Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
55
QUB.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$81.62
Seasonality move
:
0.54%
Day range:
$81.53 - $81.62
52-week range:
$78.94 - $83.29
Dividend yield:
3.05%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
321
Avg. volume:
1.6K
1-year change:
1.05%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QUB.TO
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VBU.NO
Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XAGH.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZTL.NO
BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZTM.NO
BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZTS.NO
BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QUB.TO
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
$81.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 3.05% | -- |
|
VBU.NO
Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
XAGH.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
$33.43 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 3.69% | -- |
|
ZTL.NO
BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ZTM.NO
BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ZTS.NO
BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QUB.TO
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | 1.538 | -- | -- |
|
VBU.NO
Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
XAGH.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | 1.557 | -- | -- |
|
ZTL.NO
BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
ZTM.NO
BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
ZTS.NO
BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QUB.TO
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VBU.NO
Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XAGH.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZTL.NO
BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZTM.NO
BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZTS.NO
BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns QUB.TO or VBU.NO?
Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net margin of --. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of -- beat Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- VBU.NOVanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QUB.TO or VBU.NO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has higher upside potential than Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H, analysts believe Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) is more attractive than Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 VBU.NOVanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H0 0 0 -
Is QUB.TO or VBU.NO More Risky?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 1.224, which suggesting that the stock is 22.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QUB.TO or VBU.NO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QUB.TO or VBU.NO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of -- is lower than Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) is -- versus -- for Vanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -- VBU.NOVanguard US Aggregate Bond ETF CAD-H-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QUB.TO or XAGH.TO?
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net margin of --. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of -- beat iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- XAGH.TOiShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QUB.TO or XAGH.TO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has higher upside potential than iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged), analysts believe Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) is more attractive than iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 XAGH.TOiShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 -
Is QUB.TO or XAGH.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 1.224, which suggesting that the stock is 22.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QUB.TO or XAGH.TO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QUB.TO or XAGH.TO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of -- is lower than iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) is -- versus -- for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -- XAGH.TOiShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QUB.TO or ZTL.NO?
BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net margin of --. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of -- beat BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- ZTL.NOBMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QUB.TO or ZTL.NO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has higher upside potential than BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) is more attractive than BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 ZTL.NOBMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is QUB.TO or ZTL.NO More Risky?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 1.224, which suggesting that the stock is 22.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QUB.TO or ZTL.NO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QUB.TO or ZTL.NO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of -- is lower than BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) is -- versus -- for BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -- ZTL.NOBMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QUB.TO or ZTM.NO?
BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net margin of --. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of -- beat BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- ZTM.NOBMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QUB.TO or ZTM.NO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has higher upside potential than BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) is more attractive than BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 ZTM.NOBMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is QUB.TO or ZTM.NO More Risky?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 1.224, which suggesting that the stock is 22.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QUB.TO or ZTM.NO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QUB.TO or ZTM.NO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of -- is lower than BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) is -- versus -- for BMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -- ZTM.NOBMO Mid-Term US Treasury Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QUB.TO or ZTS.NO?
BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net margin of --. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of -- beat BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- ZTS.NOBMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QUB.TO or ZTS.NO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has higher upside potential than BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) is more attractive than BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 ZTS.NOBMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is QUB.TO or ZTS.NO More Risky?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 1.224, which suggesting that the stock is 22.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QUB.TO or ZTS.NO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QUB.TO or ZTS.NO?
Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of -- is lower than BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) is -- versus -- for BMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QUB.TOMackenzie US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -- ZTS.NOBMO Short-Term US Treasury Bond ETF-- -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
40
HUT alert for Dec 17
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 14.08% over the past day.
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 17
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 21.72% over the past day.
Sell
45
ZBIO alert for Dec 17
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is down 2.49% over the past day.
