Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Sell
50
SEA.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$43.41
Seasonality move
:
8.85%
Day range:
$41.55 - $43.64
52-week range:
$13.44 - $43.50
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
237.10x
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
4.20x
Volume:
285.4K
Avg. volume:
182.7K
1-year change:
150.21%
Market cap:
$4.4B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.53
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SEA.TO
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- | -91.11% | $61.25 |
|
AG.TO
First Majestic Silver Corp.
|
$433M | $0.11 | 117.32% | -21.4% | $25.13 |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GSTM.V
Goldstorm Metals Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TUD.V
Tudor Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $2.90 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SEA.TO
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
$42.56 | $61.25 | $4.4B | 237.10x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
AG.TO
First Majestic Silver Corp.
|
$23.78 | $25.13 | $11.7B | 140.88x | $0.01 | 0.12% | 7.66x |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.35x |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
$0.12 | -- | $19.3M | 151.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.81x |
|
GSTM.V
Goldstorm Metals Corp.
|
$0.14 | -- | $14.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TUD.V
Tudor Gold Corp.
|
$0.84 | $2.90 | $330.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SEA.TO
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
35.61% | 3.540 | 16.77% | 2.67x |
|
AG.TO
First Majestic Silver Corp.
|
8.36% | 2.115 | 3.69% | 2.70x |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
21.47% | 2.951 | 5.8% | 0.39x |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
41.88% | 2.344 | 33.1% | 0.25x |
|
GSTM.V
Goldstorm Metals Corp.
|
-- | 0.884 | -- | 3.35x |
|
TUD.V
Tudor Gold Corp.
|
0.1% | 3.440 | 0.05% | 7.05x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SEA.TO
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-$58K | -$4.7M | -3.31% | -5.25% | -- | -$55M |
|
AG.TO
First Majestic Silver Corp.
|
$132.2M | $105.9M | 3.61% | 3.98% | 26.97% | $52.7M |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
$50K | -$390.8K | -138.99% | -167.71% | 88.71% | $38.2K |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
-$558.4K | -$1.2M | -45.73% | -65.23% | -60.25% | -$630.3K |
|
GSTM.V
Goldstorm Metals Corp.
|
-$4.5K | -$658.4K | -4.87% | -4.9% | -- | -$1M |
|
TUD.V
Tudor Gold Corp.
|
-$9.6K | -$1.1M | -2.37% | -2.37% | -- | -$4.8M |
Seabridge Gold, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SEA.TO or AG.TO?
First Majestic Silver Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of 15.07%. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.25% beat First Majestic Silver Corp.'s return on equity of 3.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.32 $1.6B AG.TOFirst Majestic Silver Corp.33.66% $0.08 $4.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SEA.TO or AG.TO?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $61.25, signalling upside risk potential of 43.92%. On the other hand First Majestic Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $25.13 which suggests that it could grow by 4.3%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than First Majestic Silver Corp., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than First Majestic Silver Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 AG.TOFirst Majestic Silver Corp.2 2 0 -
Is SEA.TO or AG.TO More Risky?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Majestic Silver Corp. has a beta of 1.273, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.343%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEA.TO or AG.TO?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Majestic Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Majestic Silver Corp. pays out 5.2% of its earnings as a dividend. First Majestic Silver Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEA.TO or AG.TO?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Majestic Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of $392.6M. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$32.3M is lower than First Majestic Silver Corp.'s net income of $59.2M. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 237.10x while First Majestic Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is 140.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus 7.66x for First Majestic Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 237.10x -- -$32.3M AG.TOFirst Majestic Silver Corp.7.66x 140.88x $392.6M $59.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns SEA.TO or BEE.CX?
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of 25.53%. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.25% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.32 $1.6B BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.61.05% $0.00 $1.4M -
What do Analysts Say About SEA.TO or BEE.CX?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $61.25, signalling upside risk potential of 43.92%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SEA.TO or BEE.CX More Risky?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.573%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEA.TO or BEE.CX?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEA.TO or BEE.CX?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$32.3M is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 237.10x while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 237.10x -- -$32.3M BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.2.35x -- $81.9K $20.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns SEA.TO or ERTH.CX?
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -74.66%. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.25% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.32 $1.6B ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.-28.19% -$0.01 $15.2M -
What do Analysts Say About SEA.TO or ERTH.CX?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $61.25, signalling upside risk potential of 43.92%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 275%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Seabridge Gold, Inc., analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. is more attractive than Seabridge Gold, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SEA.TO or ERTH.CX More Risky?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.18%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEA.TO or ERTH.CX?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEA.TO or ERTH.CX?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$32.3M is lower than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 237.10x while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus 2.81x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 237.10x -- -$32.3M ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.2.81x 151.77x $2M -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns SEA.TO or GSTM.V?
Goldstorm Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.25% beat Goldstorm Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -4.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.32 $1.6B GSTM.VGoldstorm Metals Corp.-- -$0.00 $18.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SEA.TO or GSTM.V?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $61.25, signalling upside risk potential of 43.92%. On the other hand Goldstorm Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Goldstorm Metals Corp., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Goldstorm Metals Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 GSTM.VGoldstorm Metals Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SEA.TO or GSTM.V More Risky?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldstorm Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEA.TO or GSTM.V?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goldstorm Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goldstorm Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEA.TO or GSTM.V?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Goldstorm Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$32.3M is lower than Goldstorm Metals Corp.'s net income of -$478.7K. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 237.10x while Goldstorm Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus -- for Goldstorm Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 237.10x -- -$32.3M GSTM.VGoldstorm Metals Corp.-- -- -- -$478.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns SEA.TO or TUD.V?
Tudor Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.25% beat Tudor Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -2.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.32 $1.6B TUD.VTudor Gold Corp.-- -$0.00 $214.7M -
What do Analysts Say About SEA.TO or TUD.V?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $61.25, signalling upside risk potential of 43.92%. On the other hand Tudor Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.90 which suggests that it could grow by 245.24%. Given that Tudor Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Seabridge Gold, Inc., analysts believe Tudor Gold Corp. is more attractive than Seabridge Gold, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 TUD.VTudor Gold Corp.2 0 0 -
Is SEA.TO or TUD.V More Risky?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tudor Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.762%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEA.TO or TUD.V?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tudor Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tudor Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEA.TO or TUD.V?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tudor Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$32.3M is lower than Tudor Gold Corp.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 237.10x while Tudor Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus -- for Tudor Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEA.TOSeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 237.10x -- -$32.3M TUD.VTudor Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$1.2M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
60
AAOI alert for Dec 23
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 3.95% over the past day.
Buy
60
ZBIO alert for Dec 23
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 1.18% over the past day.
Buy
54
UNF alert for Dec 23
UniFirst Corp. [UNF] is up 0.77% over the past day.
