Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
71
LUG.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$111.00
Seasonality move
:
12.06%
Day range:
$108.89 - $112.07
52-week range:
$30.04 - $119.76
Dividend yield:
1.51%
P/E ratio:
28.05x
P/S ratio:
12.05x
P/B ratio:
14.57x
Volume:
798.6K
Avg. volume:
831.4K
1-year change:
253.73%
Market cap:
$26.8B
Revenue:
$1.6B
EPS (TTM):
$3.96
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold, Inc.
|
$594.2M | $1.06 | 47.06% | 72.38% | $100.42 |
|
BGF.V
Beauce Gold Fields, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MNG.CX
Mongoose Mining Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SAND.CX
Silver Sands Resources Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SGU.V
Signature Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TGLD.CX
Torrent Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold, Inc.
|
$111.00 | $100.42 | $26.8B | 28.05x | $1.11 | 1.51% | 12.05x |
|
BGF.V
Beauce Gold Fields, Inc.
|
$0.05 | -- | $6.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MNG.CX
Mongoose Mining Ltd.
|
$0.03 | -- | $1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SAND.CX
Silver Sands Resources Corp.
|
$0.06 | -- | $866.4K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SGU.V
Signature Resources Ltd.
|
$0.08 | -- | $13.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TGLD.CX
Torrent Gold, Inc.
|
$0.25 | -- | $620.6K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold, Inc.
|
-- | 2.033 | -- | 2.59x |
|
BGF.V
Beauce Gold Fields, Inc.
|
-- | -4.239 | -- | -- |
|
MNG.CX
Mongoose Mining Ltd.
|
-- | 5.421 | -- | 0.01x |
|
SAND.CX
Silver Sands Resources Corp.
|
-- | 6.539 | -- | 0.10x |
|
SGU.V
Signature Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -1.328 | -- | 0.03x |
|
TGLD.CX
Torrent Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -1.136 | -- | 0.03x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold, Inc.
|
$398.1M | $381.8M | 54.57% | 54.57% | 62% | $252.5M |
|
BGF.V
Beauce Gold Fields, Inc.
|
-- | -$108.4K | -- | -- | -- | -$96.7K |
|
MNG.CX
Mongoose Mining Ltd.
|
-- | -$6.4K | -23.85% | -23.85% | -- | $200 |
|
SAND.CX
Silver Sands Resources Corp.
|
-- | -$84.8K | -- | -- | -- | -$5.5K |
|
SGU.V
Signature Resources Ltd.
|
-$84.7K | -$870.6K | -- | -- | -- | -$658K |
|
TGLD.CX
Torrent Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$107.8K | -62.59% | -62.59% | -- | -$27.8K |
Lundin Gold, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LUG.TO or BGF.V?
Beauce Gold Fields, Inc. has a net margin of 46.46% compared to Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 54.57% beat Beauce Gold Fields, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.64.65% $1.18 $1.8B BGF.VBeauce Gold Fields, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LUG.TO or BGF.V?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $100.42, signalling downside risk potential of -9.54%. On the other hand Beauce Gold Fields, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lundin Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Beauce Gold Fields, Inc., analysts believe Lundin Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Beauce Gold Fields, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.1 12 1 BGF.VBeauce Gold Fields, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LUG.TO or BGF.V More Risky?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.144% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beauce Gold Fields, Inc. has a beta of 1.828, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.809%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUG.TO or BGF.V?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Beauce Gold Fields, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold, Inc. pays 46.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Beauce Gold Fields, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUG.TO or BGF.V?
Lundin Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $615.8M, which are larger than Beauce Gold Fields, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net income of $286.1M is higher than Beauce Gold Fields, Inc.'s net income of -$134.1K. Notably, Lundin Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while Beauce Gold Fields, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold, Inc. is 12.05x versus -- for Beauce Gold Fields, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.12.05x 28.05x $615.8M $286.1M BGF.VBeauce Gold Fields, Inc.-- -- -- -$134.1K
-
Which has Higher Returns LUG.TO or MNG.CX?
