RUS.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Republic Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 3% compared to Russel Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Russel Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.15% beat Republic Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Russel Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $49.86, signalling upside risk potential of 21.07%. On the other hand Republic Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Russel Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Republic Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Russel Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Republic Technologies, Inc..

Russel Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.228, which suggesting that the stock is 22.783% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.257%.

Russel Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Republic Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Russel Metals, Inc. pays 61.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Russel Metals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Russel Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Republic Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Russel Metals, Inc.'s net income of $35M is higher than Republic Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $163.7K. Notably, Russel Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.09x while Republic Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russel Metals, Inc. is 0.51x versus -- for Republic Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has a net margin of 3% compared to Russel Metals, Inc.'s net margin of -536.54%. Russel Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.15% beat Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s return on equity of -438.68%.

Russel Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $49.86, signalling upside risk potential of 21.07%. On the other hand Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Russel Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp., analysts believe Russel Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp..

Russel Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.228, which suggesting that the stock is 22.783% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has a beta of 2.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.604%.

Russel Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Russel Metals, Inc. pays 61.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Russel Metals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Russel Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. quarterly revenues of $188.4K. Russel Metals, Inc.'s net income of $35M is higher than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s net income of -$1M. Notably, Russel Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.09x while Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russel Metals, Inc. is 0.51x versus 6.00x for Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sharc International Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 3% compared to Russel Metals, Inc.'s net margin of -96.65%. Russel Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.15% beat Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -2612.73%.

Russel Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $49.86, signalling upside risk potential of 21.07%. On the other hand Sharc International Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Russel Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sharc International Systems, Inc., analysts believe Russel Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Sharc International Systems, Inc..

Russel Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.228, which suggesting that the stock is 22.783% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sharc International Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.767%.

Russel Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Sharc International Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Russel Metals, Inc. pays 61.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Sharc International Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Russel Metals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Russel Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Sharc International Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $829.9K. Russel Metals, Inc.'s net income of $35M is higher than Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$735.1K. Notably, Russel Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.09x while Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russel Metals, Inc. is 0.51x versus 4.52x for Sharc International Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wajax Corp. has a net margin of 3% compared to Russel Metals, Inc.'s net margin of 3.46%. Russel Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.15% beat Wajax Corp.'s return on equity of 8.93%.

Russel Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $49.86, signalling upside risk potential of 21.07%. On the other hand Wajax Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $26.25 which suggests that it could fall by -4.55%. Given that Russel Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Wajax Corp., analysts believe Russel Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Wajax Corp..

Russel Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.228, which suggesting that the stock is 22.783% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wajax Corp. has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.847%.

Russel Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Wajax Corp. offers a yield of 5.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Russel Metals, Inc. pays 61.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Wajax Corp. pays out 71.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Russel Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Wajax Corp. quarterly revenues of $483.1M. Russel Metals, Inc.'s net income of $35M is higher than Wajax Corp.'s net income of $16.7M. Notably, Russel Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.09x while Wajax Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russel Metals, Inc. is 0.51x versus 0.28x for Wajax Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.