RS.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Sol Strategies, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Real Estate Split Corp.'s net margin of -324.27%. Real Estate Split Corp.'s return on equity of -8.46% beat Sol Strategies, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.19%.

Real Estate Split Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sol Strategies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1083.67%. Given that Sol Strategies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Real Estate Split Corp., analysts believe Sol Strategies, Inc. is more attractive than Real Estate Split Corp..

Real Estate Split Corp. has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sol Strategies, Inc. has a beta of 2.695, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.514%.

Real Estate Split Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.35%. Sol Strategies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Real Estate Split Corp. pays 172.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Sol Strategies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Real Estate Split Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sol Strategies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Real Estate Split Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Sol Strategies, Inc.'s net income of -$8.2M. Notably, Real Estate Split Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.98x while Sol Strategies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Real Estate Split Corp. is 14.92x versus 10.07x for Sol Strategies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Wellness Strategies has a net margin of -- compared to Real Estate Split Corp.'s net margin of --. Real Estate Split Corp.'s return on equity of -8.46% beat Global Wellness Strategies's return on equity of --.

Real Estate Split Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Wellness Strategies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Real Estate Split Corp. has higher upside potential than Global Wellness Strategies, analysts believe Real Estate Split Corp. is more attractive than Global Wellness Strategies.

Real Estate Split Corp. has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Wellness Strategies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Real Estate Split Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.35%. Global Wellness Strategies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Real Estate Split Corp. pays 172.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Wellness Strategies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Real Estate Split Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global Wellness Strategies quarterly revenues of --. Real Estate Split Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Global Wellness Strategies's net income of --. Notably, Real Estate Split Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.98x while Global Wellness Strategies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Real Estate Split Corp. is 14.92x versus -- for Global Wellness Strategies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quinsam Capital Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Real Estate Split Corp.'s net margin of -3.32%. Real Estate Split Corp.'s return on equity of -8.46% beat Quinsam Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -41.93%.

Real Estate Split Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quinsam Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Real Estate Split Corp. has higher upside potential than Quinsam Capital Corp., analysts believe Real Estate Split Corp. is more attractive than Quinsam Capital Corp..

Real Estate Split Corp. has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quinsam Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.05%.

Real Estate Split Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.35%. Quinsam Capital Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Real Estate Split Corp. pays 172.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Quinsam Capital Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Real Estate Split Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Quinsam Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of -$4M. Real Estate Split Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Quinsam Capital Corp.'s net income of $132.1K. Notably, Real Estate Split Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.98x while Quinsam Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Real Estate Split Corp. is 14.92x versus -- for Quinsam Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Real Estate Split Corp.'s net margin of --. Real Estate Split Corp.'s return on equity of -8.46% beat New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Real Estate Split Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Real Estate Split Corp. has higher upside potential than New Frontier Ventures, Inc., analysts believe Real Estate Split Corp. is more attractive than New Frontier Ventures, Inc..

Real Estate Split Corp. has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has a beta of -0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.578%.

Real Estate Split Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.35%. New Frontier Ventures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Real Estate Split Corp. pays 172.9% of its earnings as a dividend. New Frontier Ventures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Real Estate Split Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than New Frontier Ventures, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Real Estate Split Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s net income of -$10.5K. Notably, Real Estate Split Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.98x while New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Real Estate Split Corp. is 14.92x versus 29.93x for New Frontier Ventures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.