OR.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a net margin of 31.94% compared to Osisko Gold Royalties's net margin of 25.53%. Osisko Gold Royalties's return on equity of -3.27% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International's return on equity of -167.71%.

Osisko Gold Royalties has a consensus price target of $32.45, signalling upside risk potential of 23.68%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Osisko Gold Royalties has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, analysts believe Osisko Gold Royalties is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International.

Osisko Gold Royalties has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.509% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Osisko Gold Royalties has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Osisko Gold Royalties pays -82.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Osisko Gold Royalties quarterly revenues are $57.3M, which are larger than Bee Vectoring Technologies International quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Osisko Gold Royalties's net income of $18.3M is higher than Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net income of $20.9K. Notably, Osisko Gold Royalties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bee Vectoring Technologies International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Osisko Gold Royalties is 19.76x versus 1.37x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding has a net margin of 31.94% compared to Osisko Gold Royalties's net margin of 83.06%. Osisko Gold Royalties's return on equity of -3.27% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding's return on equity of -1.35%.

Osisko Gold Royalties has a consensus price target of $32.45, signalling upside risk potential of 23.68%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1025%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding has higher upside potential than Osisko Gold Royalties, analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding is more attractive than Osisko Gold Royalties.

Osisko Gold Royalties has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.509% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding has a beta of 1.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.276%.

Osisko Gold Royalties has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Replenish Nutrients Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Osisko Gold Royalties pays -82.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Osisko Gold Royalties quarterly revenues are $57.3M, which are larger than Replenish Nutrients Holding quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Osisko Gold Royalties's net income of $18.3M is higher than Replenish Nutrients Holding's net income of $1.8M. Notably, Osisko Gold Royalties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding's PE ratio is 67.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Osisko Gold Royalties is 19.76x versus 0.72x for Replenish Nutrients Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Falco Resources has a net margin of 31.94% compared to Osisko Gold Royalties's net margin of --. Osisko Gold Royalties's return on equity of -3.27% beat Falco Resources's return on equity of --.

Osisko Gold Royalties has a consensus price target of $32.45, signalling upside risk potential of 23.68%. On the other hand Falco Resources has an analysts' consensus of $0.80 which suggests that it could grow by 167.24%. Given that Falco Resources has higher upside potential than Osisko Gold Royalties, analysts believe Falco Resources is more attractive than Osisko Gold Royalties.

Osisko Gold Royalties has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.509% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Falco Resources has a beta of 1.526, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.647%.

Osisko Gold Royalties has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Falco Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Osisko Gold Royalties pays -82.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Falco Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Osisko Gold Royalties quarterly revenues are $57.3M, which are larger than Falco Resources quarterly revenues of --. Osisko Gold Royalties's net income of $18.3M is higher than Falco Resources's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Osisko Gold Royalties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Falco Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Osisko Gold Royalties is 19.76x versus -- for Falco Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Organic Potash has a net margin of 31.94% compared to Osisko Gold Royalties's net margin of --. Osisko Gold Royalties's return on equity of -3.27% beat Organic Potash's return on equity of --.

Osisko Gold Royalties has a consensus price target of $32.45, signalling upside risk potential of 23.68%. On the other hand Organic Potash has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Osisko Gold Royalties has higher upside potential than Organic Potash, analysts believe Osisko Gold Royalties is more attractive than Organic Potash.

Osisko Gold Royalties has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.509% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash has a beta of 0.508, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.183%.

Osisko Gold Royalties has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Organic Potash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Osisko Gold Royalties pays -82.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Osisko Gold Royalties quarterly revenues are $57.3M, which are larger than Organic Potash quarterly revenues of --. Osisko Gold Royalties's net income of $18.3M is higher than Organic Potash's net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Osisko Gold Royalties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Organic Potash's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Osisko Gold Royalties is 19.76x versus -- for Organic Potash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.