Financhill
Sell
49

AFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$110.13
Seasonality move :
5.63%
Day range:
$108.88 - $111.28
52-week range:
$96.95 - $115.84
Dividend yield:
2.1%
P/E ratio:
14.39x
P/S ratio:
3.39x
P/B ratio:
2.02x
Volume:
6.8M
Avg. volume:
2.7M
1-year change:
9%
Market cap:
$57.8B
Revenue:
$18.9B
EPS (TTM):
$7.67

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
$4.5B $1.78 -18.02% -50.13% $110.69
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
$78.3M $0.56 8.14% -15.48% $49.33
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
$1.5B $4.54 4.49% 13.74% $168.30
MET
MetLife, Inc.
$18.7B $2.32 35.48% 33.26% $93.47
TRUP
Trupanion, Inc.
$361.6M $0.89 10.94% 2572.67% $54.75
UNM
Unum Group
$3.3B $2.15 1.63% 10.32% $94.08
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
$110.36 $110.69 $57.8B 14.39x $0.58 2.1% 3.39x
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
$39.06 $49.33 $739.2M 14.96x $1.39 3.99% 2.41x
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
$139.64 $168.30 $11.1B 10.11x $0.27 0.75% 1.96x
MET
MetLife, Inc.
$81.57 $93.47 $53.7B 15.36x $0.57 2.76% 0.77x
TRUP
Trupanion, Inc.
$38.00 $54.75 $1.6B 106.62x $0.00 0% 1.17x
UNM
Unum Group
$79.24 $94.08 $13.3B 15.44x $0.46 2.22% 1.07x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
23.24% 0.131 14.79% 0.00x
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
-- -0.137 -- 0.00x
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
32.3% 0.007 23.64% 0.00x
MET
MetLife, Inc.
41.14% 1.064 37% 0.00x
TRUP
Trupanion, Inc.
23.71% 1.904 6.13% 0.00x
UNM
Unum Group
25.56% 0.392 28.5% 0.00x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AFL
Aflac, Inc.
-- $2.1B 11.98% 15.66% 42.07% $1.3B
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
-- $17.5M 18.17% 18.18% 21.33% $9.8M
GL
Globe Life, Inc.
-- $521.2M 14.28% 21.72% 31.53% $208.7M
MET
MetLife, Inc.
-- $1.5B 7.96% 13.43% 6.97% $3.6B
TRUP
Trupanion, Inc.
-- $5.9M 3.34% 4.54% 1.8% $23.9M
UNM
Unum Group
-- $107.6M 6.18% 8.25% 1.62% -$402.6M

Aflac, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or AMSF?

    AMERISAFE, Inc. has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 16.86%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat AMERISAFE, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    AMSF
    AMERISAFE, Inc.
    -- $0.72 $274.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or AMSF?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.69, signalling upside risk potential of 0.3%. On the other hand AMERISAFE, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $49.33 which suggests that it could grow by 26.3%. Given that AMERISAFE, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe AMERISAFE, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    AMSF
    AMERISAFE, Inc.
    0 2 0
  • Is AFL or AMSF More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMERISAFE, Inc. has a beta of 0.368, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.16%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or AMSF?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. AMERISAFE, Inc. offers a yield of 3.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.39 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. AMERISAFE, Inc. pays out 51.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or AMSF?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than AMERISAFE, Inc. quarterly revenues of $82M. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than AMERISAFE, Inc.'s net income of $13.8M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.39x while AMERISAFE, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.39x versus 2.41x for AMERISAFE, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.39x 14.39x $4.7B $1.6B
    AMSF
    AMERISAFE, Inc.
    2.41x 14.96x $82M $13.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or GL?

    Globe Life, Inc. has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 25.63%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat Globe Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.72%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    GL
    Globe Life, Inc.
    -- $4.73 $8.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or GL?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.69, signalling upside risk potential of 0.3%. On the other hand Globe Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $168.30 which suggests that it could grow by 20.52%. Given that Globe Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe Globe Life, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    GL
    Globe Life, Inc.
    5 2 0
  • Is AFL or GL More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.927%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or GL?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Globe Life, Inc. offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life, Inc. pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or GL?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Globe Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than Globe Life, Inc.'s net income of $387.8M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.39x while Globe Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.39x versus 1.96x for Globe Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.39x 14.39x $4.7B $1.6B
    GL
    Globe Life, Inc.
    1.96x 10.11x $1.5B $387.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or MET?

    MetLife, Inc. has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 5.2%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    MET
    MetLife, Inc.
    -- $1.22 $49.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or MET?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.69, signalling upside risk potential of 0.3%. On the other hand MetLife, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $93.47 which suggests that it could grow by 14.59%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    MET
    MetLife, Inc.
    9 5 0
  • Is AFL or MET More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.717%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or MET?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. MetLife, Inc. offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife, Inc. pays out 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or MET?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues of $17.4B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.39x while MetLife, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.39x versus 0.77x for MetLife, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.39x 14.39x $4.7B $1.6B
    MET
    MetLife, Inc.
    0.77x 15.36x $17.4B $902M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or TRUP?

    Trupanion, Inc. has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 1.6%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat Trupanion, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.54%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    TRUP
    Trupanion, Inc.
    -- $0.13 $483.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or TRUP?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.69, signalling upside risk potential of 0.3%. On the other hand Trupanion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $54.75 which suggests that it could grow by 44.08%. Given that Trupanion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe Trupanion, Inc. is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    TRUP
    Trupanion, Inc.
    2 3 0
  • Is AFL or TRUP More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion, Inc. has a beta of 1.624, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.431%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or TRUP?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Trupanion, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or TRUP?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Trupanion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $366.9M. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than Trupanion, Inc.'s net income of $5.9M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.39x while Trupanion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 106.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.39x versus 1.17x for Trupanion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.39x 14.39x $4.7B $1.6B
    TRUP
    Trupanion, Inc.
    1.17x 106.62x $366.9M $5.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns AFL or UNM?

    Unum Group has a net margin of 34.58% compared to Aflac, Inc.'s net margin of 1.18%. Aflac, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.66% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 8.25%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    -- $3.08 $37.4B
    UNM
    Unum Group
    -- $0.23 $14.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About AFL or UNM?

    Aflac, Inc. has a consensus price target of $110.69, signalling upside risk potential of 0.3%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.08 which suggests that it could grow by 18.72%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Aflac, Inc., analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Aflac, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    1 7 2
    UNM
    Unum Group
    7 4 0
  • Is AFL or UNM More Risky?

    Aflac, Inc. has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.200, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.988%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AFL or UNM?

    Aflac, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Aflac, Inc. pays 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AFL or UNM?

    Aflac, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Aflac, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B is higher than Unum Group's net income of $39.7M. Notably, Aflac, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.39x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 15.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac, Inc. is 3.39x versus 1.07x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AFL
    Aflac, Inc.
    3.39x 14.39x $4.7B $1.6B
    UNM
    Unum Group
    1.07x 15.44x $3.4B $39.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?

Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…

Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…

Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?

Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…

Stock Ideas

Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Alerts

Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 22

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 2.59% over the past day.

Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 22

BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is down 3.03% over the past day.

Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 22

Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 9.97% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock