FDR.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Replenish Nutrients Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Founders Metals's net margin of 83.06%. Founders Metals's return on equity of -- beat Replenish Nutrients Holding's return on equity of -1.35%.

Founders Metals has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling downside risk potential of -3.85%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1025%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding has higher upside potential than Founders Metals, analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding is more attractive than Founders Metals.

Founders Metals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.857%.

Founders Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Founders Metals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Founders Metals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Founders Metals's net income of $11.4K is lower than Replenish Nutrients Holding's net income of $1.8M. Notably, Founders Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding's PE ratio is 67.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Founders Metals is -- versus 0.72x for Replenish Nutrients Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

K92 Mining has a net margin of -- compared to Founders Metals's net margin of 37.88%. Founders Metals's return on equity of -- beat K92 Mining's return on equity of 21.03%.

Founders Metals has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling downside risk potential of -3.85%. On the other hand K92 Mining has an analysts' consensus of $13.66 which suggests that it could grow by 59.57%. Given that K92 Mining has higher upside potential than Founders Metals, analysts believe K92 Mining is more attractive than Founders Metals.

Founders Metals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison K92 Mining has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.11%.

Founders Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. K92 Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Founders Metals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. K92 Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Founders Metals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than K92 Mining quarterly revenues of $167.5M. Founders Metals's net income of $11.4K is lower than K92 Mining's net income of $63.4M. Notably, Founders Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while K92 Mining's PE ratio is 20.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Founders Metals is -- versus 4.94x for K92 Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowline Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Founders Metals's net margin of --. Founders Metals's return on equity of -- beat Snowline Gold's return on equity of --.

Founders Metals has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling downside risk potential of -3.85%. On the other hand Snowline Gold has an analysts' consensus of $12.13 which suggests that it could grow by 125.37%. Given that Snowline Gold has higher upside potential than Founders Metals, analysts believe Snowline Gold is more attractive than Founders Metals.

Founders Metals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowline Gold has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Founders Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Snowline Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Founders Metals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snowline Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Founders Metals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Snowline Gold quarterly revenues of --. Founders Metals's net income of $11.4K is higher than Snowline Gold's net income of -$13.7M. Notably, Founders Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Snowline Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Founders Metals is -- versus 33,987.95x for Snowline Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

South Pacific Metals has a net margin of -- compared to Founders Metals's net margin of --. Founders Metals's return on equity of -- beat South Pacific Metals's return on equity of --.

Founders Metals has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling downside risk potential of -3.85%. On the other hand South Pacific Metals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Founders Metals has higher upside potential than South Pacific Metals, analysts believe Founders Metals is more attractive than South Pacific Metals.

Founders Metals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison South Pacific Metals has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.181%.

Founders Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. South Pacific Metals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Founders Metals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. South Pacific Metals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Founders Metals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than South Pacific Metals quarterly revenues of --. Founders Metals's net income of $11.4K is higher than South Pacific Metals's net income of -$259.2K. Notably, Founders Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while South Pacific Metals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Founders Metals is -- versus -- for South Pacific Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.