Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Buy
60
SAU.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.35
Seasonality move
:
5.67%
Day range:
$0.31 - $0.35
52-week range:
$0.07 - $0.60
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
684.21x
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
3.00x
Volume:
59.5K
Avg. volume:
74K
1-year change:
337.5%
Market cap:
$547M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAU.TO
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NPK.TO
Verde AgriTech Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAU.TO
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.
|
$0.35 | -- | $547M | 684.21x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
$0.64 | -- | $14.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.35x |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
$0.14 | -- | $22.5M | 151.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.28x |
|
NPK.TO
Verde AgriTech Ltd.
|
$1.07 | -- | $56.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.43x |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $605.6K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAU.TO
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.
|
-- | 0.590 | -- | 5.27x |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | 0.758 | -- | 5.08x |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
21.47% | 2.951 | 5.8% | 0.39x |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
41.88% | 2.344 | 33.1% | 0.25x |
|
NPK.TO
Verde AgriTech Ltd.
|
66.35% | 0.985 | 187.72% | 1.66x |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAU.TO
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.
|
-- | -$661.5K | -1.67% | -1.67% | -- | -$383.5K |
|
ARGO.CX
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -$1.2M | -1103.05% | -1103.05% | -- | -$630.9K |
|
BEE.CX
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.
|
$50K | -$390.8K | -138.99% | -167.71% | 88.71% | $38.2K |
|
ERTH.CX
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.
|
-$558.4K | -$1.2M | -45.73% | -65.23% | -60.25% | -$630.3K |
|
NPK.TO
Verde AgriTech Ltd.
|
$3.7M | -$691K | -15.25% | -38.55% | -11.77% | $1.4M |
|
OPC.CX
Organic Potash Corp.
|
-- | -$16.2K | -- | -- | -- | -$43.6K |
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SAU.TO or ARGO.CX?
Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s net margin of --. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.67% beat Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of -1103.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.-- -$0.00 $182.2M ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.-- -$0.06 $468.6K -
What do Analysts Say About SAU.TO or ARGO.CX?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has higher upside potential than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp., analysts believe St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. is more attractive than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.0 0 0 ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SAU.TO or ARGO.CX More Risky?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a beta of 1.561, which suggesting that the stock is 56.057% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAU.TO or ARGO.CX?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAU.TO or ARGO.CX?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of --. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s net income of -$748K is higher than Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 684.21x while Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. is -- versus -- for Argo Graphene Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.-- 684.21x -- -$748K ARGO.CXArgo Graphene Solutions Corp.-- -- -- -$1.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns SAU.TO or BEE.CX?
Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s net margin of 25.53%. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.67% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.-- -$0.00 $182.2M BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.61.05% $0.00 $1.4M -
What do Analysts Say About SAU.TO or BEE.CX?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.0 0 0 BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SAU.TO or BEE.CX More Risky?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a beta of 1.561, which suggesting that the stock is 56.057% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.573%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAU.TO or BEE.CX?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAU.TO or BEE.CX?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s net income of -$748K is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 684.21x while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. is -- versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.-- 684.21x -- -$748K BEE.CXBee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.2.35x -- $81.9K $20.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns SAU.TO or ERTH.CX?
Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s net margin of -74.66%. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.67% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.-- -$0.00 $182.2M ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.-28.19% -$0.01 $15.2M -
What do Analysts Say About SAU.TO or ERTH.CX?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 221.43%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd., analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. is more attractive than St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.0 0 0 ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SAU.TO or ERTH.CX More Risky?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a beta of 1.561, which suggesting that the stock is 56.057% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.18%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAU.TO or ERTH.CX?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAU.TO or ERTH.CX?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s net income of -$748K is higher than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 684.21x while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. is -- versus 3.28x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.-- 684.21x -- -$748K ERTH.CXReplenish Nutrients Holding Corp.3.28x 151.77x $2M -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns SAU.TO or NPK.TO?
Verde AgriTech Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s net margin of -35.52%. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.67% beat Verde AgriTech Ltd.'s return on equity of -38.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.-- -$0.00 $182.2M NPK.TOVerde AgriTech Ltd.62.47% -$0.04 $73.8M -
What do Analysts Say About SAU.TO or NPK.TO?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Verde AgriTech Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has higher upside potential than Verde AgriTech Ltd., analysts believe St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. is more attractive than Verde AgriTech Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.0 0 0 NPK.TOVerde AgriTech Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SAU.TO or NPK.TO More Risky?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a beta of 1.561, which suggesting that the stock is 56.057% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verde AgriTech Ltd. has a beta of 2.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.384%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAU.TO or NPK.TO?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verde AgriTech Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verde AgriTech Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAU.TO or NPK.TO?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Verde AgriTech Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.9M. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s net income of -$748K is higher than Verde AgriTech Ltd.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 684.21x while Verde AgriTech Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. is -- versus 3.43x for Verde AgriTech Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.-- 684.21x -- -$748K NPK.TOVerde AgriTech Ltd.3.43x -- $5.9M -$2.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns SAU.TO or OPC.CX?
Organic Potash Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s net margin of --. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.67% beat Organic Potash Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.-- -$0.00 $182.2M OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.-- -$0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About SAU.TO or OPC.CX?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Organic Potash Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has higher upside potential than Organic Potash Corp., analysts believe St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. is more attractive than Organic Potash Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.0 0 0 OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SAU.TO or OPC.CX More Risky?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a beta of 1.561, which suggesting that the stock is 56.057% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash Corp. has a beta of -0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 166.856%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAU.TO or OPC.CX?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAU.TO or OPC.CX?
St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Organic Potash Corp. quarterly revenues of --. St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s net income of -$748K is lower than Organic Potash Corp.'s net income of -$23.7K. Notably, St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 684.21x while Organic Potash Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for St. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd. is -- versus -- for Organic Potash Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAU.TOSt. Augustine Gold & Copper Ltd.-- 684.21x -- -$748K OPC.CXOrganic Potash Corp.-- -- -- -$23.7K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
