PCAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins, Inc. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 6.72%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55% beat Cummins, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.96%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.21, signalling downside risk potential of -0.33%. On the other hand Cummins, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $531.63 which suggests that it could grow by 4.92%. Given that Cummins, Inc. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Cummins, Inc. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..

PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins, Inc. has a beta of 1.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.696%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Cummins, Inc. offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins, Inc. pays out 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are smaller than Cummins, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.3B. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M is higher than Cummins, Inc.'s net income of $559M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.84x while Cummins, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 1.99x versus 2.09x for Cummins, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin Corp. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 8.7%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55% beat Lockheed Martin Corp.'s return on equity of 66.18%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.21, signalling downside risk potential of -0.33%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $523.95 which suggests that it could grow by 10.51%. Given that Lockheed Martin Corp. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Lockheed Martin Corp. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..

PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin Corp. has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.085%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Lockheed Martin Corp. offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.45 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin Corp. pays out 57.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin Corp. quarterly revenues of $18.6B. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M is lower than Lockheed Martin Corp.'s net income of $1.6B. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.84x while Lockheed Martin Corp.'s PE ratio is 26.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 1.99x versus 1.52x for Lockheed Martin Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oshkosh Corp. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 7.3%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55% beat Oshkosh Corp.'s return on equity of 15.51%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.21, signalling downside risk potential of -0.33%. On the other hand Oshkosh Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $151.70 which suggests that it could grow by 16.35%. Given that Oshkosh Corp. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Oshkosh Corp. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..

PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh Corp. has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.06%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Oshkosh Corp. offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh Corp. pays out 17.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are larger than Oshkosh Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M is higher than Oshkosh Corp.'s net income of $196.2M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.84x while Oshkosh Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 1.99x versus 0.82x for Oshkosh Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos, Inc. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to PACCAR, Inc.'s net margin of 12.87%. PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55% beat Xos, Inc.'s return on equity of -108.89%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a consensus price target of $111.21, signalling downside risk potential of -0.33%. On the other hand Xos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 238.16%. Given that Xos, Inc. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Xos, Inc. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..

PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.025% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PACCAR, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Xos, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PACCAR, Inc. pays 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.7B, which are larger than Xos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $16.5M. PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M is higher than Xos, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M. Notably, PACCAR, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.84x while Xos, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR, Inc. is 1.99x versus 0.34x for Xos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.