PA.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Palamina Corp.'s net margin of --. Palamina Corp.'s return on equity of -1300.66% beat Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of -1103.05%.

Palamina Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 255.56%. On the other hand Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Palamina Corp. has higher upside potential than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp., analysts believe Palamina Corp. is more attractive than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp..

Palamina Corp. has a beta of 2.801, which suggesting that the stock is 180.124% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Palamina Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palamina Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palamina Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Palamina Corp.'s net income of -$403.2K is higher than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Palamina Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.18x while Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palamina Corp. is -- versus -- for Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Palamina Corp.'s net margin of 25.53%. Palamina Corp.'s return on equity of -1300.66% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.

Palamina Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 255.56%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Palamina Corp. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe Palamina Corp. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..

Palamina Corp. has a beta of 2.801, which suggesting that the stock is 180.124% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.573%.

Palamina Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palamina Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palamina Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Palamina Corp.'s net income of -$403.2K is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, Palamina Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.18x while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palamina Corp. is -- versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Palamina Corp.'s net margin of -74.66%. Palamina Corp.'s return on equity of -1300.66% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.

Palamina Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 255.56%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 260%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Palamina Corp., analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. is more attractive than Palamina Corp..

Palamina Corp. has a beta of 2.801, which suggesting that the stock is 180.124% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.18%.

Palamina Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palamina Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palamina Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. Palamina Corp.'s net income of -$403.2K is higher than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Palamina Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.18x while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palamina Corp. is -- versus 2.93x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Organic Potash Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Palamina Corp.'s net margin of --. Palamina Corp.'s return on equity of -1300.66% beat Organic Potash Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Palamina Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 255.56%. On the other hand Organic Potash Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Palamina Corp. has higher upside potential than Organic Potash Corp., analysts believe Palamina Corp. is more attractive than Organic Potash Corp..

Palamina Corp. has a beta of 2.801, which suggesting that the stock is 180.124% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash Corp. has a beta of -0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 166.856%.

Palamina Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palamina Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palamina Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Organic Potash Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Palamina Corp.'s net income of -$403.2K is lower than Organic Potash Corp.'s net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Palamina Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.18x while Organic Potash Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palamina Corp. is -- versus -- for Organic Potash Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.