RH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chewy, Inc. has a net margin of 4.1% compared to RH's net margin of 1.9%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Chewy, Inc.'s return on equity of 60.01%.

RH has a consensus price target of $200.65, signalling upside risk potential of 19.07%. On the other hand Chewy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.57 which suggests that it could grow by 40.39%. Given that Chewy, Inc. has higher upside potential than RH, analysts believe Chewy, Inc. is more attractive than RH.

RH has a beta of 2.095, which suggesting that the stock is 109.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chewy, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.427%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chewy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chewy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $883.8M, which are smaller than Chewy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. RH's net income of $36.3M is lower than Chewy, Inc.'s net income of $59.2M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.82x while Chewy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 67.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.00x versus 1.10x for Chewy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EVgo, Inc. has a net margin of 4.1% compared to RH's net margin of -30.65%. RH's return on equity of -- beat EVgo, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.21%.

RH has a consensus price target of $200.65, signalling upside risk potential of 19.07%. On the other hand EVgo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.54 which suggests that it could grow by 114.57%. Given that EVgo, Inc. has higher upside potential than RH, analysts believe EVgo, Inc. is more attractive than RH.

RH has a beta of 2.095, which suggesting that the stock is 109.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVgo, Inc. has a beta of 2.369, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.883%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EVgo, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EVgo, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $883.8M, which are larger than EVgo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $92.3M. RH's net income of $36.3M is higher than EVgo, Inc.'s net income of -$28.3M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.82x while EVgo, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.00x versus 1.17x for EVgo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wayfair, Inc. has a net margin of 4.1% compared to RH's net margin of -3.18%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Wayfair, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

RH has a consensus price target of $200.65, signalling upside risk potential of 19.07%. On the other hand Wayfair, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $113.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.11%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Wayfair, Inc., analysts believe RH is more attractive than Wayfair, Inc..

RH has a beta of 2.095, which suggesting that the stock is 109.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wayfair, Inc. has a beta of 3.252, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 225.213%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wayfair, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wayfair, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $883.8M, which are smaller than Wayfair, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. RH's net income of $36.3M is higher than Wayfair, Inc.'s net income of -$99M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.82x while Wayfair, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.00x versus 1.06x for Wayfair, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has a net margin of 4.1% compared to RH's net margin of 12.83%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s return on equity of 54.37%.

RH has a consensus price target of $200.65, signalling upside risk potential of 19.07%. On the other hand Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $198.74 which suggests that it could grow by 4.12%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, Inc., analysts believe RH is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma, Inc..

RH has a beta of 2.095, which suggesting that the stock is 109.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has a beta of 1.550, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.044%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. pays out 25.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RH quarterly revenues are $883.8M, which are smaller than Williams-Sonoma, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. RH's net income of $36.3M is lower than Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s net income of $241.6M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.82x while Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 1.00x versus 3.00x for Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.