SPRK.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

37 Capital, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat 37 Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 37 Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than 37 Capital, Inc., analysts believe Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than 37 Capital, Inc..

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.399, which suggesting that the stock is 39.888% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 37 Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.248%.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 37 Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 37 Capital, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 37 Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s net income of -$832.1K is lower than 37 Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$46.9K. Notably, Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 37 Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. is -- versus -- for 37 Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pasinex Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Pasinex Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pasinex Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 425%. Given that Pasinex Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Pasinex Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc..

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.399, which suggesting that the stock is 39.888% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pasinex Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.102%.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pasinex Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pasinex Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pasinex Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s net income of -$832.1K is lower than Pasinex Resources Ltd.'s net income of $43K. Notably, Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pasinex Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Pasinex Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Renforth Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 700%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc..

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.399, which suggesting that the stock is 39.888% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.447%.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s net income of -$832.1K is lower than Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K. Notably, Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renforth Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Renforth Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -10.32%.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp., analysts believe Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp..

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.399, which suggesting that the stock is 39.888% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.792%.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s net income of -$832.1K is lower than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s net income of -$814K. Notably, Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. is -- versus 5,524.25x for St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.