Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
45
LIFT.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$4.32
Seasonality move
:
70%
Day range:
$4.31 - $4.49
52-week range:
$1.40 - $5.15
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
66.75x
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
0.77x
Volume:
8.3K
Avg. volume:
65.4K
1-year change:
69.41%
Market cap:
$204.6M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LIFT.V
Li-FT Power Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $6.90 |
|
APKI.CX
AAPKI Ventures, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ARMY.CX
Armory Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRM.CX
Great Republic Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEGA.CX
MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NXU.X.CX
Nexco Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LIFT.V
Li-FT Power Ltd.
|
$4.32 | $6.90 | $204.6M | 66.75x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
APKI.CX
AAPKI Ventures, Inc.
|
$0.07 | -- | $5.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 160.19x |
|
ARMY.CX
Armory Mining Corp.
|
$0.06 | -- | $3.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GRM.CX
Great Republic Mining Corp.
|
$0.01 | -- | $184.3K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MEGA.CX
MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp.
|
$0.02 | -- | $558.8K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NXU.X.CX
Nexco Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0100 | -- | $358.6K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LIFT.V
Li-FT Power Ltd.
|
0.03% | 2.175 | 0.06% | 3.02x |
|
APKI.CX
AAPKI Ventures, Inc.
|
10.98% | 0.000 | 5.64% | 0.01x |
|
ARMY.CX
Armory Mining Corp.
|
1.55% | -0.684 | 1.67% | 0.49x |
|
GRM.CX
Great Republic Mining Corp.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MEGA.CX
MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp.
|
-85.19% | 3.992 | 16.67% | 0.02x |
|
NXU.X.CX
Nexco Resources, Inc.
|
-- | 0.433 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LIFT.V
Li-FT Power Ltd.
|
-$41K | -$803K | -0.5% | -0.5% | -- | -$4.7M |
|
APKI.CX
AAPKI Ventures, Inc.
|
-$1.6K | -$8.7K | -15.19% | -17.14% | -- | -$45.5K |
|
ARMY.CX
Armory Mining Corp.
|
-- | -$531.7K | -59.79% | -60.45% | -- | -$675.1K |
|
GRM.CX
Great Republic Mining Corp.
|
-- | -$8.6K | -- | -- | -- | -$5.5K |
|
MEGA.CX
MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp.
|
-- | -$53.4K | -168.36% | -174.71% | -- | $4.5K |
|
NXU.X.CX
Nexco Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$56.4K | -- | -- | -- | -$5K |
Li-FT Power Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LIFT.V or APKI.CX?
AAPKI Ventures, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Li-FT Power Ltd.'s net margin of --. Li-FT Power Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.5% beat AAPKI Ventures, Inc.'s return on equity of -17.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.-- $0.11 $265.3M APKI.CXAAPKI Ventures, Inc.-- -- $2.6M -
What do Analysts Say About LIFT.V or APKI.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a consensus price target of $6.90, signalling upside risk potential of 59.72%. On the other hand AAPKI Ventures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Li-FT Power Ltd. has higher upside potential than AAPKI Ventures, Inc., analysts believe Li-FT Power Ltd. is more attractive than AAPKI Ventures, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.1 0 0 APKI.CXAAPKI Ventures, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LIFT.V or APKI.CX More Risky?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AAPKI Ventures, Inc. has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.986%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIFT.V or APKI.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AAPKI Ventures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li-FT Power Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAPKI Ventures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LIFT.V or APKI.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AAPKI Ventures, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Li-FT Power Ltd.'s net income of $5M is higher than AAPKI Ventures, Inc.'s net income of -$152.8K. Notably, Li-FT Power Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.75x while AAPKI Ventures, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li-FT Power Ltd. is -- versus 160.19x for AAPKI Ventures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.-- 66.75x -- $5M APKI.CXAAPKI Ventures, Inc.160.19x -- -- -$152.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns LIFT.V or ARMY.CX?
