Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
20
ACU.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.0100
Seasonality move
:
12.92%
Day range:
$0.0100 - $0.0100
52-week range:
$0.0050 - $0.0300
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
167.29x
P/S ratio:
0.59x
P/B ratio:
1.05x
Volume:
93
Avg. volume:
384.6K
1-year change:
-50%
Market cap:
$2.2M
Revenue:
$6.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACU.V
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CISC.CX
Ciscom Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NERD.CX
Nerds On Site, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NEWS.CX
New World Solutions, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PAID.CX
XTM, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WIN.CX
Windfall Geotek, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACU.V
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.
|
$0.0100 | -- | $2.2M | 167.29x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.59x |
|
CISC.CX
Ciscom Corp.
|
$0.01 | -- | $595.2K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.02x |
|
NERD.CX
Nerds On Site, Inc.
|
$0.05 | -- | $4.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.35x |
|
NEWS.CX
New World Solutions, Inc.
|
$0.03 | -- | $4.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 85.53x |
|
PAID.CX
XTM, Inc.
|
$0.02 | -- | $4.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.34x |
|
WIN.CX
Windfall Geotek, Inc.
|
$0.0450 | -- | $6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 28.07x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACU.V
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.
|
19.75% | 3.437 | 23.34% | 0.25x |
|
CISC.CX
Ciscom Corp.
|
42.15% | 4.032 | 180.48% | 0.64x |
|
NERD.CX
Nerds On Site, Inc.
|
-297.56% | -2.712 | 79.16% | 0.41x |
|
NEWS.CX
New World Solutions, Inc.
|
31.23% | 0.000 | 6.98% | 0.30x |
|
PAID.CX
XTM, Inc.
|
-38.82% | 1.727 | 158.11% | 0.57x |
|
WIN.CX
Windfall Geotek, Inc.
|
-- | 0.390 | -- | 0.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACU.V
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.
|
$551.8K | -$479.6K | -91.77% | -105.62% | -48.37% | $955.7K |
|
CISC.CX
Ciscom Corp.
|
$664K | -$224.5K | -19.8% | -35.26% | -4.3% | $680.4K |
|
NERD.CX
Nerds On Site, Inc.
|
$755.4K | -$89.8K | -- | -- | -2.81% | -$131.6K |
|
NEWS.CX
New World Solutions, Inc.
|
$8.4K | -$340.5K | -248.85% | -288.89% | -21746.99% | -$32.8K |
|
PAID.CX
XTM, Inc.
|
-$2.1M | -$3M | -- | -- | -124.13% | -$7.2M |
|
WIN.CX
Windfall Geotek, Inc.
|
-- | -$148.7K | -708.33% | -708.33% | -743.5% | -$146.1K |
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ACU.V or CISC.CX?
Ciscom Corp. has a net margin of -33.46% compared to Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -3.6%. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.62% beat Ciscom Corp.'s return on equity of -35.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.55.65% -$0.00 $2.6M CISC.CXCiscom Corp.12.72% -$0.00 $7.6M -
What do Analysts Say About ACU.V or CISC.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ciscom Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ciscom Corp., analysts believe Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Ciscom Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.0 0 0 CISC.CXCiscom Corp.0 0 0 -
Is ACU.V or CISC.CX More Risky?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.615, which suggesting that the stock is 61.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ciscom Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACU.V or CISC.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ciscom Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ciscom Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACU.V or CISC.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $991.6K, which are smaller than Ciscom Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.2M. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$331.8K is lower than Ciscom Corp.'s net income of -$187.9K. Notably, Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 167.29x while Ciscom Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. is 0.59x versus 0.02x for Ciscom Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.0.59x 167.29x $991.6K -$331.8K CISC.CXCiscom Corp.0.02x -- $5.2M -$187.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns ACU.V or NERD.CX?
