PSD.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Matachewan Consolidated Mines Ltd. has a net margin of -43.91% compared to Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s net margin of 76.34%. Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s return on equity of 106.81% beat Matachewan Consolidated Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 44.11%.

Pulse Seismic, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -34.38%. On the other hand Matachewan Consolidated Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pulse Seismic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Matachewan Consolidated Mines Ltd., analysts believe Pulse Seismic, Inc. is more attractive than Matachewan Consolidated Mines Ltd..

Pulse Seismic, Inc. has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.789% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matachewan Consolidated Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.074%.

Pulse Seismic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Matachewan Consolidated Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pulse Seismic, Inc. pays 91.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Matachewan Consolidated Mines Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pulse Seismic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are larger than Matachewan Consolidated Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $51.7K. Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than Matachewan Consolidated Mines Ltd.'s net income of $1.9M. Notably, Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.32x while Matachewan Consolidated Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pulse Seismic, Inc. is 3.25x versus 3.31x for Matachewan Consolidated Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mega Uranium Ltd. has a net margin of -43.91% compared to Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s net margin of --. Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s return on equity of 106.81% beat Mega Uranium Ltd.'s return on equity of -2.53%.

Pulse Seismic, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -34.38%. On the other hand Mega Uranium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 168.04%. Given that Mega Uranium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pulse Seismic, Inc., analysts believe Mega Uranium Ltd. is more attractive than Pulse Seismic, Inc..

Pulse Seismic, Inc. has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.789% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mega Uranium Ltd. has a beta of 1.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.688%.

Pulse Seismic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Mega Uranium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pulse Seismic, Inc. pays 91.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Mega Uranium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pulse Seismic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are larger than Mega Uranium Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than Mega Uranium Ltd.'s net income of $5.5M. Notably, Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.32x while Mega Uranium Ltd.'s PE ratio is 30.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pulse Seismic, Inc. is 3.25x versus -- for Mega Uranium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Suncor Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -43.91% compared to Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s net margin of 12.9%. Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s return on equity of 106.81% beat Suncor Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.73%.

Pulse Seismic, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -34.38%. On the other hand Suncor Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $66.70 which suggests that it could grow by 12.86%. Given that Suncor Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pulse Seismic, Inc., analysts believe Suncor Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Pulse Seismic, Inc..

Pulse Seismic, Inc. has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.789% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Suncor Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.771%.

Pulse Seismic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Suncor Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Pulse Seismic, Inc. pays 91.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Suncor Energy, Inc. pays out 46.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pulse Seismic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are smaller than Suncor Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.6B. Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than Suncor Energy, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B. Notably, Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.32x while Suncor Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pulse Seismic, Inc. is 3.25x versus 1.48x for Suncor Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Whitecap Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -43.91% compared to Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s net margin of 13.19%. Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s return on equity of 106.81% beat Whitecap Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.62%.

Pulse Seismic, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -34.38%. On the other hand Whitecap Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.63 which suggests that it could grow by 18.69%. Given that Whitecap Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pulse Seismic, Inc., analysts believe Whitecap Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Pulse Seismic, Inc..

Pulse Seismic, Inc. has a beta of 0.392, which suggesting that the stock is 60.789% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Whitecap Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.096%.

Pulse Seismic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Whitecap Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 6.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Pulse Seismic, Inc. pays 91.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Whitecap Resources, Inc. pays out 53.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pulse Seismic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are smaller than Whitecap Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M is lower than Whitecap Resources, Inc.'s net income of $204.2M. Notably, Pulse Seismic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.32x while Whitecap Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pulse Seismic, Inc. is 3.25x versus 2.13x for Whitecap Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.