Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Sell
16
ACU.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.02
Seasonality move
:
2.71%
Day range:
$0.02 - $0.03
52-week range:
$0.02 - $0.06
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
185.87x
P/S ratio:
0.43x
P/B ratio:
0.81x
Volume:
64.2K
Avg. volume:
145.1K
1-year change:
-20%
Market cap:
$4.4M
Revenue:
$10.9M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACU.V
Aurora Solar Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CISC.CX
Ciscom
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NERD.CX
Nerds On Site
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NEWS.CX
New World Solutions
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PAID.CX
XTM
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WIN.CX
Windfall Geotek
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACU.V
Aurora Solar Technologies
|
$0.02 | -- | $4.4M | 185.87x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.43x |
|
CISC.CX
Ciscom
|
$0.06 | -- | $3.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.08x |
|
NERD.CX
Nerds On Site
|
$0.07 | -- | $6.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.56x |
|
NEWS.CX
New World Solutions
|
$0.03 | -- | $3.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PAID.CX
XTM
|
$0.07 | -- | $13.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.71x |
|
WIN.CX
Windfall Geotek
|
$0.0100 | -- | $1.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.83x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACU.V
Aurora Solar Technologies
|
0.65% | 0.977 | 0.46% | 0.54x |
|
CISC.CX
Ciscom
|
46.69% | 1.360 | 107.94% | 0.50x |
|
NERD.CX
Nerds On Site
|
-13.47% | 0.049 | 4.88% | 0.62x |
|
NEWS.CX
New World Solutions
|
24.47% | 7.830 | 17.38% | 0.36x |
|
PAID.CX
XTM
|
-163.05% | -0.712 | 57.04% | 0.06x |
|
WIN.CX
Windfall Geotek
|
-- | 1.445 | -- | 10.42x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACU.V
Aurora Solar Technologies
|
$1.2M | -$424K | -12.24% | -12.34% | -22.53% | -$778.6K |
|
CISC.CX
Ciscom
|
$1.6M | -$37.3K | -6.42% | -12.55% | -0.43% | $465K |
|
NERD.CX
Nerds On Site
|
$698.6K | -$34.9K | -- | -- | 0.02% | -$92K |
|
NEWS.CX
New World Solutions
|
$6.2K | -$403.6K | -131.09% | -143.2% | -6062.21% | -$89.4K |
|
PAID.CX
XTM
|
$161.4K | -$4.1M | -- | -- | -161.04% | $209.8K |
|
WIN.CX
Windfall Geotek
|
$100K | -$108.2K | -96.84% | -96.84% | -108.2% | -$241.9K |
Aurora Solar Technologies vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ACU.V or CISC.CX?
Ciscom has a net margin of -19.42% compared to Aurora Solar Technologies's net margin of -1.75%. Aurora Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12.34% beat Ciscom's return on equity of -12.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies56.49% -$0.00 $5.5M CISC.CXCiscom18.06% -$0.00 $10.5M -
What do Analysts Say About ACU.V or CISC.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ciscom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aurora Solar Technologies has higher upside potential than Ciscom, analysts believe Aurora Solar Technologies is more attractive than Ciscom.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies0 0 0 CISC.CXCiscom0 0 0 -
Is ACU.V or CISC.CX More Risky?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a beta of 1.680, which suggesting that the stock is 68.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ciscom has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACU.V or CISC.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ciscom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Solar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ciscom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACU.V or CISC.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are smaller than Ciscom quarterly revenues of $8.6M. Aurora Solar Technologies's net income of -$422.5K is lower than Ciscom's net income of -$151K. Notably, Aurora Solar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 185.87x while Ciscom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Solar Technologies is 0.43x versus 0.08x for Ciscom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies0.43x 185.87x $2.2M -$422.5K CISC.CXCiscom0.08x -- $8.6M -$151K
-
Which has Higher Returns ACU.V or NERD.CX?
Nerds On Site has a net margin of -19.42% compared to Aurora Solar Technologies's net margin of -1.47%. Aurora Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12.34% beat Nerds On Site's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies56.49% -$0.00 $5.5M NERD.CXNerds On Site23.71% -$0.00 -$1.3M -
What do Analysts Say About ACU.V or NERD.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nerds On Site has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aurora Solar Technologies has higher upside potential than Nerds On Site, analysts believe Aurora Solar Technologies is more attractive than Nerds On Site.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies0 0 0 NERD.CXNerds On Site0 0 0 -
Is ACU.V or NERD.CX More Risky?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a beta of 1.680, which suggesting that the stock is 68.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nerds On Site has a beta of 1.950, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.038%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACU.V or NERD.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nerds On Site offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Solar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nerds On Site pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACU.V or NERD.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are smaller than Nerds On Site quarterly revenues of $2.9M. Aurora Solar Technologies's net income of -$422.5K is lower than Nerds On Site's net income of -$43.2K. Notably, Aurora Solar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 185.87x while Nerds On Site's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Solar Technologies is 0.43x versus 0.56x for Nerds On Site. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies0.43x 185.87x $2.2M -$422.5K NERD.CXNerds On Site0.56x -- $2.9M -$43.2K
-
Which has Higher Returns ACU.V or NEWS.CX?
