RMB.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boyd Group Services, Inc. has a net margin of 10.6% compared to Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 1.37%. Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -56.93% beat Boyd Group Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.89%.

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Boyd Group Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $269.73 which suggests that it could grow by 21.74%. Given that Boyd Group Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rumbu Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Boyd Group Services, Inc. is more attractive than Rumbu Holdings Ltd..

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boyd Group Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.443, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.736%.

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boyd Group Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Rumbu Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Group Services, Inc. pays out 38.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Group Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.7M, which are smaller than Boyd Group Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $183.6K is lower than Boyd Group Services, Inc.'s net income of $14.9M. Notably, Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Boyd Group Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 215.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rumbu Holdings Ltd. is 2.56x versus 1.10x for Boyd Group Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Green River Gold Corp. has a net margin of 10.6% compared to Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -1812.76%. Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -56.93% beat Green River Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -30.22%.

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Green River Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Green River Gold Corp., analysts believe Rumbu Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Green River Gold Corp..

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green River Gold Corp. has a beta of -1.231, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 223.099%.

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Green River Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rumbu Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Green River Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.7M, which are larger than Green River Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $10K. Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $183.6K is higher than Green River Gold Corp.'s net income of -$129K. Notably, Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Green River Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rumbu Holdings Ltd. is 2.56x versus 22.25x for Green River Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goodfood Market Corp. has a net margin of 10.6% compared to Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 0.18%. Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -56.93% beat Goodfood Market Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Goodfood Market Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $0.25 which suggests that it could fall by -16.67%. Given that Goodfood Market Corp. has higher upside potential than Rumbu Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Goodfood Market Corp. is more attractive than Rumbu Holdings Ltd..

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodfood Market Corp. has a beta of 0.671, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.918%.

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goodfood Market Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rumbu Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goodfood Market Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.7M, which are smaller than Goodfood Market Corp. quarterly revenues of $25M. Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $183.6K is higher than Goodfood Market Corp.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goodfood Market Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rumbu Holdings Ltd. is 2.56x versus 0.22x for Goodfood Market Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JIVA Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 10.6% compared to Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -20.27%. Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -56.93% beat JIVA Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JIVA Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than JIVA Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Rumbu Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than JIVA Technologies, Inc..

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JIVA Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.82%.

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JIVA Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rumbu Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JIVA Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rumbu Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.7M, which are larger than JIVA Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3M. Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $183.6K is higher than JIVA Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$262.4K. Notably, Rumbu Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JIVA Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rumbu Holdings Ltd. is 2.56x versus 0.01x for JIVA Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.