Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
40
MGM.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.80
Seasonality move
:
-2.43%
Day range:
$1.74 - $1.77
52-week range:
$0.50 - $1.99
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
11.05x
Volume:
24.6K
Avg. volume:
82.1K
1-year change:
252%
Market cap:
$82.3M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.07
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGM.V
Maple Gold Mines Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SURE.CX
SureNano Science Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGM.V
Maple Gold Mines Ltd.
|
$1.80 | $0.20 | $82.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
$0.66 | -- | $15M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.35x |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
$0.14 | -- | $21.7M | 151.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.17x |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $605.6K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SURE.CX
SureNano Science Ltd.
|
$0.3300 | -- | $7.9M | 10.00x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGM.V
Maple Gold Mines Ltd.
|
3.18% | 2.161 | 0.43% | 8.24x |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | 9.716 | -- | 5.08x |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
21.47% | 0.000 | 5.8% | 0.39x |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
41.88% | 2.524 | 33.1% | 0.25x |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SURE.CX
SureNano Science Ltd.
|
-- | 0.959 | -- | 1.22x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGM.V
Maple Gold Mines Ltd.
|
-$37.1K | -$2M | -93.02% | -98.57% | -- | -$464.7K |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -$1.2M | -1103.05% | -1103.05% | -- | -$630.9K |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
$50K | -$390.8K | -138.99% | -167.71% | 88.71% | $38.2K |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
-$558.4K | -$1.2M | -45.73% | -65.23% | -60.25% | -$630.3K |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | -$16.2K | -- | -- | -- | -$43.6K |
|
SURE.CX
SureNano Science Ltd.
|
-$600 | -$35.5K | -- | -- | -- | -$102.4K |
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MGM.V or ARGO.CX?
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of -98.57% beat Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of -1103.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.-- -$0.04 $7.7M ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.-- -$0.06 $468.6K -
What do Analysts Say About MGM.V or ARGO.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $0.20, signalling upside risk potential of 11.11%. On the other hand Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp., analysts believe Maple Gold Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.0 0 0 ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.0 0 0 -
Is MGM.V or ARGO.CX More Risky?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.828, which suggesting that the stock is 82.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGM.V or ARGO.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maple Gold Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGM.V or ARGO.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s net income of -$1.6M is lower than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maple Gold Mines Ltd. is -- versus -- for Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.-- -- -- -$1.6M ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.-- -- -- -$1.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns MGM.V or BEE.CX?
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s net margin of 25.53%. Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of -98.57% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.-- -$0.04 $7.7M BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.61.05% $0.00 $1.4M -
What do Analysts Say About MGM.V or BEE.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $0.20, signalling upside risk potential of 11.11%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe Maple Gold Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.0 0 0 BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is MGM.V or BEE.CX More Risky?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.828, which suggesting that the stock is 82.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.155%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGM.V or BEE.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maple Gold Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGM.V or BEE.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s net income of -$1.6M is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maple Gold Mines Ltd. is -- versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.-- -- -- -$1.6M BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.2.35x -- $81.9K $20.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns MGM.V or ERTH.CX?
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s net margin of -74.66%. Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of -98.57% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.-- -$0.04 $7.7M ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.-28.19% -$0.01 $15.2M -
What do Analysts Say About MGM.V or ERTH.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $0.20, signalling upside risk potential of 11.11%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 246.15%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Maple Gold Mines Ltd., analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. is more attractive than Maple Gold Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.0 0 0 ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.0 0 0 -
Is MGM.V or ERTH.CX More Risky?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.828, which suggesting that the stock is 82.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.342%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGM.V or ERTH.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maple Gold Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGM.V or ERTH.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s net income of -$1.6M is lower than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maple Gold Mines Ltd. is -- versus 3.17x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.-- -- -- -$1.6M ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.3.17x 151.77x $2M -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns MGM.V or OPC.CX?
Organic Potash Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of -98.57% beat Organic Potash Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.-- -$0.04 $7.7M OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.-- -$0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About MGM.V or OPC.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $0.20, signalling upside risk potential of 11.11%. On the other hand Organic Potash Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Organic Potash Corp., analysts believe Maple Gold Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Organic Potash Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.0 0 0 OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.0 0 0 -
Is MGM.V or OPC.CX More Risky?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.828, which suggesting that the stock is 82.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash Corp. has a beta of -0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 166.29%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGM.V or OPC.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maple Gold Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGM.V or OPC.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Organic Potash Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s net income of -$1.6M is lower than Organic Potash Corp.'s net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Organic Potash Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maple Gold Mines Ltd. is -- versus -- for Organic Potash Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.-- -- -- -$1.6M OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.-- -- -- -$23.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns MGM.V or SURE.CX?
SureNano Science Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of -98.57% beat SureNano Science Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.-- -$0.04 $7.7M SURE.CXSureNano Science Ltd.-- -$0.00 $58K -
What do Analysts Say About MGM.V or SURE.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $0.20, signalling upside risk potential of 11.11%. On the other hand SureNano Science Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than SureNano Science Ltd., analysts believe Maple Gold Mines Ltd. is more attractive than SureNano Science Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.0 0 0 SURE.CXSureNano Science Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is MGM.V or SURE.CX More Risky?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.828, which suggesting that the stock is 82.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SureNano Science Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGM.V or SURE.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SureNano Science Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maple Gold Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SureNano Science Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGM.V or SURE.CX?
Maple Gold Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SureNano Science Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s net income of -$1.6M is lower than SureNano Science Ltd.'s net income of -$35.5K. Notably, Maple Gold Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SureNano Science Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maple Gold Mines Ltd. is -- versus -- for SureNano Science Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGM.VMaple Gold Mines Ltd.-- -- -- -$1.6M SURE.CXSureNano Science Ltd.-- 10.00x -- -$35.5K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
55
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
45
CTEV alert for Jan 2
Claritev Corp. [CTEV] is down 20.7% over the past day.
Sell
47
ASTS alert for Jan 2
AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is up 14.94% over the past day.
Buy
60
BIDU alert for Jan 3
Baidu, Inc. [BIDU] is up 15.01% over the past day.
