CVE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FEC Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 9.75% compared to Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s net margin of --. Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.68% beat FEC Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.59%.

Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.17, signalling upside risk potential of 2.69%. On the other hand FEC Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cenovus Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than FEC Resources, Inc., analysts believe Cenovus Energy, Inc. is more attractive than FEC Resources, Inc..

Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.523, which suggesting that the stock is 47.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FEC Resources, Inc. has a beta of 2.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.284%.

Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. FEC Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cenovus Energy, Inc. pays 40.51% of its earnings as a dividend. FEC Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cenovus Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9.6B, which are larger than FEC Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s net income of $933.7M is higher than FEC Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$54.1K. Notably, Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.58x while FEC Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cenovus Energy, Inc. is 0.86x versus -- for FEC Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenfire Resources Ltd. has a net margin of 9.75% compared to Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -6.41%. Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.68% beat Greenfire Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.13%.

Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.17, signalling upside risk potential of 2.69%. On the other hand Greenfire Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $5.71 which suggests that it could grow by 27.32%. Given that Greenfire Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Cenovus Energy, Inc., analysts believe Greenfire Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Cenovus Energy, Inc..

Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.523, which suggesting that the stock is 47.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenfire Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. Greenfire Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cenovus Energy, Inc. pays 40.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenfire Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cenovus Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9.6B, which are larger than Greenfire Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $99.2M. Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s net income of $933.7M is higher than Greenfire Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$6.4M. Notably, Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.58x while Greenfire Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cenovus Energy, Inc. is 0.86x versus 0.81x for Greenfire Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 9.75% compared to Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -13.37%. Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.68% beat Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.72%.

Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.17, signalling upside risk potential of 2.69%. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.14 which suggests that it could grow by 61.9%. Given that Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cenovus Energy, Inc., analysts believe Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Cenovus Energy, Inc..

Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.523, which suggesting that the stock is 47.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.348, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.178%.

Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cenovus Energy, Inc. pays 40.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cenovus Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9.6B, which are larger than Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $149.3M. Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s net income of $933.7M is higher than Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$20M. Notably, Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.58x while Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cenovus Energy, Inc. is 0.86x versus 0.23x for Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil Corp. has a net margin of 9.75% compared to Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 9.32%. Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.68% beat Exxon Mobil Corp.'s return on equity of 11.48%.

Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.17, signalling upside risk potential of 2.69%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $131.56 which suggests that it could grow by 11.35%. Given that Exxon Mobil Corp. has higher upside potential than Cenovus Energy, Inc., analysts believe Exxon Mobil Corp. is more attractive than Cenovus Energy, Inc..

Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.523, which suggesting that the stock is 47.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil Corp. has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.639%.

Cenovus Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. Exxon Mobil Corp. offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Cenovus Energy, Inc. pays 40.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil Corp. pays out 49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cenovus Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9.6B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil Corp. quarterly revenues of $83.4B. Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s net income of $933.7M is lower than Exxon Mobil Corp.'s net income of $7.8B. Notably, Cenovus Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.58x while Exxon Mobil Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cenovus Energy, Inc. is 0.86x versus 1.58x for Exxon Mobil Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.