Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Sell
27
RIRA.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$17.88
Seasonality move
:
-0.6%
Day range:
$17.43 - $18.03
52-week range:
$16.50 - $18.61
Dividend yield:
4.3%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
19K
Avg. volume:
2.8K
1-year change:
4.26%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RIRA.TO
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGRW.TO
Forstrong Global Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRCC.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PLV.TO
Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UYLD.NO
Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RIRA.TO
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF
|
$17.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 4.3% | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
$23.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 2.16% | -- |
|
FGRW.TO
Forstrong Global Growth ETF
|
$22.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 1.48% | -- |
|
GRCC.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF
|
$22.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 7.99% | -- |
|
PLV.TO
Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF
|
$25.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 3.1% | -- |
|
UYLD.NO
Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RIRA.TO
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF
|
-- | 0.716 | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | 0.398 | -- | -- |
|
FGRW.TO
Forstrong Global Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.028 | -- | -- |
|
GRCC.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF
|
-- | 0.228 | -- | -- |
|
PLV.TO
Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF
|
-- | 0.362 | -- | -- |
|
UYLD.NO
Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RIRA.TO
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGRW.TO
Forstrong Global Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRCC.TO
Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PLV.TO
Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UYLD.NO
Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RIRA.TO or CBGR.TO?
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's net margin of --. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF-- -- -- CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RIRA.TO or CBGR.TO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF, analysts believe Russell Investments Real Assets ETF is more attractive than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF0 0 0 CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF0 0 0 -
Is RIRA.TO or CBGR.TO More Risky?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RIRA.TO or CBGR.TO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.3%. CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RIRA.TO or CBGR.TO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF quarterly revenues of --. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's net income of --. Notably, Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russell Investments Real Assets ETF is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF-- -- -- -- CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RIRA.TO or FGRW.TO?
Forstrong Global Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's net margin of --. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's return on equity of -- beat Forstrong Global Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF-- -- -- FGRW.TOForstrong Global Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RIRA.TO or FGRW.TO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Forstrong Global Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has higher upside potential than Forstrong Global Growth ETF, analysts believe Russell Investments Real Assets ETF is more attractive than Forstrong Global Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF0 0 0 FGRW.TOForstrong Global Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is RIRA.TO or FGRW.TO More Risky?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forstrong Global Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RIRA.TO or FGRW.TO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.3%. Forstrong Global Growth ETF offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forstrong Global Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RIRA.TO or FGRW.TO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Forstrong Global Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's net income of -- is lower than Forstrong Global Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forstrong Global Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russell Investments Real Assets ETF is -- versus -- for Forstrong Global Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF-- -- -- -- FGRW.TOForstrong Global Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RIRA.TO or GRCC.TO?
Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's net margin of --. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF-- -- -- GRCC.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RIRA.TO or GRCC.TO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF, analysts believe Russell Investments Real Assets ETF is more attractive than Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF0 0 0 GRCC.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF0 0 0 -
Is RIRA.TO or GRCC.TO More Risky?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RIRA.TO or GRCC.TO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.3%. Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF offers a yield of 7.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RIRA.TO or GRCC.TO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues of --. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF's net income of --. Notably, Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russell Investments Real Assets ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF-- -- -- -- GRCC.TOGlobal X Growth Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RIRA.TO or PLV.TO?
Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's net margin of --. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF-- -- -- PLV.TOInvesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RIRA.TO or PLV.TO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF, analysts believe Russell Investments Real Assets ETF is more attractive than Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF0 0 0 PLV.TOInvesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF0 0 0 -
Is RIRA.TO or PLV.TO More Risky?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.839%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RIRA.TO or PLV.TO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.3%. Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RIRA.TO or PLV.TO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF quarterly revenues of --. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF's net income of --. Notably, Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russell Investments Real Assets ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF-- -- -- -- PLV.TOInvesco Low Volatility Portfolio ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RIRA.TO or UYLD.NO?
Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd has a net margin of -- compared to Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's net margin of --. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's return on equity of -- beat Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF-- -- -- UYLD.NOManulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RIRA.TO or UYLD.NO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has higher upside potential than Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd, analysts believe Russell Investments Real Assets ETF is more attractive than Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF0 0 0 UYLD.NOManulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd0 0 0 -
Is RIRA.TO or UYLD.NO More Risky?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RIRA.TO or UYLD.NO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.3%. Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RIRA.TO or UYLD.NO?
Russell Investments Real Assets ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd quarterly revenues of --. Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's net income of -- is lower than Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd's net income of --. Notably, Russell Investments Real Assets ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russell Investments Real Assets ETF is -- versus -- for Manulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RIRA.TORussell Investments Real Assets ETF-- -- -- -- UYLD.NOManulife Smart U.S. Enhanced Yld ETF Hgd-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.
