Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
49
MCAD.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$100.22
Seasonality move
:
-0.09%
Day range:
$100.19 - $100.19
52-week range:
$99.97 - $100.49
Dividend yield:
2.93%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
270
Avg. volume:
1K
1-year change:
-0.09%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCAD.TO
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GCTB.TO
Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUSD.U.TO
US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOLX.B.TO
CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCAD.TO
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units
|
$100.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 2.93% | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
$27.13 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.5% | -- |
|
GCTB.TO
Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF
|
$50.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 2.64% | -- |
|
MUSD.U.TO
US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF
|
$100.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 4.28% | -- |
|
SOLX.B.TO
CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series
|
$9.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCAD.TO
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units
|
-- | -0.009 | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | 0.625 | -- | -- |
|
GCTB.TO
Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF
|
-- | -0.007 | -- | -- |
|
MUSD.U.TO
US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF
|
-- | 0.004 | -- | -- |
|
SOLX.B.TO
CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCAD.TO
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GCTB.TO
Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUSD.U.TO
US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOLX.B.TO
CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MCAD.TO or CBGR.TO?
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's net margin of --. Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCAD.TOPremium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units-- -- -- CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCAD.TO or CBGR.TO?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF, analysts believe Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units is more attractive than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCAD.TOPremium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units0 0 0 CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF0 0 0 -
Is MCAD.TO or CBGR.TO More Risky?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCAD.TO or CBGR.TO?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCAD.TO or CBGR.TO?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF quarterly revenues of --. Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's net income of --. Notably, Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCAD.TOPremium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units-- -- -- -- CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MCAD.TO or GCTB.TO?
Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's net margin of --. Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's return on equity of -- beat Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCAD.TOPremium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units-- -- -- GCTB.TOGuardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCAD.TO or GCTB.TO?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has higher upside potential than Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF, analysts believe Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units is more attractive than Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCAD.TOPremium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units0 0 0 GCTB.TOGuardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF0 0 0 -
Is MCAD.TO or GCTB.TO More Risky?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCAD.TO or GCTB.TO?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCAD.TO or GCTB.TO?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's net income of -- is lower than Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units is -- versus -- for Guardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCAD.TOPremium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units-- -- -- -- GCTB.TOGuardian Ultra-Short Canadian T-Bill Fund ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MCAD.TO or MUSD.U.TO?
US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's net margin of --. Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's return on equity of -- beat US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCAD.TOPremium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units-- -- -- MUSD.U.TOUS Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCAD.TO or MUSD.U.TO?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has higher upside potential than US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF, analysts believe Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units is more attractive than US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCAD.TOPremium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units0 0 0 MUSD.U.TOUS Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF0 0 0 -
Is MCAD.TO or MUSD.U.TO More Risky?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCAD.TO or MUSD.U.TO?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF offers a yield of 4.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCAD.TO or MUSD.U.TO?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF quarterly revenues of --. Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's net income of -- is lower than US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF's net income of --. Notably, Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units is -- versus -- for US Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCAD.TOPremium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units-- -- -- -- MUSD.U.TOUS Premium Cash Management Fund USD Unhedged ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MCAD.TO or SOLX.B.TO?
CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series has a net margin of -- compared to Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's net margin of --. Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's return on equity of -- beat CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCAD.TOPremium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units-- -- -- SOLX.B.TOCI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MCAD.TO or SOLX.B.TO?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has higher upside potential than CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series, analysts believe Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units is more attractive than CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCAD.TOPremium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units0 0 0 SOLX.B.TOCI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series0 0 0 -
Is MCAD.TO or SOLX.B.TO More Risky?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCAD.TO or SOLX.B.TO?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCAD.TO or SOLX.B.TO?
Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series quarterly revenues of --. Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's net income of -- is lower than CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series's net income of --. Notably, Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Premium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units is -- versus -- for CI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCAD.TOPremium Cash Management Fund Unhedged ETF Units-- -- -- -- SOLX.B.TOCI Galaxy Solana ETF C$ Unhedged Series-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 29
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 0.03% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 29
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 23.51% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 29
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is up 11.36% over the past day.
