LIS.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

37 Capital, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium South Development Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium South Development Corp.'s return on equity of -34.53% beat 37 Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Lithium South Development Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 37 Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lithium South Development Corp. has higher upside potential than 37 Capital, Inc., analysts believe Lithium South Development Corp. is more attractive than 37 Capital, Inc..

Lithium South Development Corp. has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.522% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 37 Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.248%.

Lithium South Development Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 37 Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium South Development Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 37 Capital, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium South Development Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 37 Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium South Development Corp.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than 37 Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$46.9K. Notably, Lithium South Development Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 37 Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium South Development Corp. is -- versus -- for 37 Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium South Development Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium South Development Corp.'s return on equity of -34.53% beat Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Lithium South Development Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Renforth Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 500%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lithium South Development Corp., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Lithium South Development Corp..

Lithium South Development Corp. has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.522% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.447%.

Lithium South Development Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium South Development Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium South Development Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium South Development Corp.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K. Notably, Lithium South Development Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renforth Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium South Development Corp. is -- versus -- for Renforth Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium South Development Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium South Development Corp.'s return on equity of -34.53% beat Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Lithium South Development Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lithium South Development Corp. has higher upside potential than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Lithium South Development Corp. is more attractive than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc..

Lithium South Development Corp. has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.522% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.399, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.888%.

Lithium South Development Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium South Development Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium South Development Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium South Development Corp.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s net income of -$832.1K. Notably, Lithium South Development Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium South Development Corp. is -- versus -- for Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium South Development Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium South Development Corp.'s return on equity of -34.53% beat St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -10.32%.

Lithium South Development Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lithium South Development Corp. has higher upside potential than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp., analysts believe Lithium South Development Corp. is more attractive than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp..

Lithium South Development Corp. has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.522% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.792%.

Lithium South Development Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium South Development Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium South Development Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium South Development Corp.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s net income of -$814K. Notably, Lithium South Development Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium South Development Corp. is -- versus 5,524.25x for St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.