Nerds On Site, Inc. has a net margin of -33.46% compared to Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -6.67%. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.62% beat Nerds On Site, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.55.65% -$0.00 $2.6M NERD.CXNerds On Site, Inc.23.62% -$0.00 -$664.5K -
What do Analysts Say About ACU.V or NERD.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nerds On Site, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nerds On Site, Inc., analysts believe Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Nerds On Site, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.0 0 0 NERD.CXNerds On Site, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ACU.V or NERD.CX More Risky?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.615, which suggesting that the stock is 61.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nerds On Site, Inc. has a beta of 2.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.427%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACU.V or NERD.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nerds On Site, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nerds On Site, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACU.V or NERD.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $991.6K, which are smaller than Nerds On Site, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$331.8K is lower than Nerds On Site, Inc.'s net income of -$213.4K. Notably, Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 167.29x while Nerds On Site, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. is 0.59x versus 0.35x for Nerds On Site, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.0.59x 167.29x $991.6K -$331.8K NERD.CXNerds On Site, Inc.0.35x -- $3.2M -$213.4K
-
Which has Higher Returns ACU.V or NEWS.CX?
New World Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of -33.46% compared to Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -21844.44%. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.62% beat New World Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of -288.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.55.65% -$0.00 $2.6M NEWS.CXNew World Solutions, Inc.-- -$0.01 $941.3K -
What do Analysts Say About ACU.V or NEWS.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New World Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than New World Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than New World Solutions, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.0 0 0 NEWS.CXNew World Solutions, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ACU.V or NEWS.CX More Risky?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.615, which suggesting that the stock is 61.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New World Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 3.969, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 296.868%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACU.V or NEWS.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New World Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New World Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACU.V or NEWS.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $991.6K, which are larger than New World Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.4K. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$331.8K is higher than New World Solutions, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 167.29x while New World Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. is 0.59x versus 85.53x for New World Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.0.59x 167.29x $991.6K -$331.8K NEWS.CXNew World Solutions, Inc.85.53x -- $8.4K -$1.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns ACU.V or PAID.CX?
XTM, Inc. has a net margin of -33.46% compared to Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -207.35%. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.62% beat XTM, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.55.65% -$0.00 $2.6M PAID.CXXTM, Inc.-86.57% -$0.02 -$28.8M -
What do Analysts Say About ACU.V or PAID.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand XTM, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than XTM, Inc., analysts believe Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than XTM, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.0 0 0 PAID.CXXTM, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ACU.V or PAID.CX More Risky?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.615, which suggesting that the stock is 61.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XTM, Inc. has a beta of 1.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.071%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACU.V or PAID.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XTM, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XTM, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACU.V or PAID.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $991.6K, which are smaller than XTM, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$331.8K is higher than XTM, Inc.'s net income of -$5M. Notably, Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 167.29x while XTM, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. is 0.59x versus 0.34x for XTM, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.0.59x 167.29x $991.6K -$331.8K PAID.CXXTM, Inc.0.34x -- $2.4M -$5M
-
Which has Higher Returns ACU.V or WIN.CX?
Windfall Geotek, Inc. has a net margin of -33.46% compared to Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -534.5%. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.62% beat Windfall Geotek, Inc.'s return on equity of -708.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.55.65% -$0.00 $2.6M WIN.CXWindfall Geotek, Inc.-- -$0.00 -$175.5K -
What do Analysts Say About ACU.V or WIN.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Windfall Geotek, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Windfall Geotek, Inc., analysts believe Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Windfall Geotek, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.0 0 0 WIN.CXWindfall Geotek, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ACU.V or WIN.CX More Risky?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.615, which suggesting that the stock is 61.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Windfall Geotek, Inc. has a beta of 1.905, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.476%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACU.V or WIN.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Windfall Geotek, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Windfall Geotek, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACU.V or WIN.CX?
Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $991.6K, which are larger than Windfall Geotek, Inc. quarterly revenues of $20K. Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$331.8K is lower than Windfall Geotek, Inc.'s net income of -$106.9K. Notably, Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 167.29x while Windfall Geotek, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Solar Technologies, Inc. is 0.59x versus 28.07x for Windfall Geotek, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACU.VAurora Solar Technologies, Inc.0.59x 167.29x $991.6K -$331.8K WIN.CXWindfall Geotek, Inc.28.07x -- $20K -$106.9K
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Buy
78
TVTX alert for Dec 27
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is down 1.54% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
