PWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EMCOR Group, Inc. has a net margin of 4.49% compared to Quanta Services, Inc.'s net margin of 6.87%. Quanta Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.57% beat EMCOR Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.58%.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $476.63, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand EMCOR Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $758.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.06%. Given that EMCOR Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, Inc., analysts believe EMCOR Group, Inc. is more attractive than Quanta Services, Inc..

Quanta Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.106% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.953%.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.09%. EMCOR Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Quanta Services, Inc. pays 6.14% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group, Inc. pays out 4.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quanta Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.6B, which are larger than EMCOR Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Quanta Services, Inc.'s net income of $342.8M is higher than EMCOR Group, Inc.'s net income of $295.4M. Notably, Quanta Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 63.29x while EMCOR Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services, Inc. is 2.37x versus 1.71x for EMCOR Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a net margin of 4.49% compared to Quanta Services, Inc.'s net margin of 11.9%. Quanta Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.57% beat Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s return on equity of 45.16%.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $476.63, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1,150.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.24%. Given that Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, Inc., analysts believe Comfort Systems USA, Inc. is more attractive than Quanta Services, Inc..

Quanta Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.106% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.986%.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.09%. Comfort Systems USA, Inc. offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Quanta Services, Inc. pays 6.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA, Inc. pays out 8.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quanta Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.6B, which are larger than Comfort Systems USA, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Quanta Services, Inc.'s net income of $342.8M is higher than Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s net income of $291.6M. Notably, Quanta Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 63.29x while Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services, Inc. is 2.37x versus 4.01x for Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fluor Corp. has a net margin of 4.49% compared to Quanta Services, Inc.'s net margin of -20.99%. Quanta Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.57% beat Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of 79.39%.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $476.63, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand Fluor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.03%. Given that Fluor Corp. has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, Inc., analysts believe Fluor Corp. is more attractive than Quanta Services, Inc..

Quanta Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.106% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.313, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.295%.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.09%. Fluor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services, Inc. pays 6.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quanta Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.6B, which are larger than Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Quanta Services, Inc.'s net income of $342.8M is higher than Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$707M. Notably, Quanta Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 63.29x while Fluor Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services, Inc. is 2.37x versus 0.44x for Fluor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasTec, Inc. has a net margin of 4.49% compared to Quanta Services, Inc.'s net margin of 4.2%. Quanta Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.57% beat MasTec, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.82%.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $476.63, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand MasTec, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $249.11 which suggests that it could grow by 14.18%. Given that MasTec, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, Inc., analysts believe MasTec, Inc. is more attractive than Quanta Services, Inc..

Quanta Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.106% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec, Inc. has a beta of 1.938, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.842%.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.09%. MasTec, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services, Inc. pays 6.14% of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quanta Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.6B, which are larger than MasTec, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4B. Quanta Services, Inc.'s net income of $342.8M is higher than MasTec, Inc.'s net income of $166.5M. Notably, Quanta Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 63.29x while MasTec, Inc.'s PE ratio is 51.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services, Inc. is 2.37x versus 1.25x for MasTec, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.