BBAI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CoreWeave has a net margin of 7.61% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -169.41% beat CoreWeave's return on equity of --.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.67, signalling downside risk potential of -2.25%. On the other hand CoreWeave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than CoreWeave, analysts believe BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than CoreWeave.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreWeave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CoreWeave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreWeave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are larger than CoreWeave quarterly revenues of --. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M is higher than CoreWeave's net income of --. Notably, BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CoreWeave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. is 15.04x versus -- for CoreWeave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Information Services Group, Inc. has a net margin of 7.61% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 4.9%. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -169.41% beat Information Services Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.25%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.67, signalling downside risk potential of -2.25%. On the other hand Information Services Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.67 which suggests that it could grow by 20.05%. Given that Information Services Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Information Services Group, Inc. is more attractive than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc..

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Information Services Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.738%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Information Services Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Information Services Group, Inc. pays out 317.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are smaller than Information Services Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $62.4M. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M is lower than Information Services Group, Inc.'s net income of $3.1M. Notably, BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Information Services Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. is 15.04x versus 1.25x for Information Services Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 7.61% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 40.37%. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -169.41% beat Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.7%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.67, signalling downside risk potential of -2.25%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $185.76 which suggests that it could grow by 2.2%. Given that Palantir Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Palantir Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc..

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.495, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.467%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M is lower than Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $476.7M. Notably, BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 425.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. is 15.04x versus 119.14x for Palantir Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoundHound AI, Inc. has a net margin of 7.61% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -259.87%. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -169.41% beat SoundHound AI, Inc.'s return on equity of -95.85%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.67, signalling downside risk potential of -2.25%. On the other hand SoundHound AI, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.56 which suggests that it could grow by 32.74%. Given that SoundHound AI, Inc. has higher upside potential than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc., analysts believe SoundHound AI, Inc. is more attractive than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc..

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoundHound AI, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoundHound AI, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoundHound AI, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are smaller than SoundHound AI, Inc. quarterly revenues of $42M. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M is higher than SoundHound AI, Inc.'s net income of -$109.3M. Notably, BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SoundHound AI, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. is 15.04x versus 34.46x for SoundHound AI, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.