Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
40
TRI.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$182.02
Seasonality move
:
1.72%
Day range:
$180.30 - $182.60
52-week range:
$177.00 - $299.24
Dividend yield:
1.83%
P/E ratio:
33.43x
P/S ratio:
7.95x
P/B ratio:
5.24x
Volume:
1M
Avg. volume:
454.7K
1-year change:
-22.27%
Market cap:
$85.7B
Revenue:
$9.9B
EPS (TTM):
$5.44
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters Corp.
|
$2.5B | $1.16 | 3.9% | -19.36% | $264.47 |
|
BAC.CX
BacTech Environmental Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNA.CX
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters Corp.
|
$182.02 | $264.47 | $85.7B | 33.43x | $0.84 | 1.83% | 7.95x |
|
BAC.CX
BacTech Environmental Corp.
|
$0.0350 | -- | $7.6M | 8.00x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies, Inc.
|
$0.29 | -- | $9.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.
|
$0.0500 | -- | $11M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.73x |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems, Inc.
|
$0.07 | -- | $11.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.52x |
|
SNA.CX
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.
|
$0.0100 | -- | $14.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 193.61x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters Corp.
|
17.04% | -0.725 | 3.3% | 0.47x |
|
BAC.CX
BacTech Environmental Corp.
|
-104.38% | -2.334 | 17.86% | 0.15x |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies, Inc.
|
40.22% | 6.981 | 6.84% | 1.35x |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.
|
45.95% | 0.984 | 17.7% | 0.32x |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems, Inc.
|
220.82% | 2.912 | 25.03% | 0.53x |
|
SNA.CX
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.
|
-16.05% | -1.522 | 11.21% | 0.00x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRI.TO
Thomson Reuters Corp.
|
$603.3M | $603.3M | 11.88% | 14.54% | 24.58% | $748.3M |
|
BAC.CX
BacTech Environmental Corp.
|
-- | -$438.1K | -- | -- | -- | -$374.6K |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | -$533.6K | -366.96% | -1749.63% | -- | -$89.8K |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.
|
-$58.4K | -$58.9K | -80.45% | -1082.71% | -20.88% | -$788.3K |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems, Inc.
|
-$269K | -$713.4K | -205.85% | -2612.73% | -85.96% | -$784K |
|
SNA.CX
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.
|
-$28.8K | -$570.2K | -- | -- | -14917.02% | -$846.9K |
Thomson Reuters Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or BAC.CX?
BacTech Environmental Corp. has a net margin of 24.02% compared to Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net margin of --. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s return on equity of 14.54% beat BacTech Environmental Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.24.58% $1.29 $19.7B BAC.CXBacTech Environmental Corp.-- -$0.00 -$1.5M -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or BAC.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a consensus price target of $264.47, signalling upside risk potential of 44.8%. On the other hand BacTech Environmental Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters Corp. has higher upside potential than BacTech Environmental Corp., analysts believe Thomson Reuters Corp. is more attractive than BacTech Environmental Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.10 3 0 BAC.CXBacTech Environmental Corp.0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or BAC.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a beta of 0.355, which suggesting that the stock is 64.535% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BacTech Environmental Corp. has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.804%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or BAC.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. BacTech Environmental Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters Corp. pays 44.14% of its earnings as a dividend. BacTech Environmental Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or BAC.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than BacTech Environmental Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net income of $589.5M is higher than BacTech Environmental Corp.'s net income of -$503.3K. Notably, Thomson Reuters Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.43x while BacTech Environmental Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters Corp. is 7.95x versus -- for BacTech Environmental Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.7.95x 33.43x $2.5B $589.5M BAC.CXBacTech Environmental Corp.-- 8.00x -- -$503.3K
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or DOCT.CX?
