Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Buy
55
ZLSC.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$43.43
Seasonality move
:
0.59%
Day range:
$43.43 - $43.48
52-week range:
$34.45 - $43.56
Dividend yield:
1.62%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
330
Avg. volume:
2.3K
1-year change:
14.19%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZLSC.TO
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PFAE.TO
Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PFLS.TO
Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHE.B.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZLSU.TO
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZLSC.TO
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF
|
$43.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 1.62% | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
$17.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 11.04% | -- |
|
PFAE.TO
Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF
|
$25.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 0.02% | -- |
|
PFLS.TO
Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF
|
$20.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 0% | -- |
|
PHE.B.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH
|
$45.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.67 | 1.48% | -- |
|
ZLSU.TO
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF
|
$44.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.03% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZLSC.TO
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.480 | -- | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
-- | 1.292 | -- | -- |
|
PFAE.TO
Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF
|
-- | 1.031 | -- | -- |
|
PFLS.TO
Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF
|
-- | 0.606 | -- | -- |
|
PHE.B.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH
|
-- | 0.628 | -- | -- |
|
ZLSU.TO
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.425 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZLSC.TO
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PFAE.TO
Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PFLS.TO
Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHE.B.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZLSU.TO
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ZLSC.TO or HTAE.TO?
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's net margin of --. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- HTAE.TOHarvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZLSC.TO or HTAE.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF, analysts believe BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF is more attractive than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF0 0 0 HTAE.TOHarvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is ZLSC.TO or HTAE.TO More Risky?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZLSC.TO or HTAE.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF offers a yield of 11.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZLSC.TO or HTAE.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- -- HTAE.TOHarvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZLSC.TO or PFAE.TO?
Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's net margin of --. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- PFAE.TOPicton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZLSC.TO or PFAE.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF, analysts believe BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF is more attractive than Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF0 0 0 PFAE.TOPicton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF0 0 0 -
Is ZLSC.TO or PFAE.TO More Risky?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.68%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZLSC.TO or PFAE.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZLSC.TO or PFAE.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF quarterly revenues of --. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF's net income of --. Notably, BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Picton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- -- PFAE.TOPicton Long Short Equity (130/30) Alt Fund Cl ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZLSC.TO or PFLS.TO?
Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's net margin of --. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- PFLS.TOPicton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZLSC.TO or PFLS.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF, analysts believe BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF is more attractive than Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF0 0 0 PFLS.TOPicton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF0 0 0 -
Is ZLSC.TO or PFLS.TO More Risky?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF has a beta of 0.505, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.463%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZLSC.TO or PFLS.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZLSC.TO or PFLS.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF quarterly revenues of --. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF's net income of --. Notably, BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Picton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- -- PFLS.TOPicton Long Short Equity Alt Fund Cl ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZLSC.TO or PHE.B.TO?
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's net margin of --. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- PHE.B.TOPurpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZLSC.TO or PHE.B.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH, analysts believe BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF is more attractive than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF0 0 0 PHE.B.TOPurpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH0 0 0 -
Is ZLSC.TO or PHE.B.TO More Risky?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH has a beta of 0.371, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.854%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZLSC.TO or PHE.B.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZLSC.TO or PHE.B.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH quarterly revenues of --. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH's net income of --. Notably, BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- -- PHE.B.TOPurpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZLSC.TO or ZLSU.TO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's net margin of --. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZLSC.TO or ZLSU.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Long Short US Equity ETF, analysts believe BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF is more attractive than BMO Long Short US Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF0 0 0 ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is ZLSC.TO or ZLSU.TO More Risky?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZLSC.TO or ZLSU.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZLSC.TO or ZLSU.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Long Short US Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Long Short US Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- -- ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
69
NUTX alert for Dec 6
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 2.97% over the past day.
Sell
1
SYM alert for Dec 6
Symbotic, Inc. [SYM] is down 1.32% over the past day.
