WRR.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lithium Chile, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Walker River Resources Corp.'s net margin of --. Walker River Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -6.3% beat Lithium Chile, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.6%.

Walker River Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lithium Chile, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.2800 which suggests that it could grow by 132.73%. Given that Lithium Chile, Inc. has higher upside potential than Walker River Resources Corp., analysts believe Lithium Chile, Inc. is more attractive than Walker River Resources Corp..

Walker River Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithium Chile, Inc. has a beta of 0.459, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.058%.

Walker River Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithium Chile, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Walker River Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithium Chile, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Walker River Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lithium Chile, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Walker River Resources Corp.'s net income of -$235.4K is lower than Lithium Chile, Inc.'s net income of $2M. Notably, Walker River Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lithium Chile, Inc.'s PE ratio is 64.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walker River Resources Corp. is -- versus -- for Lithium Chile, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Walker River Resources Corp.'s net margin of --. Walker River Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -6.3% beat Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s return on equity of 178.8%.

Walker River Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 661.91%. Given that Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has higher upside potential than Walker River Resources Corp., analysts believe Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. is more attractive than Walker River Resources Corp..

Walker River Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.057%.

Walker River Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share. Walker River Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Walker River Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Walker River Resources Corp.'s net income of -$235.4K is higher than Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s net income of -$260.6K. Notably, Walker River Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walker River Resources Corp. is -- versus -- for Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Minco Silver Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Walker River Resources Corp.'s net margin of --. Walker River Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -6.3% beat Minco Silver Corp.'s return on equity of 19.48%.

Walker River Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Minco Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.11%. Given that Minco Silver Corp. has higher upside potential than Walker River Resources Corp., analysts believe Minco Silver Corp. is more attractive than Walker River Resources Corp..

Walker River Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Minco Silver Corp. has a beta of 0.311, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.945%.

Walker River Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Minco Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Walker River Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Minco Silver Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Walker River Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Minco Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Walker River Resources Corp.'s net income of -$235.4K is lower than Minco Silver Corp.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, Walker River Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Minco Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walker River Resources Corp. is -- versus -- for Minco Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thor Explorations Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Walker River Resources Corp.'s net margin of 61.68%. Walker River Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -6.3% beat Thor Explorations Ltd.'s return on equity of 67.69%.

Walker River Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Thor Explorations Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $1.8400 which suggests that it could grow by 38.35%. Given that Thor Explorations Ltd. has higher upside potential than Walker River Resources Corp., analysts believe Thor Explorations Ltd. is more attractive than Walker River Resources Corp..

Walker River Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Explorations Ltd. has a beta of 1.649, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.902%.

Walker River Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Thor Explorations Ltd. offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Walker River Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Explorations Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Walker River Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Thor Explorations Ltd. quarterly revenues of $96.2M. Walker River Resources Corp.'s net income of -$235.4K is lower than Thor Explorations Ltd.'s net income of $59.4M. Notably, Walker River Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Thor Explorations Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walker River Resources Corp. is -- versus 2.24x for Thor Explorations Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.