Republic Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 24.02% compared to Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net margin of --. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s return on equity of 14.54% beat Republic Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -1749.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.24.58% $1.29 $19.7B DOCT.CXRepublic Technologies, Inc.-- $0.01 $3.1M -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or DOCT.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a consensus price target of $264.47, signalling upside risk potential of 44.8%. On the other hand Republic Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters Corp. has higher upside potential than Republic Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Thomson Reuters Corp. is more attractive than Republic Technologies, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.10 3 0 DOCT.CXRepublic Technologies, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or DOCT.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a beta of 0.355, which suggesting that the stock is 64.535% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.257%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or DOCT.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Republic Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters Corp. pays 44.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or DOCT.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Republic Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net income of $589.5M is higher than Republic Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $163.7K. Notably, Thomson Reuters Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.43x while Republic Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters Corp. is 7.95x versus -- for Republic Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.7.95x 33.43x $2.5B $589.5M DOCT.CXRepublic Technologies, Inc.-- -- -- $163.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or LUX.CX?
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has a net margin of 24.02% compared to Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net margin of -106.35%. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s return on equity of 14.54% beat Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s return on equity of -1082.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.24.58% $1.29 $19.7B LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures Corp.-20.7% -$0.00 $5.1M -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or LUX.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a consensus price target of $264.47, signalling upside risk potential of 44.8%. On the other hand Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters Corp. has higher upside potential than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp., analysts believe Thomson Reuters Corp. is more attractive than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.10 3 0 LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures Corp.0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or LUX.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a beta of 0.355, which suggesting that the stock is 64.535% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has a beta of 2.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.604%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or LUX.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters Corp. pays 44.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or LUX.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. quarterly revenues of $282.1K. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net income of $589.5M is higher than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s net income of -$300K. Notably, Thomson Reuters Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.43x while Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters Corp. is 7.95x versus 8.73x for Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.7.95x 33.43x $2.5B $589.5M LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures Corp.8.73x -- $282.1K -$300K
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or SHRC.CX?
Sharc International Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 24.02% compared to Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net margin of -88.58%. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s return on equity of 14.54% beat Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -2612.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.24.58% $1.29 $19.7B SHRC.CXSharc International Systems, Inc.-32.41% -$0.00 $1.6M -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or SHRC.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a consensus price target of $264.47, signalling upside risk potential of 44.8%. On the other hand Sharc International Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters Corp. has higher upside potential than Sharc International Systems, Inc., analysts believe Thomson Reuters Corp. is more attractive than Sharc International Systems, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.10 3 0 SHRC.CXSharc International Systems, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or SHRC.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a beta of 0.355, which suggesting that the stock is 64.535% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sharc International Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.767%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or SHRC.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Sharc International Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters Corp. pays 44.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Sharc International Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or SHRC.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Sharc International Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $829.9K. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net income of $589.5M is higher than Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$735.1K. Notably, Thomson Reuters Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.43x while Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters Corp. is 7.95x versus 4.52x for Sharc International Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.7.95x 33.43x $2.5B $589.5M SHRC.CXSharc International Systems, Inc.4.52x -- $829.9K -$735.1K
-
Which has Higher Returns TRI.TO or SNA.CX?
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. has a net margin of 24.02% compared to Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net margin of -15244.79%. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s return on equity of 14.54% beat Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.24.58% $1.29 $19.7B SNA.CXStar Navigation Systems Group Ltd.-1899.17% -$0.00 -$5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About TRI.TO or SNA.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a consensus price target of $264.47, signalling upside risk potential of 44.8%. On the other hand Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters Corp. has higher upside potential than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd., analysts believe Thomson Reuters Corp. is more attractive than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.10 3 0 SNA.CXStar Navigation Systems Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TRI.TO or SNA.CX More Risky?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a beta of 0.355, which suggesting that the stock is 64.535% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.218, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.805%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI.TO or SNA.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters Corp. pays 44.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI.TO or SNA.CX?
Thomson Reuters Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters Corp.'s net income of $589.5M is higher than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.'s net income of -$586.9K. Notably, Thomson Reuters Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.43x while Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters Corp. is 7.95x versus 193.61x for Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRI.TOThomson Reuters Corp.7.95x 33.43x $2.5B $589.5M SNA.CXStar Navigation Systems Group Ltd.193.61x -- -- -$586.9K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
