BBAI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CoreWeave has a net margin of 7.61% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -169.41% beat CoreWeave's return on equity of --.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.67, signalling upside risk potential of 6.5%. On the other hand CoreWeave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than CoreWeave, analysts believe BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than CoreWeave.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreWeave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CoreWeave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreWeave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are larger than CoreWeave quarterly revenues of --. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M is higher than CoreWeave's net income of --. Notably, BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CoreWeave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. is 13.80x versus -- for CoreWeave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 7.61% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.26%. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -169.41% beat Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.51%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.67, signalling upside risk potential of 6.5%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $218.08 which suggests that it could grow by 18.08%. Given that Leidos Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Leidos Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc..

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.583, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.731%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leidos Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings, Inc. pays out 16.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are smaller than Leidos Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5B. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M is lower than Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $369M. Notably, BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. is 13.80x versus 1.40x for Leidos Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 7.61% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 40.37%. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -169.41% beat Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.7%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.67, signalling upside risk potential of 6.5%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $184.65 which suggests that it could fall by -4.51%. Given that BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, Inc., analysts believe BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Palantir Technologies, Inc..

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.495, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.467%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M is lower than Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $476.7M. Notably, BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 452.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. is 13.80x versus 126.75x for Palantir Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoundHound AI, Inc. has a net margin of 7.61% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -259.87%. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -169.41% beat SoundHound AI, Inc.'s return on equity of -95.85%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.67, signalling upside risk potential of 6.5%. On the other hand SoundHound AI, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.19 which suggests that it could grow by 55.97%. Given that SoundHound AI, Inc. has higher upside potential than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc., analysts believe SoundHound AI, Inc. is more attractive than BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc..

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoundHound AI, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoundHound AI, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoundHound AI, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are smaller than SoundHound AI, Inc. quarterly revenues of $42M. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M is higher than SoundHound AI, Inc.'s net income of -$109.3M. Notably, BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SoundHound AI, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. is 13.80x versus 29.76x for SoundHound AI, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.