Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
40
TRZ.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.63
Seasonality move
:
5.11%
Day range:
$2.55 - $2.63
52-week range:
$1.41 - $3.25
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
0.48x
P/S ratio:
0.03x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
85K
Avg. volume:
117.9K
1-year change:
43.72%
Market cap:
$106.7M
Revenue:
$3.4B
EPS (TTM):
$5.45
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRZ.TO
Transat A.T., Inc.
|
$854.4M | -$1.34 | 3.44% | -62.42% | $3.23 |
|
ATHR.CX
Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCR.CX
Green River Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JIVA.CX
JIVA Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NEXE.V
NEXE Innovations, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WPK.TO
Winpak Ltd.
|
$423.1M | $0.86 | 1.26% | 4.4% | $48.22 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRZ.TO
Transat A.T., Inc.
|
$2.63 | $3.23 | $106.7M | 0.48x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
ATHR.CX
Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.
|
$0.06 | -- | $4.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CCR.CX
Green River Gold Corp.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $684.4K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 22.25x |
|
JIVA.CX
JIVA Technologies, Inc.
|
$0.02 | -- | $104.8K | 0.50x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
|
NEXE.V
NEXE Innovations, Inc.
|
$0.14 | -- | $13.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 32.06x |
|
WPK.TO
Winpak Ltd.
|
$44.85 | $48.22 | $2.7B | 14.35x | $0.05 | 0.45% | 1.76x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRZ.TO
Transat A.T., Inc.
|
170.8% | 1.178 | 1826.43% | 0.43x |
|
ATHR.CX
Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.
|
339.18% | -2.753 | 7.73% | 0.22x |
|
CCR.CX
Green River Gold Corp.
|
9.79% | 0.591 | 5.74% | 0.42x |
|
JIVA.CX
JIVA Technologies, Inc.
|
-99.31% | 3.442 | 2177.41% | 0.02x |
|
NEXE.V
NEXE Innovations, Inc.
|
-- | 1.177 | -- | 3.67x |
|
WPK.TO
Winpak Ltd.
|
-- | 0.258 | -- | 5.11x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRZ.TO
Transat A.T., Inc.
|
$88.6M | $1.7M | 22.75% | -- | 0.22% | -$144.4M |
|
ATHR.CX
Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.
|
-$9.2K | -$407.1K | -1167.62% | -- | -- | -$171.2K |
|
CCR.CX
Green River Gold Corp.
|
-- | -$121.1K | -27.26% | -30.22% | -1719.46% | -$113.6K |
|
JIVA.CX
JIVA Technologies, Inc.
|
$259.1K | -$75.8K | -- | -- | -5.86% | $126.8K |
|
NEXE.V
NEXE Innovations, Inc.
|
-$432.7K | -$1.5M | -19.95% | -19.95% | -1237.01% | -$858K |
|
WPK.TO
Winpak Ltd.
|
$118.8M | $65.2M | 10.32% | 10.35% | 16.73% | $54.1M |
Transat A.T., Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TRZ.TO or ATHR.CX?
Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of -1.62% compared to Transat A.T., Inc.'s net margin of --. Transat A.T., Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.11.49% -$0.31 $911.1M ATHR.CXAether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.-- -$0.01 $128.9K -
What do Analysts Say About TRZ.TO or ATHR.CX?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.23, signalling upside risk potential of 22.81%. On the other hand Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transat A.T., Inc. has higher upside potential than Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Transat A.T., Inc. is more attractive than Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.1 2 1 ATHR.CXAether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is TRZ.TO or ATHR.CX More Risky?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.022%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRZ.TO or ATHR.CX?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transat A.T., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRZ.TO or ATHR.CX?
Transat A.T., Inc. quarterly revenues are $771.6M, which are larger than Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Transat A.T., Inc.'s net income of -$12.5M is lower than Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.'s net income of -$413.5K. Notably, Transat A.T., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.48x while Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transat A.T., Inc. is 0.03x versus -- for Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.0.03x 0.48x $771.6M -$12.5M ATHR.CXAether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.-- -- -- -$413.5K
-
Which has Higher Returns TRZ.TO or CCR.CX?
Green River Gold Corp. has a net margin of -1.62% compared to Transat A.T., Inc.'s net margin of -1812.76%. Transat A.T., Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Green River Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -30.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.11.49% -$0.31 $911.1M CCR.CXGreen River Gold Corp.-- -$0.00 $3M -
What do Analysts Say About TRZ.TO or CCR.CX?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.23, signalling upside risk potential of 22.81%. On the other hand Green River Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transat A.T., Inc. has higher upside potential than Green River Gold Corp., analysts believe Transat A.T., Inc. is more attractive than Green River Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.1 2 1 CCR.CXGreen River Gold Corp.0 0 0 -
Is TRZ.TO or CCR.CX More Risky?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green River Gold Corp. has a beta of -1.231, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 223.099%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRZ.TO or CCR.CX?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Green River Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transat A.T., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Green River Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRZ.TO or CCR.CX?
