LNR.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hypercharge Networks has a net margin of 5.23% compared to Linamar's net margin of -82.02%. Linamar's return on equity of 10.87% beat Hypercharge Networks's return on equity of -182.75%.

Linamar has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.1%. On the other hand Hypercharge Networks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Linamar has higher upside potential than Hypercharge Networks, analysts believe Linamar is more attractive than Hypercharge Networks.

Linamar has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.858% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hypercharge Networks has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Linamar has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Hypercharge Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Linamar pays 10.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Hypercharge Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Linamar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Linamar quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Hypercharge Networks quarterly revenues of $1.4M. Linamar's net income of $138M is higher than Hypercharge Networks's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Linamar's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.93x while Hypercharge Networks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Linamar is 0.33x versus 1.25x for Hypercharge Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectra Products has a net margin of 5.23% compared to Linamar's net margin of 7.34%. Linamar's return on equity of 10.87% beat Spectra Products's return on equity of 5.98%.

Linamar has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.1%. On the other hand Spectra Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Linamar has higher upside potential than Spectra Products, analysts believe Linamar is more attractive than Spectra Products.

Linamar has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.858% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectra Products has a beta of 0.011, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.857%.

Linamar has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Spectra Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Linamar pays 10.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectra Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Linamar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Linamar quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Spectra Products quarterly revenues of $362.5K. Linamar's net income of $138M is higher than Spectra Products's net income of $26.6K. Notably, Linamar's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.93x while Spectra Products's PE ratio is 10.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Linamar is 0.33x versus 1.71x for Spectra Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SWMBRD Sports has a net margin of 5.23% compared to Linamar's net margin of --. Linamar's return on equity of 10.87% beat SWMBRD Sports's return on equity of --.

Linamar has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.1%. On the other hand SWMBRD Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Linamar has higher upside potential than SWMBRD Sports, analysts believe Linamar is more attractive than SWMBRD Sports.

Linamar has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.858% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SWMBRD Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Linamar has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. SWMBRD Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Linamar pays 10.76% of its earnings as a dividend. SWMBRD Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Linamar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Linamar quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than SWMBRD Sports quarterly revenues of --. Linamar's net income of $138M is higher than SWMBRD Sports's net income of --. Notably, Linamar's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.93x while SWMBRD Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Linamar is 0.33x versus -- for SWMBRD Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westport Fuel Systems has a net margin of 5.23% compared to Linamar's net margin of -5.84%. Linamar's return on equity of 10.87% beat Westport Fuel Systems's return on equity of -16.47%.

Linamar has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 31.1%. On the other hand Westport Fuel Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1586.74%. Given that Westport Fuel Systems has higher upside potential than Linamar, analysts believe Westport Fuel Systems is more attractive than Linamar.

Linamar has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.858% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westport Fuel Systems has a beta of 3.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 221.353%.

Linamar has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Westport Fuel Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Linamar pays 10.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Westport Fuel Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Linamar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Linamar quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Westport Fuel Systems quarterly revenues of $90.4M. Linamar's net income of $138M is higher than Westport Fuel Systems's net income of -$5.3M. Notably, Linamar's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.93x while Westport Fuel Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Linamar is 0.33x versus 0.24x for Westport Fuel Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.