New World Solutions has a net margin of -19.42% compared to Aurora Solar Technologies's net margin of -6221.4%. Aurora Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12.34% beat New World Solutions's return on equity of -143.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies56.49% -$0.00 $5.5M NEWS.CXNew World Solutions-- -$0.00 $1.3M -
What do Analysts Say About ACU.V or NEWS.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New World Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aurora Solar Technologies has higher upside potential than New World Solutions, analysts believe Aurora Solar Technologies is more attractive than New World Solutions.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies0 0 0 NEWS.CXNew World Solutions0 0 0 -
Is ACU.V or NEWS.CX More Risky?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a beta of 1.680, which suggesting that the stock is 68.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New World Solutions has a beta of 3.284, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 228.367%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACU.V or NEWS.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New World Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Solar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New World Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACU.V or NEWS.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are larger than New World Solutions quarterly revenues of $6.2K. Aurora Solar Technologies's net income of -$422.5K is lower than New World Solutions's net income of -$382.9K. Notably, Aurora Solar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 185.87x while New World Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Solar Technologies is 0.43x versus -- for New World Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies0.43x 185.87x $2.2M -$422.5K NEWS.CXNew World Solutions-- -- $6.2K -$382.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns ACU.V or PAID.CX?
XTM has a net margin of -19.42% compared to Aurora Solar Technologies's net margin of -172.45%. Aurora Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12.34% beat XTM's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies56.49% -$0.00 $5.5M PAID.CXXTM6.69% -$0.02 -$8.1M -
What do Analysts Say About ACU.V or PAID.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand XTM has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aurora Solar Technologies has higher upside potential than XTM, analysts believe Aurora Solar Technologies is more attractive than XTM.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies0 0 0 PAID.CXXTM0 0 0 -
Is ACU.V or PAID.CX More Risky?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a beta of 1.680, which suggesting that the stock is 68.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XTM has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACU.V or PAID.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XTM offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Solar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XTM pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACU.V or PAID.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are smaller than XTM quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Aurora Solar Technologies's net income of -$422.5K is higher than XTM's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Aurora Solar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 185.87x while XTM's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Solar Technologies is 0.43x versus 1.71x for XTM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies0.43x 185.87x $2.2M -$422.5K PAID.CXXTM1.71x -- $2.4M -$4.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns ACU.V or WIN.CX?
Windfall Geotek has a net margin of -19.42% compared to Aurora Solar Technologies's net margin of -50.02%. Aurora Solar Technologies's return on equity of -12.34% beat Windfall Geotek's return on equity of -96.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies56.49% -$0.00 $5.5M WIN.CXWindfall Geotek78.3% -$0.00 $881.5K -
What do Analysts Say About ACU.V or WIN.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Windfall Geotek has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aurora Solar Technologies has higher upside potential than Windfall Geotek, analysts believe Aurora Solar Technologies is more attractive than Windfall Geotek.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies0 0 0 WIN.CXWindfall Geotek0 0 0 -
Is ACU.V or WIN.CX More Risky?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a beta of 1.680, which suggesting that the stock is 68.001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Windfall Geotek has a beta of 1.830, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.997%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACU.V or WIN.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Windfall Geotek offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Solar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Windfall Geotek pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACU.V or WIN.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are larger than Windfall Geotek quarterly revenues of $100K. Aurora Solar Technologies's net income of -$422.5K is lower than Windfall Geotek's net income of -$50K. Notably, Aurora Solar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 185.87x while Windfall Geotek's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Solar Technologies is 0.43x versus 5.83x for Windfall Geotek. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies0.43x 185.87x $2.2M -$422.5K WIN.CXWindfall Geotek5.83x -- $100K -$50K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Sell
40
MSTR alert for Dec 24
MicroStrategy [MSTR] is up 6.85% over the past day.
Sell
26
NUTX alert for Dec 24
Nutex Health [NUTX] is up 0.85% over the past day.
Sell
48
VRNA alert for Dec 24
Verona Pharma PLC [VRNA] is down 0.55% over the past day.