Transat A.T., Inc. quarterly revenues are $771.6M, which are larger than Green River Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $10K. Transat A.T., Inc.'s net income of -$12.5M is lower than Green River Gold Corp.'s net income of -$129K. Notably, Transat A.T., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.48x while Green River Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transat A.T., Inc. is 0.03x versus 22.25x for Green River Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.0.03x 0.48x $771.6M -$12.5M CCR.CXGreen River Gold Corp.22.25x -- $10K -$129K
-
Which has Higher Returns TRZ.TO or JIVA.CX?
JIVA Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -1.62% compared to Transat A.T., Inc.'s net margin of -20.27%. Transat A.T., Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat JIVA Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.11.49% -$0.31 $911.1M JIVA.CXJIVA Technologies, Inc.20.01% -$0.06 -$6.3M -
What do Analysts Say About TRZ.TO or JIVA.CX?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.23, signalling upside risk potential of 22.81%. On the other hand JIVA Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transat A.T., Inc. has higher upside potential than JIVA Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Transat A.T., Inc. is more attractive than JIVA Technologies, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.1 2 1 JIVA.CXJIVA Technologies, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is TRZ.TO or JIVA.CX More Risky?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JIVA Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.82%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRZ.TO or JIVA.CX?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JIVA Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transat A.T., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JIVA Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRZ.TO or JIVA.CX?
Transat A.T., Inc. quarterly revenues are $771.6M, which are larger than JIVA Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3M. Transat A.T., Inc.'s net income of -$12.5M is lower than JIVA Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$262.4K. Notably, Transat A.T., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.48x while JIVA Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transat A.T., Inc. is 0.03x versus 0.01x for JIVA Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.0.03x 0.48x $771.6M -$12.5M JIVA.CXJIVA Technologies, Inc.0.01x 0.50x $1.3M -$262.4K
-
Which has Higher Returns TRZ.TO or NEXE.V?
NEXE Innovations, Inc. has a net margin of -1.62% compared to Transat A.T., Inc.'s net margin of -1184.9%. Transat A.T., Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat NEXE Innovations, Inc.'s return on equity of -19.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.11.49% -$0.31 $911.1M NEXE.VNEXE Innovations, Inc.-359.09% -$0.01 $30.1M -
What do Analysts Say About TRZ.TO or NEXE.V?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.23, signalling upside risk potential of 22.81%. On the other hand NEXE Innovations, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 614.29%. Given that NEXE Innovations, Inc. has higher upside potential than Transat A.T., Inc., analysts believe NEXE Innovations, Inc. is more attractive than Transat A.T., Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.1 2 1 NEXE.VNEXE Innovations, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is TRZ.TO or NEXE.V More Risky?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NEXE Innovations, Inc. has a beta of 1.807, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.724%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRZ.TO or NEXE.V?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NEXE Innovations, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transat A.T., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NEXE Innovations, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRZ.TO or NEXE.V?
Transat A.T., Inc. quarterly revenues are $771.6M, which are larger than NEXE Innovations, Inc. quarterly revenues of $120.5K. Transat A.T., Inc.'s net income of -$12.5M is lower than NEXE Innovations, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Transat A.T., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.48x while NEXE Innovations, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transat A.T., Inc. is 0.03x versus 32.06x for NEXE Innovations, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.0.03x 0.48x $771.6M -$12.5M NEXE.VNEXE Innovations, Inc.32.06x -- $120.5K -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns TRZ.TO or WPK.TO?
Winpak Ltd. has a net margin of -1.62% compared to Transat A.T., Inc.'s net margin of 12.9%. Transat A.T., Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Winpak Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.35%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.11.49% -$0.31 $911.1M WPK.TOWinpak Ltd.30.48% $0.82 $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About TRZ.TO or WPK.TO?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.23, signalling upside risk potential of 22.81%. On the other hand Winpak Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $48.22 which suggests that it could grow by 7.51%. Given that Transat A.T., Inc. has higher upside potential than Winpak Ltd., analysts believe Transat A.T., Inc. is more attractive than Winpak Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.1 2 1 WPK.TOWinpak Ltd.1 2 0 -
Is TRZ.TO or WPK.TO More Risky?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.422% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winpak Ltd. has a beta of 0.090, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.042%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRZ.TO or WPK.TO?
Transat A.T., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winpak Ltd. offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Transat A.T., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winpak Ltd. pays out 4.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Winpak Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRZ.TO or WPK.TO?
Transat A.T., Inc. quarterly revenues are $771.6M, which are larger than Winpak Ltd. quarterly revenues of $389.7M. Transat A.T., Inc.'s net income of -$12.5M is lower than Winpak Ltd.'s net income of $50.3M. Notably, Transat A.T., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.48x while Winpak Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transat A.T., Inc. is 0.03x versus 1.76x for Winpak Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRZ.TOTransat A.T., Inc.0.03x 0.48x $771.6M -$12.5M WPK.TOWinpak Ltd.1.76x 14.35x $389.7M $50.3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
