Is Shopify Stock a Good Buy Now?
eCommerce technology platform Shopify (NASDAQ:SHOP) delivered impressive returns in 2025…
Buy
79
BMR.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.16
Seasonality move
:
20.61%
Day range:
$0.15 - $0.16
52-week range:
$0.07 - $0.18
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.48x
P/B ratio:
0.35x
Volume:
27.6K
Avg. volume:
27K
1-year change:
100%
Market cap:
$29.5M
Revenue:
$32.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.28
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BMR.V
Battery Mineral Resources Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NTH.V
Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BMR.V
Battery Mineral Resources Corp.
|
$0.16 | -- | $29.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.48x |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
$0.64 | -- | $14.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.35x |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
$0.13 | -- | $20.9M | 151.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.05x |
|
NTH.V
Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc.
|
$0.30 | -- | $22.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $605.6K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BMR.V
Battery Mineral Resources Corp.
|
107.43% | 7.182 | 210.68% | 0.08x |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | 9.716 | -- | 5.08x |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
21.47% | 0.000 | 5.8% | 0.39x |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
41.88% | 2.524 | 33.1% | 0.25x |
|
NTH.V
Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc.
|
-- | 5.418 | -- | 0.24x |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BMR.V
Battery Mineral Resources Corp.
|
$5.1M | $2.1M | -86.96% | -1152.32% | 13.94% | $4.7M |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -$1.2M | -1103.05% | -1103.05% | -- | -$630.9K |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
$50K | -$390.8K | -138.99% | -167.71% | 88.71% | $38.2K |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
-$558.4K | -$1.2M | -45.73% | -65.23% | -60.25% | -$630.3K |
|
NTH.V
Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc.
|
-$37.4K | -$1.1M | -- | -- | -- | -$931.8K |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | -$16.2K | -- | -- | -- | -$43.6K |
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BMR.V or ARGO.CX?
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has a net margin of 1.86% compared to Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s net margin of --. Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -1152.32% beat Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of -1103.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.33.95% $0.00 $48M ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.-- -$0.06 $468.6K -
What do Analysts Say About BMR.V or ARGO.CX?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp., analysts believe Battery Mineral Resources Corp. is more attractive than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.0 0 0 ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.0 0 0 -
Is BMR.V or ARGO.CX More Risky?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a beta of 2.910, which suggesting that the stock is 190.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BMR.V or ARGO.CX?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Battery Mineral Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BMR.V or ARGO.CX?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are $15.1M, which are larger than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s net income of $280.9K is higher than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Battery Mineral Resources Corp. is 0.48x versus -- for Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.0.48x -- $15.1M $280.9K ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.-- -- -- -$1.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns BMR.V or BEE.CX?
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of 1.86% compared to Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s net margin of 25.53%. Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -1152.32% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.33.95% $0.00 $48M BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.61.05% $0.00 $1.4M -
What do Analysts Say About BMR.V or BEE.CX?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe Battery Mineral Resources Corp. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.0 0 0 BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is BMR.V or BEE.CX More Risky?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a beta of 2.910, which suggesting that the stock is 190.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.155%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BMR.V or BEE.CX?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Battery Mineral Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BMR.V or BEE.CX?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are $15.1M, which are larger than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s net income of $280.9K is higher than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Battery Mineral Resources Corp. is 0.48x versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.0.48x -- $15.1M $280.9K BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.2.35x -- $81.9K $20.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns BMR.V or ERTH.CX?
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of 1.86% compared to Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s net margin of -74.66%. Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -1152.32% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.33.95% $0.00 $48M ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.-28.19% -$0.01 $15.2M -
What do Analysts Say About BMR.V or ERTH.CX?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 246.15%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Battery Mineral Resources Corp., analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. is more attractive than Battery Mineral Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.0 0 0 ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.0 0 0 -
Is BMR.V or ERTH.CX More Risky?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a beta of 2.910, which suggesting that the stock is 190.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.342%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BMR.V or ERTH.CX?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Battery Mineral Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BMR.V or ERTH.CX?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are $15.1M, which are larger than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s net income of $280.9K is higher than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Battery Mineral Resources Corp. is 0.48x versus 3.05x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.0.48x -- $15.1M $280.9K ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.3.05x 151.77x $2M -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns BMR.V or NTH.V?
Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc. has a net margin of 1.86% compared to Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s net margin of --. Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -1152.32% beat Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.33.95% $0.00 $48M NTH.VNord Precious Metals Mining, Inc.-- -$0.02 -$2.2M -
What do Analysts Say About BMR.V or NTH.V?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc., analysts believe Battery Mineral Resources Corp. is more attractive than Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.0 0 0 NTH.VNord Precious Metals Mining, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is BMR.V or NTH.V More Risky?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a beta of 2.910, which suggesting that the stock is 190.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc. has a beta of 1.258, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.791%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BMR.V or NTH.V?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Battery Mineral Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BMR.V or NTH.V?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are $15.1M, which are larger than Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s net income of $280.9K is higher than Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc.'s net income of -$761.8K. Notably, Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Battery Mineral Resources Corp. is 0.48x versus -- for Nord Precious Metals Mining, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.0.48x -- $15.1M $280.9K NTH.VNord Precious Metals Mining, Inc.-- -- -- -$761.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns BMR.V or OPC.CX?
Organic Potash Corp. has a net margin of 1.86% compared to Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s net margin of --. Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -1152.32% beat Organic Potash Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.33.95% $0.00 $48M OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.-- -$0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About BMR.V or OPC.CX?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Organic Potash Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Organic Potash Corp., analysts believe Battery Mineral Resources Corp. is more attractive than Organic Potash Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.0 0 0 OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.0 0 0 -
Is BMR.V or OPC.CX More Risky?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a beta of 2.910, which suggesting that the stock is 190.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash Corp. has a beta of -0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 166.29%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BMR.V or OPC.CX?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Battery Mineral Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BMR.V or OPC.CX?
Battery Mineral Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are $15.1M, which are larger than Organic Potash Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s net income of $280.9K is higher than Organic Potash Corp.'s net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Battery Mineral Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Organic Potash Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Battery Mineral Resources Corp. is 0.48x versus -- for Organic Potash Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BMR.VBattery Mineral Resources Corp.0.48x -- $15.1M $280.9K OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.-- -- -- -$23.7K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?
2025 was another banner year for the Magnificent Seven stocks,…
Why Did Planet Labs Stock Rally So Much?
Satellite imaging startup Planet Labs (NYSE:PL), after years of disappointing…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
100
ATGL alert for Jan 10
Alpha Technology Group Ltd. [ATGL] is up 47.05% over the past day.
Buy
71
NAIL alert for Jan 10
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 18.52% over the past day.
Buy
54
LGIH alert for Jan 10
LGI Homes, Inc. [LGIH] is up 13.81% over the past day.
