $26.9K -$1.2M
    TNY.CX
    The Tinley Beverage
    4.42x -- $386.9K -$1.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?

With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…

Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?

If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…

3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks

Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…

Stock Ideas

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x

Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8

Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.

Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8

UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.

Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8

Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock