CFLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CoreWeave has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of --. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat CoreWeave's return on equity of --.

Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.90, signalling upside risk potential of 3.19%. On the other hand CoreWeave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Confluent, Inc. has higher upside potential than CoreWeave, analysts believe Confluent, Inc. is more attractive than CoreWeave.

Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreWeave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CoreWeave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreWeave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than CoreWeave quarterly revenues of --. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is higher than CoreWeave's net income of --. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CoreWeave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.10x versus -- for CoreWeave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Business Machines Corp. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of 10.68%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45%.

Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.90, signalling upside risk potential of 3.19%. On the other hand International Business Machines Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $293.89 which suggests that it could fall by -2.94%. Given that Confluent, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe Confluent, Inc. is more attractive than International Business Machines Corp..

Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.689, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.128%.

Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines Corp. offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines Corp. pays out 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are smaller than International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues of $16.3B. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is lower than International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while International Business Machines Corp.'s PE ratio is 36.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.10x versus 4.38x for International Business Machines Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penguin Solutions has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of --. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat Penguin Solutions's return on equity of --.

Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.90, signalling upside risk potential of 3.19%. On the other hand Penguin Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Confluent, Inc. has higher upside potential than Penguin Solutions, analysts believe Confluent, Inc. is more attractive than Penguin Solutions.

Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penguin Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Penguin Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Penguin Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than Penguin Solutions quarterly revenues of --. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is higher than Penguin Solutions's net income of --. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Penguin Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.10x versus -- for Penguin Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of 13.84%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.02%.

Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.90, signalling upside risk potential of 3.19%. On the other hand Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.26%. Given that Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Confluent, Inc., analysts believe Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Confluent, Inc..

Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.601, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.137%.

Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $42M. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is lower than Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $5.8M. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.10x versus 0.54x for Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.