YUMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dutch Bros, Inc. has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.57%. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.78% beat Dutch Bros, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.11%.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.02, signalling upside risk potential of 15.93%. On the other hand Dutch Bros, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $77.30 which suggests that it could grow by 45.19%. Given that Dutch Bros, Inc. has higher upside potential than Yum China Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Dutch Bros, Inc. is more attractive than Yum China Holdings, Inc..

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.109, which suggesting that the stock is 89.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dutch Bros, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Dutch Bros, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yum China Holdings, Inc. pays 38.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Dutch Bros, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Dutch Bros, Inc. quarterly revenues of $443.6M. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $153M is higher than Dutch Bros, Inc.'s net income of $29.2M. Notably, Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.41x while Dutch Bros, Inc.'s PE ratio is 83.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings, Inc. is 1.68x versus 4.09x for Dutch Bros, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International, Inc. has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.85%. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.78% beat Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 152.94%.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.02, signalling upside risk potential of 15.93%. On the other hand Brinker International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $191.05 which suggests that it could grow by 34.16%. Given that Brinker International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Yum China Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Brinker International, Inc. is more attractive than Yum China Holdings, Inc..

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.109, which suggesting that the stock is 89.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.344, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.428%.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Brinker International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yum China Holdings, Inc. pays 38.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $153M is higher than Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $128.5M. Notably, Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.41x while Brinker International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings, Inc. is 1.68x versus 1.15x for Brinker International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starbucks Corp. has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 2.96%. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.78% beat Starbucks Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.02, signalling upside risk potential of 15.93%. On the other hand Starbucks Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $100.16 which suggests that it could grow by 3.52%. Given that Yum China Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Starbucks Corp., analysts believe Yum China Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Starbucks Corp..

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.109, which suggesting that the stock is 89.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks Corp. has a beta of 0.930, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.036%.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Starbucks Corp. offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Yum China Holdings, Inc. pays 38.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks Corp. pays out 149.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Starbucks Corp.'s is not.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Starbucks Corp. quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $153M is lower than Starbucks Corp.'s net income of $293.2M. Notably, Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.41x while Starbucks Corp.'s PE ratio is 80.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings, Inc. is 1.68x versus 2.93x for Starbucks Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum! Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 21.28%. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.78% beat Yum! Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.02, signalling upside risk potential of 15.93%. On the other hand Yum! Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $171.75 which suggests that it could grow by 5.42%. Given that Yum China Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Yum! Brands, Inc., analysts believe Yum China Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Yum! Brands, Inc..

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.109, which suggesting that the stock is 89.142% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum! Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.748%.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Yum! Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Yum China Holdings, Inc. pays 38.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum! Brands, Inc. pays out 51.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Yum! Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $153M is lower than Yum! Brands, Inc.'s net income of $535M. Notably, Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.41x while Yum! Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings, Inc. is 1.68x versus 5.57x for Yum! Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.