QD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -127.04% compared to Qudian, Inc.'s net margin of 15.23%. Qudian, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.95% beat LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.28%.

Qudian, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -72.06%. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $5.32 which suggests that it could grow by 61.13%. Given that LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Qudian, Inc., analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Qudian, Inc..

Qudian, Inc. has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 23.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.751%.

Qudian, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 11.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Qudian, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. pays out 16.71% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Qudian, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are smaller than LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $478.2M. Qudian, Inc.'s net income of $57.3M is lower than LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $72.8M. Notably, Qudian, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.72x while LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qudian, Inc. is 51.67x versus 0.31x for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -127.04% compared to Qudian, Inc.'s net margin of --. Qudian, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.95% beat Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Qudian, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -72.06%. On the other hand Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Qudian, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Qudian, Inc. is more attractive than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd..

Qudian, Inc. has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 23.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.902%.

Qudian, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Qudian, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Qudian, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are larger than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Qudian, Inc.'s net income of $57.3M is higher than Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Qudian, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.72x while Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qudian, Inc. is 51.67x versus 3.09x for Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qfin Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -127.04% compared to Qudian, Inc.'s net margin of 27.52%. Qudian, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.95% beat Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77%.

Qudian, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -72.06%. On the other hand Qfin Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.89 which suggests that it could grow by 73.2%. Given that Qfin Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Qudian, Inc., analysts believe Qfin Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Qudian, Inc..

Qudian, Inc. has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 23.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qfin Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.772%.

Qudian, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qfin Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 10.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Qudian, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qfin Holdings, Inc. pays out 22.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Qudian, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are smaller than Qfin Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $727.3M. Qudian, Inc.'s net income of $57.3M is lower than Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $200.1M. Notably, Qudian, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.72x while Qfin Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qudian, Inc. is 51.67x versus 0.97x for Qfin Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waterdrop, Inc. has a net margin of -127.04% compared to Qudian, Inc.'s net margin of 16.26%. Qudian, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.95% beat Waterdrop, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.01%.

Qudian, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -72.06%. On the other hand Waterdrop, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.24 which suggests that it could grow by 15.15%. Given that Waterdrop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Qudian, Inc., analysts believe Waterdrop, Inc. is more attractive than Qudian, Inc..

Qudian, Inc. has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 23.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waterdrop, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Qudian, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Waterdrop, Inc. offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Qudian, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waterdrop, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Qudian, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are smaller than Waterdrop, Inc. quarterly revenues of $137.1M. Qudian, Inc.'s net income of $57.3M is higher than Waterdrop, Inc.'s net income of $22.3M. Notably, Qudian, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.72x while Waterdrop, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qudian, Inc. is 51.67x versus 1.60x for Waterdrop, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.