Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Buy
80
MCLV.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$27.10
Seasonality move
:
11.88%
Day range:
$27.05 - $27.10
52-week range:
$21.04 - $27.13
Dividend yield:
1.75%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
624
Avg. volume:
2.1K
1-year change:
20.41%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRMC.TO
Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESGC.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ETSX.TO
Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCCA.NO
Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZIU.TO
BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF
|
$27.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 1.75% | -- |
|
DRMC.TO
Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF
|
$40.95 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 1.74% | -- |
|
ESGC.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD)
|
$37.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 2.04% | -- |
|
ETSX.TO
Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF
|
$23.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 9.28% | -- |
|
FCCA.NO
Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ZIU.TO
BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
|
$70.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 2.26% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | 0.711 | -- | -- |
|
DRMC.TO
Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF
|
-- | 0.997 | -- | -- |
|
ESGC.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD)
|
-- | 1.064 | -- | -- |
|
ETSX.TO
Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF
|
-- | 0.918 | -- | -- |
|
FCCA.NO
Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
ZIU.TO
BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
|
-- | 1.006 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCLV.TO
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRMC.TO
Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESGC.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ETSX.TO
Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCCA.NO
Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZIU.TO
BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MCLV.TO or DRMC.TO?
Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- DRMC.TODesjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCLV.TO or DRMC.TO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 DRMC.TODesjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF0 0 0 -
Is MCLV.TO or DRMC.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.076%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCLV.TO or DRMC.TO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCLV.TO or DRMC.TO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for Desjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- DRMC.TODesjardins RI Canada NetZero Emissions Pathway ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MCLV.TO or ESGC.TO?
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD) has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- ESGC.TOInvesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCLV.TO or ESGC.TO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD), analysts believe Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 ESGC.TOInvesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD)0 0 0 -
Is MCLV.TO or ESGC.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD) has a beta of 0.950, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.995%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCLV.TO or ESGC.TO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD) offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCLV.TO or ESGC.TO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD) quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD)'s net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- ESGC.TOInvesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (CAD)-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MCLV.TO or ETSX.TO?
Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- ETSX.TOEvolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCLV.TO or ETSX.TO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 ETSX.TOEvolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF0 0 0 -
Is MCLV.TO or ETSX.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCLV.TO or ETSX.TO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF offers a yield of 9.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCLV.TO or ETSX.TO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- ETSX.TOEvolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MCLV.TO or FCCA.NO?
Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- FCCA.NOFidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCLV.TO or FCCA.NO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 FCCA.NOFidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is MCLV.TO or FCCA.NO More Risky?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCLV.TO or FCCA.NO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCLV.TO or FCCA.NO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- FCCA.NOFidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MCLV.TO or ZIU.TO?
BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- ZIU.TOBMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCLV.TO or ZIU.TO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 ZIU.TOBMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is MCLV.TO or ZIU.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCLV.TO or ZIU.TO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCLV.TO or ZIU.TO?
Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCLV.TOMackenzie GQE Canada Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- ZIU.TOBMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
55
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
36
INSP alert for Dec 19
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. [INSP] is down 19.66% over the past day.
Sell
40
INSM alert for Dec 19
Insmed, Inc. [INSM] is down 16.08% over the past day.
Buy
52
BIRK alert for Dec 19
Birkenstock Holding Plc [BIRK] is down 11.49% over the past day.
