Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
44
GRZ.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.20
Seasonality move
:
3.58%
Day range:
$2.09 - $2.51
52-week range:
$1.45 - $5.93
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
2.62x
Volume:
34.4K
Avg. volume:
21.9K
1-year change:
12.82%
Market cap:
$263.8M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.35
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRZ.V
Gold Reserve Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RML.V
Rusoro Mining Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRZ.V
Gold Reserve Ltd.
|
$2.15 | -- | $263.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
$0.64 | -- | $14.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.35x |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
$0.12 | -- | $19.3M | 151.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.81x |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $605.6K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RML.V
Rusoro Mining Ltd.
|
$0.95 | -- | $595.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 7.21x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRZ.V
Gold Reserve Ltd.
|
0.32% | -2.102 | 0.12% | 4.55x |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | 0.758 | -- | 5.08x |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
21.47% | 2.951 | 5.8% | 0.39x |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
41.88% | 2.344 | 33.1% | 0.25x |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
RML.V
Rusoro Mining Ltd.
|
-78.79% | 2.030 | 15.06% | 0.01x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRZ.V
Gold Reserve Ltd.
|
-$62.1K | -$3.3M | -44.81% | -44.87% | -- | -$8.6M |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -$1.2M | -1103.05% | -1103.05% | -- | -$630.9K |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
$50K | -$390.8K | -138.99% | -167.71% | 88.71% | $38.2K |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
-$558.4K | -$1.2M | -45.73% | -65.23% | -60.25% | -$630.3K |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | -$16.2K | -- | -- | -- | -$43.6K |
|
RML.V
Rusoro Mining Ltd.
|
-- | -$2.5M | -- | -- | -- | -$2M |
Gold Reserve Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GRZ.V or ARGO.CX?
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Gold Reserve Ltd.'s net margin of --. Gold Reserve Ltd.'s return on equity of -44.87% beat Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of -1103.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.-- -$0.11 $101M ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.-- -$0.06 $468.6K -
What do Analysts Say About GRZ.V or ARGO.CX?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gold Reserve Ltd. has higher upside potential than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp., analysts believe Gold Reserve Ltd. is more attractive than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.0 0 0 ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.0 0 0 -
Is GRZ.V or ARGO.CX More Risky?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a beta of -0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 168.327% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRZ.V or ARGO.CX?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Reserve Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRZ.V or ARGO.CX?
Gold Reserve Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Gold Reserve Ltd.'s net income of -$12.8M is lower than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Gold Reserve Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Reserve Ltd. is -- versus -- for Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.-- -- -- -$12.8M ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.-- -- -- -$1.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns GRZ.V or BEE.CX?
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Gold Reserve Ltd.'s net margin of 25.53%. Gold Reserve Ltd.'s return on equity of -44.87% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.-- -$0.11 $101M BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.61.05% $0.00 $1.4M -
What do Analysts Say About GRZ.V or BEE.CX?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gold Reserve Ltd. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe Gold Reserve Ltd. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.0 0 0 BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GRZ.V or BEE.CX More Risky?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a beta of -0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 168.327% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.573%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRZ.V or BEE.CX?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Reserve Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRZ.V or BEE.CX?
Gold Reserve Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Gold Reserve Ltd.'s net income of -$12.8M is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, Gold Reserve Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Reserve Ltd. is -- versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.-- -- -- -$12.8M BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.2.35x -- $81.9K $20.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns GRZ.V or ERTH.CX?
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Gold Reserve Ltd.'s net margin of -74.66%. Gold Reserve Ltd.'s return on equity of -44.87% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.-- -$0.11 $101M ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.-28.19% -$0.01 $15.2M -
What do Analysts Say About GRZ.V or ERTH.CX?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 275%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Gold Reserve Ltd., analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. is more attractive than Gold Reserve Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.0 0 0 ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.0 0 0 -
Is GRZ.V or ERTH.CX More Risky?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a beta of -0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 168.327% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.18%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRZ.V or ERTH.CX?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Reserve Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRZ.V or ERTH.CX?
Gold Reserve Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. Gold Reserve Ltd.'s net income of -$12.8M is lower than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Gold Reserve Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Reserve Ltd. is -- versus 2.81x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.-- -- -- -$12.8M ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.2.81x 151.77x $2M -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns GRZ.V or OPC.CX?
Organic Potash Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Gold Reserve Ltd.'s net margin of --. Gold Reserve Ltd.'s return on equity of -44.87% beat Organic Potash Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.-- -$0.11 $101M OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.-- -$0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About GRZ.V or OPC.CX?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Organic Potash Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gold Reserve Ltd. has higher upside potential than Organic Potash Corp., analysts believe Gold Reserve Ltd. is more attractive than Organic Potash Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.0 0 0 OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.0 0 0 -
Is GRZ.V or OPC.CX More Risky?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a beta of -0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 168.327% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash Corp. has a beta of -0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 166.856%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRZ.V or OPC.CX?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Reserve Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRZ.V or OPC.CX?
Gold Reserve Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Organic Potash Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Gold Reserve Ltd.'s net income of -$12.8M is lower than Organic Potash Corp.'s net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Gold Reserve Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Organic Potash Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Reserve Ltd. is -- versus -- for Organic Potash Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.-- -- -- -$12.8M OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.-- -- -- -$23.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns GRZ.V or RML.V?
Rusoro Mining Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Gold Reserve Ltd.'s net margin of --. Gold Reserve Ltd.'s return on equity of -44.87% beat Rusoro Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.-- -$0.11 $101M RML.VRusoro Mining Ltd.-- $0.03 -$174.3M -
What do Analysts Say About GRZ.V or RML.V?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rusoro Mining Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.26%. Given that Rusoro Mining Ltd. has higher upside potential than Gold Reserve Ltd., analysts believe Rusoro Mining Ltd. is more attractive than Gold Reserve Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.0 0 0 RML.VRusoro Mining Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GRZ.V or RML.V More Risky?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a beta of -0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 168.327% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rusoro Mining Ltd. has a beta of 0.802, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.774%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRZ.V or RML.V?
Gold Reserve Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rusoro Mining Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Reserve Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rusoro Mining Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRZ.V or RML.V?
Gold Reserve Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rusoro Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Gold Reserve Ltd.'s net income of -$12.8M is lower than Rusoro Mining Ltd.'s net income of $16.7M. Notably, Gold Reserve Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rusoro Mining Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Reserve Ltd. is -- versus 7.21x for Rusoro Mining Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRZ.VGold Reserve Ltd.-- -- -- -$12.8M RML.VRusoro Mining Ltd.7.21x -- -- $16.7M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
85
HUT alert for Dec 24
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Buy
63
GPCR alert for Dec 24
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.
Sell
32
SMX alert for Dec 24
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 8.94% over the past day.
