ABM.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Aben Gold Corp.'s net margin of 25.53%. Aben Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -4.31% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.

Aben Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aben Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe Aben Gold Corp. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..

Aben Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.438% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.573%.

Aben Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aben Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aben Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Aben Gold Corp.'s net income of -$130.3K is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, Aben Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aben Gold Corp. is -- versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Aben Gold Corp.'s net margin of -74.66%. Aben Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -4.31% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.

Aben Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 260%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Aben Gold Corp., analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. is more attractive than Aben Gold Corp..

Aben Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.438% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.18%.

Aben Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aben Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aben Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. Aben Gold Corp.'s net income of -$130.3K is higher than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Aben Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aben Gold Corp. is -- versus 2.93x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingfisher Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Aben Gold Corp.'s net margin of --. Aben Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -4.31% beat Kingfisher Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -3.52%.

Aben Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kingfisher Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aben Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Kingfisher Metals Corp., analysts believe Aben Gold Corp. is more attractive than Kingfisher Metals Corp..

Aben Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.438% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingfisher Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.584, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.563%.

Aben Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingfisher Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aben Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingfisher Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aben Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kingfisher Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Aben Gold Corp.'s net income of -$130.3K is lower than Kingfisher Metals Corp.'s net income of $302K. Notably, Aben Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kingfisher Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aben Gold Corp. is -- versus -- for Kingfisher Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Organic Potash Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Aben Gold Corp.'s net margin of --. Aben Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -4.31% beat Organic Potash Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Aben Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Organic Potash Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aben Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Organic Potash Corp., analysts believe Aben Gold Corp. is more attractive than Organic Potash Corp..

Aben Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.438% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash Corp. has a beta of -0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 166.856%.

Aben Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aben Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aben Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Organic Potash Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Aben Gold Corp.'s net income of -$130.3K is lower than Organic Potash Corp.'s net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Aben Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Organic Potash Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aben Gold Corp. is -- versus -- for Organic Potash Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.