BSR.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a net margin of -- compared to Bluestone Resources's net margin of 25.53%. Bluestone Resources's return on equity of -- beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International's return on equity of -167.71%.

Bluestone Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 303.23%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bluestone Resources has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, analysts believe Bluestone Resources is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International.

Bluestone Resources has a beta of 1.871, which suggesting that the stock is 87.133% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bluestone Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bluestone Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bluestone Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Bluestone Resources's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net income of $20.9K. Notably, Bluestone Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bee Vectoring Technologies International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bluestone Resources is -- versus 1.37x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Bluestone Resources's net margin of 83.06%. Bluestone Resources's return on equity of -- beat Replenish Nutrients Holding's return on equity of -1.35%.

Bluestone Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 303.23%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1025%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding has higher upside potential than Bluestone Resources, analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding is more attractive than Bluestone Resources.

Bluestone Resources has a beta of 1.871, which suggesting that the stock is 87.133% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.857%.

Bluestone Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bluestone Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bluestone Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Bluestone Resources's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Replenish Nutrients Holding's net income of $1.8M. Notably, Bluestone Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding's PE ratio is 67.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bluestone Resources is -- versus 0.72x for Replenish Nutrients Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Organic Potash has a net margin of -- compared to Bluestone Resources's net margin of --. Bluestone Resources's return on equity of -- beat Organic Potash's return on equity of --.

Bluestone Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 303.23%. On the other hand Organic Potash has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bluestone Resources has higher upside potential than Organic Potash, analysts believe Bluestone Resources is more attractive than Organic Potash.

Bluestone Resources has a beta of 1.871, which suggesting that the stock is 87.133% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.116%.

Bluestone Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bluestone Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bluestone Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Organic Potash quarterly revenues of --. Bluestone Resources's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Organic Potash's net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Bluestone Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Organic Potash's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bluestone Resources is -- versus -- for Organic Potash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Aura Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Bluestone Resources's net margin of -7.64%. Bluestone Resources's return on equity of -- beat Aura Minerals's return on equity of -18.55%.

Bluestone Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 303.23%. On the other hand Aura Minerals has an analysts' consensus of $14.66 which suggests that it could fall by -14.11%. Given that Bluestone Resources has higher upside potential than Aura Minerals, analysts believe Bluestone Resources is more attractive than Aura Minerals.

Bluestone Resources has a beta of 1.871, which suggesting that the stock is 87.133% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aura Minerals has a beta of 0.500, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.045%.

Bluestone Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aura Minerals offers a yield of 6.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Bluestone Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aura Minerals pays out 88.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Aura Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bluestone Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Aura Minerals quarterly revenues of $213.1M. Bluestone Resources's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Aura Minerals's net income of -$16.3M. Notably, Bluestone Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aura Minerals's PE ratio is 132.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bluestone Resources is -- versus 1.66x for Aura Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.