Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
32
MGB.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$16.15
Seasonality move
:
-1.23%
Day range:
$16.11 - $16.13
52-week range:
$15.76 - $16.41
Dividend yield:
4.29%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.6K
Avg. volume:
3.2K
1-year change:
-0.12%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGB.TO
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGIN.TO
CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGSB.NO
Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCON.TO
PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QDXB.TO
Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XSE.TO
iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGB.TO
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF
|
$16.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 4.29% | -- |
|
CGIN.TO
CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series
|
$21.19 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 4.82% | -- |
|
MGSB.NO
Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PCON.TO
PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series
|
$18.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 6.68% | -- |
|
QDXB.TO
Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
$88.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 1.94% | -- |
|
XSE.TO
iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
$17.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 3.51% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGB.TO
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | 1.544 | -- | -- |
|
CGIN.TO
CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series
|
-- | 0.699 | -- | -- |
|
MGSB.NO
Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PCON.TO
PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series
|
-- | 0.584 | -- | -- |
|
QDXB.TO
Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | 1.247 | -- | -- |
|
XSE.TO
iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | 0.791 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGB.TO
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGIN.TO
CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGSB.NO
Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCON.TO
PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QDXB.TO
Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XSE.TO
iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MGB.TO or CGIN.TO?
CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- CGIN.TOCI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MGB.TO or CGIN.TO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has higher upside potential than CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series, analysts believe Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF is more attractive than CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 CGIN.TOCI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series0 0 0 -
Is MGB.TO or CGIN.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.85% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGB.TO or CGIN.TO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series offers a yield of 4.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGB.TO or CGIN.TO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF is -- versus -- for CI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -- CGIN.TOCI Global Investment Grade ETF C$ Series-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MGB.TO or MGSB.NO?
Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- MGSB.NOMackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MGB.TO or MGSB.NO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF is more attractive than Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 MGSB.NOMackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is MGB.TO or MGSB.NO More Risky?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.85% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGB.TO or MGSB.NO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGB.TO or MGSB.NO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -- MGSB.NOMackenzie Global Sustainable Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MGB.TO or PCON.TO?
PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- PCON.TOPIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MGB.TO or PCON.TO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series, analysts believe Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF is more attractive than PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 PCON.TOPIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series0 0 0 -
Is MGB.TO or PCON.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.85% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.249%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGB.TO or PCON.TO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series offers a yield of 6.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGB.TO or PCON.TO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -- PCON.TOPIMCO Managed Conservative Bond Pool - ETF Series-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MGB.TO or QDXB.TO?
Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- QDXB.TOMackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MGB.TO or QDXB.TO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged), analysts believe Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF is more attractive than Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 QDXB.TOMackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 -
Is MGB.TO or QDXB.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.85% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.587%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGB.TO or QDXB.TO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGB.TO or QDXB.TO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -- QDXB.TOMackenzie Dev ex-NA Aggrt Bd Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MGB.TO or XSE.TO?
iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- XSE.TOiShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MGB.TO or XSE.TO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF is more attractive than iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 XSE.TOiShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is MGB.TO or XSE.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.85% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.15%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGB.TO or XSE.TO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGB.TO or XSE.TO?
Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGB.TOMackenzie Core Plus Global Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -- XSE.TOiShares Conservative Strategic Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
85
HUT alert for Dec 25
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
63
GPCR alert for Dec 25
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.
