ARTG.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of 35.98% compared to Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net margin of 25.53%. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.4% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $48.05, signalling upside risk potential of 27.76%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Artemis Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe Artemis Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.573%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Artemis Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Artemis Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $308.1M, which are larger than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net income of $110.9M is higher than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, Artemis Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.23x while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Artemis Gold, Inc. is 15.14x versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IAMGOLD Corp. has a net margin of 35.98% compared to Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net margin of 21.96%. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.4% beat IAMGOLD Corp.'s return on equity of 10.96%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $48.05, signalling upside risk potential of 27.76%. On the other hand IAMGOLD Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $25.27 which suggests that it could grow by 9.15%. Given that Artemis Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than IAMGOLD Corp., analysts believe Artemis Gold, Inc. is more attractive than IAMGOLD Corp..

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IAMGOLD Corp. has a beta of 1.782, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.241%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IAMGOLD Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Artemis Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IAMGOLD Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Artemis Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $308.1M, which are smaller than IAMGOLD Corp. quarterly revenues of $973.4M. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net income of $110.9M is lower than IAMGOLD Corp.'s net income of $213.8M. Notably, Artemis Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.23x while IAMGOLD Corp.'s PE ratio is 28.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Artemis Gold, Inc. is 15.14x versus 4.36x for IAMGOLD Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lithium Royalty Corp. has a net margin of 35.98% compared to Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -220.88%. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.4% beat Lithium Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -2.98%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $48.05, signalling upside risk potential of 27.76%. On the other hand Lithium Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $8.30 which suggests that it could grow by 13.23%. Given that Artemis Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lithium Royalty Corp., analysts believe Artemis Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Lithium Royalty Corp..

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithium Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithium Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Artemis Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithium Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Artemis Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $308.1M, which are larger than Lithium Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $574.3K. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net income of $110.9M is higher than Lithium Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Artemis Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.23x while Lithium Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Artemis Gold, Inc. is 15.14x versus 161.20x for Lithium Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a net margin of 35.98% compared to Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net margin of 1.11%. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.4% beat Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.59%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $48.05, signalling upside risk potential of 27.76%. On the other hand Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.43 which suggests that it could grow by 52.12%. Given that Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Artemis Gold, Inc., analysts believe Neo Performance Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Artemis Gold, Inc..

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.373% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neo Performance Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.038%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Artemis Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc. pays out 94.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Artemis Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $308.1M, which are larger than Neo Performance Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $168.3M. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net income of $110.9M is higher than Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M. Notably, Artemis Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.23x while Neo Performance Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is 77.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Artemis Gold, Inc. is 15.14x versus 0.99x for Neo Performance Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.