LSPD.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nerds On Site has a net margin of -10.7% compared to Lightspeed Commerce's net margin of -9.88%. Lightspeed Commerce's return on equity of -5.77% beat Nerds On Site's return on equity of --.

Lightspeed Commerce has a consensus price target of $28.49, signalling upside risk potential of 26.7%. On the other hand Nerds On Site has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lightspeed Commerce has higher upside potential than Nerds On Site, analysts believe Lightspeed Commerce is more attractive than Nerds On Site.

Lightspeed Commerce has a beta of 2.837, which suggesting that the stock is 183.687% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nerds On Site has a beta of 1.690, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.998%.

Lightspeed Commerce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nerds On Site offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lightspeed Commerce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nerds On Site pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lightspeed Commerce quarterly revenues are $378.2M, which are larger than Nerds On Site quarterly revenues of $2.7M. Lightspeed Commerce's net income of -$40.5M is lower than Nerds On Site's net income of -$263.5K. Notably, Lightspeed Commerce's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nerds On Site's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lightspeed Commerce is 2.60x versus 0.52x for Nerds On Site. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New World Solutions has a net margin of -10.7% compared to Lightspeed Commerce's net margin of -21844.44%. Lightspeed Commerce's return on equity of -5.77% beat New World Solutions's return on equity of -288.89%.

Lightspeed Commerce has a consensus price target of $28.49, signalling upside risk potential of 26.7%. On the other hand New World Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lightspeed Commerce has higher upside potential than New World Solutions, analysts believe Lightspeed Commerce is more attractive than New World Solutions.

Lightspeed Commerce has a beta of 2.837, which suggesting that the stock is 183.687% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New World Solutions has a beta of 3.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 221.089%.

Lightspeed Commerce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New World Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lightspeed Commerce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New World Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lightspeed Commerce quarterly revenues are $378.2M, which are larger than New World Solutions quarterly revenues of $8.4K. Lightspeed Commerce's net income of -$40.5M is lower than New World Solutions's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Lightspeed Commerce's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New World Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lightspeed Commerce is 2.60x versus 162.03x for New World Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XTM has a net margin of -10.7% compared to Lightspeed Commerce's net margin of -172.45%. Lightspeed Commerce's return on equity of -5.77% beat XTM's return on equity of --.

Lightspeed Commerce has a consensus price target of $28.49, signalling upside risk potential of 26.7%. On the other hand XTM has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lightspeed Commerce has higher upside potential than XTM, analysts believe Lightspeed Commerce is more attractive than XTM.

Lightspeed Commerce has a beta of 2.837, which suggesting that the stock is 183.687% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XTM has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lightspeed Commerce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XTM offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lightspeed Commerce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XTM pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lightspeed Commerce quarterly revenues are $378.2M, which are larger than XTM quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Lightspeed Commerce's net income of -$40.5M is lower than XTM's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Lightspeed Commerce's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while XTM's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lightspeed Commerce is 2.60x versus 2.37x for XTM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Windfall Geotek has a net margin of -10.7% compared to Lightspeed Commerce's net margin of -1775.73%. Lightspeed Commerce's return on equity of -5.77% beat Windfall Geotek's return on equity of -136.03%.

Lightspeed Commerce has a consensus price target of $28.49, signalling upside risk potential of 26.7%. On the other hand Windfall Geotek has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lightspeed Commerce has higher upside potential than Windfall Geotek, analysts believe Lightspeed Commerce is more attractive than Windfall Geotek.

Lightspeed Commerce has a beta of 2.837, which suggesting that the stock is 183.687% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Windfall Geotek has a beta of 1.813, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.259%.

Lightspeed Commerce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Windfall Geotek offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lightspeed Commerce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Windfall Geotek pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lightspeed Commerce quarterly revenues are $378.2M, which are larger than Windfall Geotek quarterly revenues of $25K. Lightspeed Commerce's net income of -$40.5M is lower than Windfall Geotek's net income of -$443.9K. Notably, Lightspeed Commerce's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Windfall Geotek's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lightspeed Commerce is 2.60x versus 5.83x for Windfall Geotek. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.