Armory Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Li-FT Power Ltd.'s net margin of --. Li-FT Power Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.5% beat Armory Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -60.45%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.-- $0.11 $265.3M ARMY.CXArmory Mining Corp.-- -$0.01 $4.8M -
What do Analysts Say About LIFT.V or ARMY.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a consensus price target of $6.90, signalling upside risk potential of 59.72%. On the other hand Armory Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Li-FT Power Ltd. has higher upside potential than Armory Mining Corp., analysts believe Li-FT Power Ltd. is more attractive than Armory Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.1 0 0 ARMY.CXArmory Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is LIFT.V or ARMY.CX More Risky?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Armory Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.894, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.398%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIFT.V or ARMY.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Armory Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li-FT Power Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armory Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LIFT.V or ARMY.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Armory Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Li-FT Power Ltd.'s net income of $5M is higher than Armory Mining Corp.'s net income of -$532.1K. Notably, Li-FT Power Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.75x while Armory Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li-FT Power Ltd. is -- versus -- for Armory Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.-- 66.75x -- $5M ARMY.CXArmory Mining Corp.-- -- -- -$532.1K
-
Which has Higher Returns LIFT.V or GRM.CX?
Great Republic Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Li-FT Power Ltd.'s net margin of --. Li-FT Power Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.5% beat Great Republic Mining Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.-- $0.11 $265.3M GRM.CXGreat Republic Mining Corp.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LIFT.V or GRM.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a consensus price target of $6.90, signalling upside risk potential of 59.72%. On the other hand Great Republic Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Li-FT Power Ltd. has higher upside potential than Great Republic Mining Corp., analysts believe Li-FT Power Ltd. is more attractive than Great Republic Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.1 0 0 GRM.CXGreat Republic Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is LIFT.V or GRM.CX More Risky?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Republic Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIFT.V or GRM.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Republic Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li-FT Power Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Republic Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LIFT.V or GRM.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Great Republic Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Li-FT Power Ltd.'s net income of $5M is higher than Great Republic Mining Corp.'s net income of -$8.6K. Notably, Li-FT Power Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.75x while Great Republic Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li-FT Power Ltd. is -- versus -- for Great Republic Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.-- 66.75x -- $5M GRM.CXGreat Republic Mining Corp.-- -- -- -$8.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns LIFT.V or MEGA.CX?
MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Li-FT Power Ltd.'s net margin of --. Li-FT Power Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.5% beat MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -174.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.-- $0.11 $265.3M MEGA.CXMegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp.-- -$0.08 -$145.8K -
What do Analysts Say About LIFT.V or MEGA.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a consensus price target of $6.90, signalling upside risk potential of 59.72%. On the other hand MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Li-FT Power Ltd. has higher upside potential than MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp., analysts believe Li-FT Power Ltd. is more attractive than MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.1 0 0 MEGA.CXMegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp.0 0 0 -
Is LIFT.V or MEGA.CX More Risky?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.177%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIFT.V or MEGA.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li-FT Power Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LIFT.V or MEGA.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Li-FT Power Ltd.'s net income of $5M is higher than MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp.'s net income of -$3M. Notably, Li-FT Power Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.75x while MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li-FT Power Ltd. is -- versus -- for MegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.-- 66.75x -- $5M MEGA.CXMegaWatt Lithium & Battery Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$3M
-
Which has Higher Returns LIFT.V or NXU.X.CX?
Nexco Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Li-FT Power Ltd.'s net margin of --. Li-FT Power Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.5% beat Nexco Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.-- $0.11 $265.3M NXU.X.CXNexco Resources, Inc.-- -$0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About LIFT.V or NXU.X.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a consensus price target of $6.90, signalling upside risk potential of 59.72%. On the other hand Nexco Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Li-FT Power Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nexco Resources, Inc., analysts believe Li-FT Power Ltd. is more attractive than Nexco Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.1 0 0 NXU.X.CXNexco Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LIFT.V or NXU.X.CX More Risky?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nexco Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.965, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.522%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LIFT.V or NXU.X.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nexco Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li-FT Power Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nexco Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LIFT.V or NXU.X.CX?
Li-FT Power Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Nexco Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Li-FT Power Ltd.'s net income of $5M is higher than Nexco Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$107K. Notably, Li-FT Power Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.75x while Nexco Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li-FT Power Ltd. is -- versus -- for Nexco Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LIFT.VLi-FT Power Ltd.-- 66.75x -- $5M NXU.X.CXNexco Resources, Inc.-- -- -- -$107K
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Buy
78
TVTX alert for Dec 27
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is down 1.54% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
