BEE.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Armory Mining has a net margin of 25.53% compared to Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net margin of --. Bee Vectoring Technologies International's return on equity of -167.71% beat Armory Mining's return on equity of --.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Armory Mining has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bee Vectoring Technologies International has higher upside potential than Armory Mining, analysts believe Bee Vectoring Technologies International is more attractive than Armory Mining.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Armory Mining has a beta of 1.568, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.804%.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Armory Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bee Vectoring Technologies International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armory Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International quarterly revenues are $81.9K, which are larger than Armory Mining quarterly revenues of --. Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net income of $20.9K is higher than Armory Mining's net income of -$80.9K. Notably, Bee Vectoring Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Armory Mining's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bee Vectoring Technologies International is 2.74x versus -- for Armory Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding has a net margin of 25.53% compared to Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net margin of 83.06%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International's return on equity of -167.71% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding's return on equity of -1.35%.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1025%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.857%.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bee Vectoring Technologies International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International quarterly revenues are $81.9K, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net income of $20.9K is lower than Replenish Nutrients Holding's net income of $1.8M. Notably, Bee Vectoring Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding's PE ratio is 67.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bee Vectoring Technologies International is 2.74x versus 0.72x for Replenish Nutrients Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mongoose Mining has a net margin of 25.53% compared to Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net margin of --. Bee Vectoring Technologies International's return on equity of -167.71% beat Mongoose Mining's return on equity of --.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mongoose Mining has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bee Vectoring Technologies International has higher upside potential than Mongoose Mining, analysts believe Bee Vectoring Technologies International is more attractive than Mongoose Mining.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mongoose Mining has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.624%.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mongoose Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bee Vectoring Technologies International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mongoose Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International quarterly revenues are $81.9K, which are larger than Mongoose Mining quarterly revenues of --. Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net income of $20.9K is higher than Mongoose Mining's net income of -$13.9K. Notably, Bee Vectoring Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mongoose Mining's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bee Vectoring Technologies International is 2.74x versus -- for Mongoose Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nexco Resources has a net margin of 25.53% compared to Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net margin of --. Bee Vectoring Technologies International's return on equity of -167.71% beat Nexco Resources's return on equity of --.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nexco Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bee Vectoring Technologies International has higher upside potential than Nexco Resources, analysts believe Bee Vectoring Technologies International is more attractive than Nexco Resources.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nexco Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nexco Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bee Vectoring Technologies International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nexco Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International quarterly revenues are $81.9K, which are larger than Nexco Resources quarterly revenues of --. Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net income of $20.9K is higher than Nexco Resources's net income of -$107K. Notably, Bee Vectoring Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nexco Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bee Vectoring Technologies International is 2.74x versus -- for Nexco Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.