Mongoose Mining Ltd. has a net margin of 46.46% compared to Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 54.57% beat Mongoose Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of -23.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.64.65% $1.18 $1.8B MNG.CXMongoose Mining Ltd.-- -$0.00 -$355.9K -
What do Analysts Say About LUG.TO or MNG.CX?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $100.42, signalling downside risk potential of -9.54%. On the other hand Mongoose Mining Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lundin Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mongoose Mining Ltd., analysts believe Lundin Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Mongoose Mining Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.1 12 1 MNG.CXMongoose Mining Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LUG.TO or MNG.CX More Risky?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.144% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mongoose Mining Ltd. has a beta of 1.385, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.461%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUG.TO or MNG.CX?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Mongoose Mining Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold, Inc. pays 46.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Mongoose Mining Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUG.TO or MNG.CX?
Lundin Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $615.8M, which are larger than Mongoose Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net income of $286.1M is higher than Mongoose Mining Ltd.'s net income of -$6.4K. Notably, Lundin Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while Mongoose Mining Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold, Inc. is 12.05x versus -- for Mongoose Mining Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.12.05x 28.05x $615.8M $286.1M MNG.CXMongoose Mining Ltd.-- -- -- -$6.4K
-
Which has Higher Returns LUG.TO or SAND.CX?
Silver Sands Resources Corp. has a net margin of 46.46% compared to Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 54.57% beat Silver Sands Resources Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.64.65% $1.18 $1.8B SAND.CXSilver Sands Resources Corp.-- -$0.01 -$165.5K -
What do Analysts Say About LUG.TO or SAND.CX?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $100.42, signalling downside risk potential of -9.54%. On the other hand Silver Sands Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lundin Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Silver Sands Resources Corp., analysts believe Lundin Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Silver Sands Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.1 12 1 SAND.CXSilver Sands Resources Corp.0 0 0 -
Is LUG.TO or SAND.CX More Risky?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.144% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silver Sands Resources Corp. has a beta of 2.261, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.136%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUG.TO or SAND.CX?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Silver Sands Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold, Inc. pays 46.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Silver Sands Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUG.TO or SAND.CX?
Lundin Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $615.8M, which are larger than Silver Sands Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net income of $286.1M is higher than Silver Sands Resources Corp.'s net income of -$84.8K. Notably, Lundin Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while Silver Sands Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold, Inc. is 12.05x versus -- for Silver Sands Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.12.05x 28.05x $615.8M $286.1M SAND.CXSilver Sands Resources Corp.-- -- -- -$84.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns LUG.TO or SGU.V?
Signature Resources Ltd. has a net margin of 46.46% compared to Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 54.57% beat Signature Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.64.65% $1.18 $1.8B SGU.VSignature Resources Ltd.-- -$0.00 -$1.9M -
What do Analysts Say About LUG.TO or SGU.V?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $100.42, signalling downside risk potential of -9.54%. On the other hand Signature Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lundin Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Signature Resources Ltd., analysts believe Lundin Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Signature Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.1 12 1 SGU.VSignature Resources Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LUG.TO or SGU.V More Risky?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.144% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signature Resources Ltd. has a beta of 2.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.855%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUG.TO or SGU.V?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Signature Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold, Inc. pays 46.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Signature Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUG.TO or SGU.V?
Lundin Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $615.8M, which are larger than Signature Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net income of $286.1M is higher than Signature Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$868.8K. Notably, Lundin Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while Signature Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold, Inc. is 12.05x versus -- for Signature Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.12.05x 28.05x $615.8M $286.1M SGU.VSignature Resources Ltd.-- -- -- -$868.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns LUG.TO or TGLD.CX?
Torrent Gold, Inc. has a net margin of 46.46% compared to Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 54.57% beat Torrent Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -62.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.64.65% $1.18 $1.8B TGLD.CXTorrent Gold, Inc.-- -$0.04 $410.5K -
What do Analysts Say About LUG.TO or TGLD.CX?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $100.42, signalling downside risk potential of -9.54%. On the other hand Torrent Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lundin Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Torrent Gold, Inc., analysts believe Lundin Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Torrent Gold, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.1 12 1 TGLD.CXTorrent Gold, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LUG.TO or TGLD.CX More Risky?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.144% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Torrent Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.861%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUG.TO or TGLD.CX?
Lundin Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Torrent Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold, Inc. pays 46.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Torrent Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUG.TO or TGLD.CX?
Lundin Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $615.8M, which are larger than Torrent Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lundin Gold, Inc.'s net income of $286.1M is higher than Torrent Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$107.8K. Notably, Lundin Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while Torrent Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold, Inc. is 12.05x versus -- for Torrent Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUG.TOLundin Gold, Inc.12.05x 28.05x $615.8M $286.1M TGLD.CXTorrent Gold, Inc.-- -- -- -$107.8K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 21.85% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is down 19.73% over the past day.
Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is down 14.21% over the past day.
