Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
74
ICM.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.21
Seasonality move
:
19.87%
Day range:
$0.19 - $0.21
52-week range:
$0.01 - $0.33
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
140.00x
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
88.11x
Volume:
639.3K
Avg. volume:
1.9M
1-year change:
925%
Market cap:
$31.9M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ICM.V
Iconic Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SURE.CX
SureNano Science Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ICM.V
Iconic Minerals Ltd.
|
$0.21 | -- | $31.9M | 140.00x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
$0.65 | -- | $14.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.35x |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
$0.13 | -- | $20.9M | 151.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.05x |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $605.6K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SURE.CX
SureNano Science Ltd.
|
$0.3250 | -- | $7.8M | 10.00x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ICM.V
Iconic Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -5.826 | -- | 0.49x |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | 9.716 | -- | 5.08x |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
21.47% | 0.000 | 5.8% | 0.39x |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
41.88% | 2.524 | 33.1% | 0.25x |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SURE.CX
SureNano Science Ltd.
|
-- | 0.959 | -- | 1.22x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ICM.V
Iconic Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -$210.4K | -33.62% | -33.62% | -- | -$85.1K |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -$1.2M | -1103.05% | -1103.05% | -- | -$630.9K |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
$50K | -$390.8K | -138.99% | -167.71% | 88.71% | $38.2K |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
-$558.4K | -$1.2M | -45.73% | -65.23% | -60.25% | -$630.3K |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | -$16.2K | -- | -- | -- | -$43.6K |
|
SURE.CX
SureNano Science Ltd.
|
-$600 | -$35.5K | -- | -- | -- | -$102.4K |
Iconic Minerals Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ICM.V or ARGO.CX?
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -33.62% beat Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of -1103.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.00 $858.2K ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.-- -$0.06 $468.6K -
What do Analysts Say About ICM.V or ARGO.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Iconic Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp., analysts believe Iconic Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.0 0 0 ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.0 0 0 -
Is ICM.V or ARGO.CX More Risky?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.310, which suggesting that the stock is 31.03% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ICM.V or ARGO.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iconic Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ICM.V or ARGO.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$359.3K is higher than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 140.00x while Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iconic Minerals Ltd. is -- versus -- for Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.-- 140.00x -- -$359.3K ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.-- -- -- -$1.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns ICM.V or BEE.CX?
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 25.53%. Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -33.62% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.00 $858.2K BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.61.05% $0.00 $1.4M -
What do Analysts Say About ICM.V or BEE.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Iconic Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe Iconic Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.0 0 0 BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ICM.V or BEE.CX More Risky?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.310, which suggesting that the stock is 31.03% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.155%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ICM.V or BEE.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iconic Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ICM.V or BEE.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$359.3K is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 140.00x while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iconic Minerals Ltd. is -- versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.-- 140.00x -- -$359.3K BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.2.35x -- $81.9K $20.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns ICM.V or ERTH.CX?
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of -74.66%. Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -33.62% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.00 $858.2K ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.-28.19% -$0.01 $15.2M -
What do Analysts Say About ICM.V or ERTH.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 246.15%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Iconic Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. is more attractive than Iconic Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.0 0 0 ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.0 0 0 -
Is ICM.V or ERTH.CX More Risky?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.310, which suggesting that the stock is 31.03% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.342%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ICM.V or ERTH.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iconic Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ICM.V or ERTH.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$359.3K is higher than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 140.00x while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iconic Minerals Ltd. is -- versus 3.05x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.-- 140.00x -- -$359.3K ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.3.05x 151.77x $2M -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns ICM.V or OPC.CX?
Organic Potash Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -33.62% beat Organic Potash Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.00 $858.2K OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.-- -$0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About ICM.V or OPC.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Organic Potash Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Iconic Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Organic Potash Corp., analysts believe Iconic Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Organic Potash Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.0 0 0 OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.0 0 0 -
Is ICM.V or OPC.CX More Risky?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.310, which suggesting that the stock is 31.03% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash Corp. has a beta of -0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 166.29%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ICM.V or OPC.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iconic Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ICM.V or OPC.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Organic Potash Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$359.3K is lower than Organic Potash Corp.'s net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 140.00x while Organic Potash Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iconic Minerals Ltd. is -- versus -- for Organic Potash Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.-- 140.00x -- -$359.3K OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.-- -- -- -$23.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns ICM.V or SURE.CX?
SureNano Science Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -33.62% beat SureNano Science Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.00 $858.2K SURE.CXSureNano Science Ltd.-- -$0.00 $58K -
What do Analysts Say About ICM.V or SURE.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SureNano Science Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Iconic Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than SureNano Science Ltd., analysts believe Iconic Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than SureNano Science Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.0 0 0 SURE.CXSureNano Science Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ICM.V or SURE.CX More Risky?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.310, which suggesting that the stock is 31.03% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SureNano Science Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ICM.V or SURE.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SureNano Science Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Iconic Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SureNano Science Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ICM.V or SURE.CX?
Iconic Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SureNano Science Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$359.3K is lower than SureNano Science Ltd.'s net income of -$35.5K. Notably, Iconic Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 140.00x while SureNano Science Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iconic Minerals Ltd. is -- versus -- for SureNano Science Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ICM.VIconic Minerals Ltd.-- 140.00x -- -$359.3K SURE.CXSureNano Science Ltd.-- 10.00x -- -$35.5K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
65
RGC alert for Jan 9
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 8.91% over the past day.
Buy
58
KRUS alert for Jan 9
Kura Sushi USA, Inc. [KRUS] is up 0.28% over the past day.
Buy
53
PBF alert for Jan 9
PBF Energy, Inc. [PBF] is down 1.06% over the past day.
