ZAU.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s net margin of 25.53%. Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.

Zodiac Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Zodiac Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe Zodiac Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..

Zodiac Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.155%.

Zodiac Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zodiac Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zodiac Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zodiac Gold, Inc. is -- versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cabral Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Cabral Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -123.02%.

Zodiac Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cabral Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.70 which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cabral Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Zodiac Gold, Inc., analysts believe Cabral Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Zodiac Gold, Inc..

Zodiac Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cabral Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.674, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.441%.

Zodiac Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cabral Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zodiac Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cabral Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zodiac Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cabral Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Cabral Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cabral Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zodiac Gold, Inc. is -- versus -- for Cabral Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -74.66%. Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.

Zodiac Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 246.15%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Zodiac Gold, Inc., analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. is more attractive than Zodiac Gold, Inc..

Zodiac Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.342%.

Zodiac Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zodiac Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zodiac Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zodiac Gold, Inc. is -- versus 3.05x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Organic Potash Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Organic Potash Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Zodiac Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Organic Potash Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Zodiac Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Organic Potash Corp., analysts believe Zodiac Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Organic Potash Corp..

Zodiac Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash Corp. has a beta of -0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 166.29%.

Zodiac Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zodiac Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zodiac Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Organic Potash Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Organic Potash Corp.'s net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Zodiac Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Organic Potash Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zodiac Gold, Inc. is -- versus -- for Organic Potash Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.